Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Welcoming Peter Brantley

By dwhly | 22 January, 2013

As Hypothes.is moves from an early concept to a functional prototype and ultimately to a deployed application, it is essential that we organize ourselves to understand the primary communities of interest that we’re targeting. Of these, the scholarly community (scholars, scientists, journals, publishers and their various institutions) is certainly the most important. Members of this community are avid consumers of many tools related to collaboration, research, note taking, and others directly analogous to annotation. Moreover, they represent the highest quality potential participant base for developing an early group of active annotators.

It’s with this in mind that I’m delighted to announce that Peter Brantley is joining Hypothes.is as the Director of Scholarly Communications in February. He’ll be heading our strategy to identify the key challenges to the successful deployment of open annotation within the scholarly community, and then outline and help us execute against the steps necessary to address them.

Peter’s background is a remarkable fit with these responsibilities.
Indeed, the very first workshop I attended on annotation was one that Peter organized together with Todd Carpenter at NISO on developing bookmarking and annotation standards for ebooks. Most recently he served as the Director of the BookServer Project at the Internet Archive, where he worked “within a global open source development community, building and fostering an international ecology around the publication, distribution vending and lending of digital content based on open standards.” As a core part of his efforts at the Archive, he co-founded the Open Book Alliance, an alliance of major technology companies, library associations, and publisher groups advocating for an open and competitive market in digital books.

Peter is one of the most well-known figures in the open-source movement within online publishing. Among his numerous achievements, he founded the popular Books in Browsers conference, served as the Executive Director of the Digital Library Federation; was a board member of the International Digital Publishing Forum (IDPF); is a contributing editor for Publishers Weekly for libraries, copyright, and internet publishing; and has held key technical roles at several major research universities, directing the development of large-scale digital library services.

If these synergies weren’t enough, Peter has also thought deeply about the essential ingredient necessary to bring about broad annotation of the world’s knowledge: open peer review. His 2012 report for a Andrew W. Mellon-funded study on the requirements for implementing open, online peer-to-peer review reads very close to a functional specification laying out the necessary characteristics and components of such a system.

Welcome aboard!

Share this article