Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Questions and Answers in Annotation

This assignment was designed by Matthew Roberts at Grand Valley State University for an American Constitutional Foundations course. It requires students to ask and answer questions as part of their annotation of a Supreme Court case. Matthew also created this tutorial video to introduce his students to the hypothes.is tool.

assignment design

Marbury v. Madison is the first case whose opinion you’ve read in this course. For a number of reasons, this might have been a challenging experience. To help improve your understanding of the case, the opinion, and the decision the Court made in it, I’d like to have a “question and answer” session much like we would if we were together in the same classroom. To do this, we’ll be using an approach called “collective annotation.” This will allow us to share one copy of the opinion in Marbury, highlight it, and take notes together.

This assignment will be scored on a PASS / PROGRESSING / NO PASS basis. To receive a score of PASS on this assignment, please do each of the following:

• Create a free account on the Hypothes.is website (instructions can be found below). Hypothes.is is the tool that we will use for our collective annotations.

• Click the header/title of this item (or on this link here) to open a webpage copy of Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison. This is the same version of the opinion found in your Epstein and Walker textbook.

• If necessary, on the Marbury webpage sign-in to Hypothes.is

• Find three places in the opinion where you were confused, uncertain, or just had a question. Using the Hypothes.is highlighting and note tools, add your questions to the document. To receive a PASS you must add three (3) questions. Please be as complete and descriptive as you can in writing your question. Overly brief, terse, or vague questions such as “What’s this” or “I don’t understand” will not receive credit.

• Once you have added your questions, find two questions posed by your classmates and try to provide an answer. You will not be graded on the basis of whether your answer is correct or not. As with questions, overly brief, terse, or vague answers will not receive credit.