Presently, convention dictates that 100% of fossil carbon is counted but only a third of LULUCF carbon is counted
for - question - why does the GHG accounting convention have this inconsistency in the first place?
Presently, convention dictates that 100% of fossil carbon is counted but only a third of LULUCF carbon is counted
for - question - why does the GHG accounting convention have this inconsistency in the first place?