13 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Under the leadership of President Theodore Roosevelt,

      Fun fact, Theodore Roosevelt was the youngest us president ever.

    2. who had overthrown the Hawaiian monarchy, the

      Did hawaii had a monarchy long time ago? Im curious about the history

    3. .” When Americans intervened in the Middle East, they did it with a conviction in their own superiority.

      American news and history books often whitewash the truth, portraying the country as superior despite its dark past of genocide and slavery.

    4. As Americans had explored and settled the West before the Civil War, a sense of “Manifest Destiny” had become a key component of popular culture. The idea that it was obvious, inevitable, and perhaps even God’s will that the United States should expand across the continent helped generate popular support for projects like the Mexican-American War and the ongoing Indian wars of the nineteenth century.

      I learned that the US gained power by exploiting weaker civilizations, presenting it as exploration and trade for a positive image.

  2. Sep 2024
    1. Two of the most famous politicians of this era were someone who seemed to be a Populist, William Jennings Bryan, and an actual Socialist, Eugene V. Debs. Bryan (1860–1925) had a famous career as an accomplished orator,

      I'm curious what an "orator" is, and I've heard of Eugene v debs and I heard he's a socialist.

    2. “Wall Street owns the country,” the Populist leader Mary Elizabeth Lease told dispossessed farmers around 1890. “It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street.”

      Just realized that wall street had become so powerful that some said it dominated it which is really interesting

    1. in 1890 the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans owned one fourth of the nation’s assets and the top 10 percent owned over 70 percent.

      I just realized the reality that money was still being distributed and spread so wildly across the us is crazy

    2. Companies rose and fell, and many investors suffered losses, as manufacturers struggled to maintain supremacy in their particular industries. Achieving economies of scale was dangerous: while additional production increased profits, the high fixed costs of building and operating expensive factories dictated that even modest losses from selling underpriced goods were preferable to not selling goods at all.

      Its wierd and strange how not selling any goods is not better than losing

    3. The bigger the production run, the bigger the profits. New industrial companies that could raise the capital to take advantage of scale economies hungered for markets to keep their high-volume production facilities operating. Retailers and advertisers helped create the massive markets needed for mass production, and corporate bureaucracies facilitated the management of giant new firms. A new class of professional managers operated between the worlds of workers and owners and ensured the efficient operation and administration of mass production and mass distribution.

      I learnd that reatailers and advertisements, made mass production bigger than how it is.

    4. The precision of interchangeable steel parts, the harnessing of electricity after the victory of Nikola Tesla’s alternating current over Thomas Edison’s direct current, the innovations of machine tools, and the mass markets wrought by the railroads offered new avenues for efficiency.

      I'm confused on where it says "machine tools", i have no idea on what it means

    5. Inventions like sewing machines streamlined production and the Bell telephone and typewriters allowed more efficient communication, allowing new administrative frameworks to sustain the weight of vast, national corporations. National credit facilitated by the consolidation of banking in financial centers like New York eased uncertainties surrounding rapid movement of capital between investors, manufacturers, and retailers. Plummeting transportation and communication costs opened new national media, which manufacturers and their advertising agencies used to nationalize consumer products.

      I find it cool and suprise how businesses grew big because of the typewriter, and phones since people use to communicate with them.

    6. Although the Civil War was about slavery and not about states’ rights, as many revisionists have claimed, it is nonetheless true that the war and its aftermath catalyzed a widespread increase in federal power at the expense of state and local control. The Lincoln administration’s Pacific Railway Act created a new transcontinental rail industry. Its elimination of state banking in favor of a system of national banks consolidated credit in eastern financial centers, primarily in New York City.

      I never knew and I just learned that the civil war had big changes to the economy, and where the civil war was about slavery, no rights.

    7. In this chapter we will focus on the changing American economy in the period between the end or Reconstruction in 1876 and the First World War,

      I'm curious on what "reconstruction" means, and I'm also excited to see the rest of the article talking about the first world war, since I'm into studying wars.