49 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2022
    1. we randomly located six plots, each1 9 1 m, inside each F. japonica stand and sixadditional plots in the adjacent vegetation. Toestablish the plots outside the F. japonica stand, wedefined a boundary between the F. japonica andadjacent vegetation. We then randomly located theplots in the adjacent vegetation between 2 and 6 mfrom this boundary. We maintained the 2 m mini-mum distance to minimize shading and litter fall byF. japonica, and the 6 m maximum distance tominimize any preexisting soil differences betweenthe two vegetation types. Cover class of each plantspecies in each plot was visually estimated byclasses: 7 (75–100%), 6 (50–75%), 5 (25–50%), 4(10–20%), 3 (5–10%), 2 (1–5%), 1 (\1%) as used byBraun-Blanquet (1972). From Shannon diversityindices we calculated effective species richness

      methods

    2. Specifically, the objective ofthis study was to test the following hypotheses: (1)F. japonica invasion reduces species richness anddiversity, (2) F. japonica invasion reduces availablemineral N in the soil, (3) F. japonica invasion in NorthAmerican deciduous forest increases primary produc-tivity and plant N uptake by creating massiveF. japonica monocultures, and (4) clonal integrationpromotes expansion of F. japonica stands.

      hypothsis

    3. We hypothesized that F. japonica greatly reducesdiversity of natives and slows nutrient cycling whereit invades natural communities of Massachusetts,USA. We further hypothesized that physiologicalsupport of vegetative offspring by connected, estab-lished F. japonica plants of the same clone facilitatesthese effects. F. japonica is an ideal model species inwhich to test for a role of clonal growth traits ininvasiveness and for effects of invasion on ecosystemproperties such as primary productivity, and nutrientcycling

      hypothesis

    4. Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed)invades riparian areas and roadsides in New England.This large clonal species drastically alters the appear-ance of habitats by forming highly productive near-monocultures. To understand how these invasionsaffect ecosystem processes in New England, wequantified the impacts of F. japonica on speciesdiversity, primary productivity, and nitrogen cycling

      problem/purpose

    Annotators

  2. Sep 2022
    1. Biofilm formation and luminescence are critical for ini-tiation and maintenance of the association, respectively, suggesting that thecompound may link early and later development stages, providing further evi-dence that multiple small molecules are important in establishing these benefi-cial relationships.

      importance and contribution to the field

    2. Therefore it is likely there arespecialized metabolites used in the light organ microenvironment to modulatethese processes

      problem: baby squid do not have a microbiome, so how do they acquire it?

    Annotators

  3. Sep 2020
    1. In the 1970s, a reduction in the southern resident population size was due to the live capture killer whale fishery, with a slow recovery taking place following the cessation of this fishery. Recent reductions in the southern resident population are less understood, but a combination of factors have been suggested, including contaminant-related toxicity, declining prey abundance (salmon), and heavy vessel traffic, or a combination of these factors.

      Intro to what they will be studying. This information is still unknown

  4. Apr 2020
    1. To explore the population history of the Andean highlands, we first assess the genetic affinities of the prehistoric individuals and compare them to modern South Americans and other ancient Native Americans. Second, we construct a demographic model that estimates the timing of the lowland-highland population split as well as the population collapse following European contact, and last, we explore evidence for genetic changes associated with selective pressures associated with the permanent occupation of the highlands, the intensification of tuber usage, and the impact of European-borne diseases.

      What is the primary question or hypothesis in this study? (hint: look at the last paragraph of the introduction section to find this) primary goal: explore population history of andean highlands

      1. compare prehistoric genetics to modern south americans and native americans
      2. estimate timing of the population split/collapse following European contact
      3. genetic changes associated with high altitude, potatoes, and european diseases
  5. www.plymouth.edu www.plymouth.edu
    1. How-ever, there seems to be a complex web of trade-offs betweentraits depending on the type of surface and inclination, andlikely many other unmeasured factors such as hardness orstatic-electric properties of the substrates
      1. What additional data should be collected to further the findings of this study, or to build upon this work? Suggest next steps to the authors, and clearly justify/explain your choices. Be creative and thoughtful here – simply suggesting “more data is needed” is a generic and weak response. (30pts)
    2. Although our study design did not allow us to fully inves-tigate correlated trait effects on sprint spee
      1. What additional data should be collected to further the findings of this study, or to build upon this work? Suggest next steps to the authors, and clearly justify/explain your choices. Be creative and thoughtful here – simply suggesting “more data is needed” is a generic and weak response. (30pts)
    3. However, this improved performance comes atan apparent cost: on steep inclines, lizards with relativelylonger forelimbs run more slowly. This suggests that inurban areas selection to run quickly on the ground may bestronger than selection for fast running on inclined surfaces.Previous studies have similarly identified trade-offs in per-formance involving traits beneficial for vertical, complex,arboreal habitat use versus those more appropriate foropen, flat, terrestrial habitat use [31–34]. We build on thisby presenting evidence suggesting a trade-off also existsforA. cristatelluslimb length at gradual versus steeperinclinations.
      1. How does this study relate to/connect with content in the course covered thus far? Provide multiple examples of connections. (30pts)

      evolutionary trade-offs

    4. Such a substantial decrease in performance providesinsight into the mechanisms of natural selection in urbanareas. If a lizard is unable to run or maintain position onsmooth substrates it would be unable to use more thantwo-thirds of the urban habitat and would likely have troubleescaping from predators. In fact, studies have demonstratedthat faster sprint speed in lizards is favoured by naturaland sexual selection
      1. How does this study relate to/connect with content in the course covered thus far? Provide multiple examples of connections. (30pts) natural/sexual selection. adaptive evolution
    5. 1)locomotorperformance should differ between man-made and naturalsubstrates, and we predict a decrease in performance associatedwith man-made surfaces. (2) Lizard morphology will be corre-lated with sprint performance, and urban lizards shouldexhibit phenotypic shifts in functionally relevant traits. (3)Consequently, urban and forest lizards will differ from eachother in locomotor ability, particularly on man-made surfaces.Finally, (4) urban lizards should use a broader range of perchesthan forest lizards, although habitat use may be correlatedwith locomotor performance (habitat constraint and breadthhypotheses). Addressing these four hypotheses will help usquantify the role of locomotor performance in urban habitatsas a mechanism driving morphological divergence
      1. Why are the authors motivated to investigate this question/hypothesis? Fully describe what is known and what is not yet understood about the phenomenon under study, as described in the Introduction.

      not yet understood. What they motivated to find out

    6. f discriminatory habitat use (constraint)is related to performance, then lizards with less-than-optimalphenotypes may behaviourally avoid novel urban selectionpressures and impede evolution. Conversely, if individualswith the most appropriate phenotypes tend to expand intonovel urban spaces (breadth), evolutionary change may bepromoted
      1. Why are the authors motivated to investigate this question/hypothesis? Fully describe what is known and what is not yet understood about the phenomenon under study, as described in the Introduction.

      not yet understood

    7. . Winchellet al. [5] showed that individualA. cristatellususe anthropogenic and vegetative elements ofthe urban habitat to differing degrees, which suggests someurban lizards may be constrained in their habitat use, whileothers capitalize on the novel habitat and expand theirresource utilization.
      1. Why are the authors motivated to investigate this question/hypothesis? Fully describe what is known and what is not yet understood about the phenomenon under study, as described in the Introduction.

      what is known

    8. Prior research onAnolislizards (anoles) has establisheda strong connection between limb morphology and sprinting [6–8]. In general,lizards with longer limbs run faster, although this effect depends on perchdiameter with the greatest benefit on flat surfaces [9]. On inclined perchesbody width also influences sprint speed by lowering the centre of mass andincreasing stability [10,11]. In addition, both toepad area and lamella numberare correlated with clinging performance and habitat use: lizards with largertoepads and more lamellae exert stronger cling forces and perch higher
      1. Why are the authors motivated to investigate this question/hypothesis? Fully describe what is known and what is not yet understood about the phenomenon under study, as described in the Introduction.

      what is known

    9. Research has shown that urban populations of the lizardAnoliscristatellusexhibit morphological shifts compared to forest populations. Urbanlizards have relatively longer limbs and more subdigital scales called lamellae,used in adhesion to smooth surfaces
      1. Why are the authors motivated to investigate this question/hypothesis? Fully describe what is known and what is not yet understood about the phenomenon under study, as described in the Introduction.

      what is known

    10. Although agents of selection respon-sible for these shifts have not been shown, Winchellet al. [4,5] documentedsubstantial differences in habitat openness, perch width and perch roughnessbetween forest and urban sites and showed that urbanA. cristatelluscommonlyuse anthropogenic structures.
      1. Why are the authors motivated to investigate this question/hypothesis? Fully describe what is known and what is not yet understood about the phenomenon under study, as described in the Introduction.

      not yet understood

    11. Adaptation to a novel habitat involves not only phenotypic change, but afunctional benefit resulting in increased fitness. This phenotype–performance–fitness paradigm provides a framework for understanding adaptive phenotypicdifferentiation [1–3]. In short, natural selection acts on performance in a givenhabitat. If performance is correlated with heritable phenotypic variation inmorphology, selection can result in morphological change
      1. How does this study relate to/connect with content in the course covered thus far? Provide multiple examples of connections microevolution!
    12. Anolisis a diverse neotropical lizard genus containingapproximately 400 species. They are perhaps best known forrepeatedly converging in ecology and morphology on differentCaribbean islands, and for rapid adaptation in response tochanging environmental conditions

      npt sure if this is included in my section. speaker notes?

    1. Fascinatingly, the Andean highlanders also acquired the ability to digest potatoes, a domesticated crop derived from wild tubers.

      This is very interesting because aren't potatoes found around the globe? Why did only a small population of humans evolve this ability? Have they just been there long enough to evolve this ability while others didn't?

    2. Migrations into North and South America, weren’t as straightforward as we thought. This graphic shows possible migration routes, as posited by the new Cell study.

      This image is interesting because it doesn't show any Northward migration, only south. Does this mean people were more inclined to migrate south? Was this because North America was still covered in glaciers?

    3. It’s highly unlikely that this population sailed from Australia or Indonesia to South America. Rather, this group likely trekked northward from their point of origin, venturing through China and Siberia. This population likely didn’t spend too much time in North America, eventually finding their way into South America, while leaving no genetic trace of their journey—aside from this lone specimen in Lagoa Santa.

      In my comment above, I mentioned the possibility of a route through Antarctica before it became a frozen desert. Maybe these people didn't make their way through China and Siberia if they left no trace until they got they got to south america.

    4. identified a previously unknown population with a distinctly Australasian genetic marker—a very surprising discovery.

      this is incredibly interesting. Possibly dating back to a small population that migrated before Pangaea broke off? However, I looked at an image of Pangaea and Antarctica and India were sandwiched between Australia and South America.Perhaps there is some Australasian genetic markers in India too. I wonder what we could discover if we could properly assess Antarctica archaeologically.

    5. these researchers determined that, around 8,000 years ago, the ancestors of Native Americans were still on the move, migrating away from Mesoamerica (what is today Mexico and Central America) toward both North and South America.

      While it is obvious that some groups of people migrated what about those that stayed? It's not like their weren't ancient peoples that inhabited Mesoamerica (Aztec, Maya, etc). I wonder what determined if people moved or if they stayed. Or did some people even migrate back. The Mayan empire was 4000 years ago, which was still 4,000 years after this massive migration period.

    6. the movement of the first humans as they spread across the Americas, venturing both southward and northward and sometimes mixing in with the local populations.

      By 'mixing with local populations' could this describe why some people still have traces of neanderthal DNA to this day? I'm not sure if they were mostly extinct by then but I feel as if they couldn't have been too far gone if we are still seeing traces of their genes within our gene pool.

  6. Mar 2020
    1. Two regulatory networks are needed tounderstand the diversity of beak form. Our results are consistentwith the hypothesis that beak differences in Darwin’sfinches areestablished by combined and complementary changes in regu-lation of the pnc and the pmx

      hypothesis

    2. Wefind thatthe pnc in early development and the pmx during late de-velopment are regulated by two different sets of molecules

      heterochrony

    3. Our previous studies of pnc formationin Darwin’sfinches identified two signaling molecules,Bmp4andCaMthat regulate early differences in beak morphogenesis (18,19) and so provide a partial explanation for beak-shape differ-ences betweenfinch species

      example of studies form class- evo devo

    4. In this study, we aimed to un-derstand how changes in developmental controls of a morpho-logical trait may constrain or facilitate diversification. To thisend, we focused on unraveling the molecular and developmentalmechanisms responsible for patterning the differences in avianbeak shapes—which are usually associated with differences indiet and ecological niche—by taking advantage of the naturaldiversity of beak shapes in the iconic Darwin’sfinches.

      part of the hypothesis

  7. Jan 2020
    1. monoculture makes me incredibly nervous for the future of feeding the current worlds population. In the past decade our population has grown by almost a billion, but there have been very little advancements in sustaining a population of that size. I saw a documentary once that described if every acre of land on our planet was used for agriculture or meat, we still wouldn't be able to sustain our growing population.

  8. Oct 2019
    1. Developmental selection is a particularlypowerful mechanism of producing adaptive plasticity in novel environments because it requiresno prior evolutionary history with an environment for a potential phenotype match, and complexfunctional phenotypes can emerge from relatively simple developmental rules (Frank 1996, Hullet al. 2001, Kirschner & Gerhart 1998).

      This is an important concept because it implies that there are biological mechanisms of plasticity that must exist within all organisms in order for them to adapt to a new environment.

    2. evelopmental switches may move organisms toward a new optimumfor some forms of environmental change, but they are the least likely to result in an adaptiveplastic response in novel conditions when environmental change is extreme or discrete. Instead,generalized physiological mechanisms and developmental selection represent forms of plasticitythat may “preadapt” organisms to novel conditions.

      This is a really interesting topic of further research because plastic responses may be predisposed. This is a limitation to wild type plasticity success because the extremity of an environment has a redetermined response that is rarely adaptive.

    3. Although phenotypic plasticity affects a range of disparate organismal functions, we arguethat the developmental mechanisms, or causes, of plasticity can be classified into three broadcategories: evolved developmental switches, generalized physiological responses to stressors, anddevelopmental selection.

      This statement describes the three categories in which phenotypic plasticity is influenced. it's a key idea relative to wild type plasticity because it directly identifies the reasons why plasticity occurs. These categories can be limiting to plasticity by their presence in an organisms development.

    1. Indeed, prolonged labour poses a risk of infection by opportunistic microbionts

      Would the combination of a prolonged birth followed by a c-section yield a larger difference between the maternal and offspring microbiome? I wonder how a prolonged birth allows for higher infection risk. I found an article describing how postpartum breastfeeding and antibiotics can also alter the microbiome which goes to show how sensitive an infants microbiome truly is.

    2. By coevolving with the host, the microbiome has shaped phenotypes in our ancestral lineages

      This makes me wonder if the host or the symbiont has a larger effect consistently on the other during evolution. Maybe as the host evolves, it triggers the symbiont to evolve or vice versa

    1. Conversely,epigeneticvariationmightbeofprimeinterestinfluctuatingenvironment,henceincreasingtheeffectofselectiononepigeneticcomparedwithgeneticvariationintheseenvironment

      This seems like it would be applicable to marine species (ocean acidification, temerature changes, etc)

    2. Moregenerally,DNAmethylationinducedbyenvironmentalstress-orsduringdevelopmentthatproducesmaladaptivephenotypescanhavenegativeconsequencesinpopulations

      is this saying that environmental stress decreases fitness levels?

    3. Partofaorganism'sepigeneticlandscape(i.e.theepigeneticstatusatthegenome-widescale),andparticularlythatofDNAmethylation,canbemodulatedbyenvironmentalfactorseitherbiotic(e.g.socialenvironmentandparasites)orabiotic(e.g.temperature,droughtandchemicals

      do all species have the epigenetic potential or do organisms with shorter generations display more plasticity?

    4. Such“epigeneticmutations”areknowntobemorecommonthangeneticmutationsandarereversible

      How are they reversible? Can we influence "epigenetic mutations" in the wild to make species more resilient? or would the environmental pressures reverse it?

    5. theshort-terminteractionbetweenin-dividualsandtheirenvironmentismostlyignoredbecausegeneticsusuallyrepresentsthelong-termhistoryofpopulations

      isn't it important right now to focus on short term interactions? Is there a way to obtain enough research in lesser generations? If we are running out of time, how can these tools be used to speed the process up

    6. genetictoolsallowconservationbiologiststoaddresskeyissuessuchasestimatingdemographicparametersandadap-tivepotential,characterizingpopulationstructure,delimitingtaxo-nomicgroupsandevolutionary significant units(ESUs),andmanagingassistedgeneflowandpopulationrescuestrategies

      By using genetic tools, is it possible to come up with a solution for the current extinction or will it end at helping us understand it better

  9. Sep 2019
    1. hus only epi-polymorphic sites that are decoupled from genetic similarity should be significant, although residual popu-lation structure can still remain (Atwell et al. 2010; Brachi et al. 2010) and the genetic loci in close linkage disequilibrium with the epi-polymorphic sites cannot be ruled out as the causative drivers at this preliminzj stage.

      messy results, not always 'silver bullet' data

    2. Interestingly, another very successful introduced species, the house sparrow, also shows a great deal of epigenetic variation (Schrey et al. 2012: Liebl et al. 2013). Recently introduced birds had a higher proportion of methylation than did birds in older populations (Schrey et al. 2012).

      invasive species and epigenetic variation

    3. Epigenetic modifications contribute to phenotypic variation (Jablonka 2013), which may have wide ecological implications (Table 7 .1), including phenotypic plasticity in response to different environments
      1. understanding phenotype is based on understanding epigenetics
  10. Aug 2019
    1. However, not all who call themselves “integrative biologists” agree with these general principles.

      I feel like this is an open ended concept and is open for interpretation. Some people may identify as an integrative biologist with whatever that idea means to them.

  11. Apr 2019
    1. : experimental designs that enable testing the hypothesis whether study objects which take into account students’ interest in plants indeed raise long-lasting interest and lead to higher learning outcome regarding botanical topics.

      I wonder how we could effectively test this or design a way to monitor progress. It can't be a long study because we are running out of time where this kind of education is most important

    2. who show that students prefer living organisms that are of value for human use.

      This interesting because what about underutilized species? I'm sure not many students know much about how to find them or forage even

    3. Consequently, students’ lack of knowledge about plants hinders them from seeing the full extent of such important problems as global warming.

      How can we integrate these kinds of things to make all aspects interesting. Do we start teaching children at a younger age to inspire them?