12 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Roosevelt’s policy justified police actions in “dysfunctional” Caribbean and Latin American countries by U.S. Marines and naval forces that included the founding of a naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

      What is the criteria for a dysfunctional country. It seems to me like an excuse to take action.

    2. Roosevelt’s emphasis on developing the American navy and on Latin America as a key strategic area of U.S. foreign policy had long-term consequences.

      Roosevelt's plan to emphasis on developing the navy seems like a smart move to me.

  2. Sep 2024
    1. John Bull (Great Britain) and Uncle Sam (U.S.) bear “The White Man’s Burden (Apologies to Rudyard Kipling)”, by delivering the non-white peoples of the world to civilization.

      This piece seems to me like propaganda pushing the idea that the US is helping to 'civilize' countries by annexing them.

    2. In the Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East, the United States expanded on a long history of what proponents called exploration, trade, and cultural exchange but critics called annexation, invasion, and occupation.

      Despite it's apparent condemning of Eurpean colonialism, the US gained most of it's economic and political power though seizing and exploiting less powerful civilizations. Calling it "exploration, trade, and cultural exchange" seems to me like an attempt by the US to be viewed as a benevolant helper supporting smaller nations.

    1. Populists believed these efforts would help shift economic and political power back toward the nation’s producing classes.

      The common folks' need for a just system and the wealthy's abuse of power is something that is always repeated in history no matter the time period. I find it interesting how history always repeats itself in differnet ways. Maybe those ways are more similar than we think.

    2. Farmers met in Lampasas, Texas in 1877 and organized the first Farmers’ Alliance to try to regain some economic power as they negotiated with railroads, merchants, and bankers. Farmers reasoned that if they banded together, they might gain economic leverage similar to that of big business.

      I find the farmers' attempt to regain economic power through partnering with other industries quite interesting. It's a pretty smart move, considering how large the farming community was.

    3. Farmers found their financial security depended on a national economic system subject to rapid price swings, rampant speculation, and limited regulation. Many came to believe the system enriched “parasitic” bankers and industrial monopolists at the expense of the many laboring farmers who fed the nation by producing its many crops and farm goods.

      Despite feeding the nation, farmers were still unable to run their own system, and were under the control of the rich. I wonder how it would be like today if this system didnt change.

    4. “Wall Street owns the country,” the Populist leader Mary Elizabeth Lease told dispossessed farmers around 1890. “It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street.”

      This goes to show how the rich run the world and society, and always have. I find it pretty interesting how it's a woman who was a populist leader, despite how women were treated back then.

    1. In July, President Grover Cleveland dispatched thousands of American soldiers to break the strike, and a federal court issued a preemptive injunction against Debs and the union’s leadership. Debs was arrested and imprisoned, and the strike evaporated without its leadership.

      It seems as though the government failed alot of the common folk back then. The country seemed to favor those with more power and wealth. So much for 'all men are created equal'.

    2. Eight Chicago anarchists were arrested and, although no direct evidence implicating them in the bombing, were charged and found guilty of conspiracy. Four were hanged and one committed suicide before he could be executed.

      They were punished without evidence? Thats pretty interesting. The justice system seemed pretty different back then. I wonder how many people were falsely accused back then.

    3. By the 1870s, Darwin’s theory had gained widespread traction among biologists, naturalists, and other scientists in the United States and had begun to challenge the social, political, and religious beliefs of many Americans.

      Darwin's theory was very advanced for his time, and it still surprises me with how much it changed the scientific comunity. He must've been a very smart man.

    4. Courts, police, and state militias suppressed the strikes, but it was federal troops that finally defeated them. When Pennsylvania and West Virginia militiamen were unable to contain the strikes, federal troops stepped in. On the orders of President Hayes, American soldiers were deployed all across northern rail lines.

      I find it interesting how the government resorted to utilizing their own troops to suppress protests, rather than try to solve the issue at hand. It really shows where the priorities of the country lies. It still is prevalant to this day.