120 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. Abcam #ab30

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_303483

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_303483


      What is this?

    2. Abcam #ab6556

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_305564

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_305564


      What is this?

    3. Sigma #H3663

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_262051

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_262051


      What is this?

    4. abcam #ab184224

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_3086746

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_3086746


      What is this?

    5. Cell Signaling #31718T

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_2687580

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2687580


      What is this?

    6. Cell Signaling #2276

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_331783

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_331783


      What is this?

    7. Proteintech #12322-1-AP

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_2239979

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2239979


      What is this?

    8. Santa Cruz #sc365732

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_10859388

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_10859388


      What is this?

    9. abclonal #A13915

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_2760768

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2760768


      What is this?

    10. Santa Cruz #sc166820

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_2212959

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2212959


      What is this?

    11. Santa Cruz #sc-135564

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_2255056

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2255056


      What is this?

    12. Sigma #HPA001204

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_1080118

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_1080118


      What is this?

    13. Proteintech # 66009-1-Ig

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_2687938

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2687938


      What is this?

    14. Abnova #H00008878-M01

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_437085

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_437085


      What is this?

    15. mouse, DSHB #E7,

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_528499

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_528499


      What is this?

    16. mouse, MBL #M152-3,

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_1279144

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_1279144


      What is this?

    17. rabbit, MBL #PM036

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_2274121

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2274121


      What is this?

    18. rabbit, Sigma #7543,

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_796155

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_796155


      What is this?

    19. mouse, Sigma #F1804,

      DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113760

      Resource: AB_262044

      Curator: @abever99

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_262044


      What is this?

  2. Dec 2023
    1. Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions

      DOI: 10.54844/gmiw.2022.0087

      Resource: SCR_017041

      Curator: @evieth

      SciCrunch record: RRID: SCR_017041


      What is this?

  3. Nov 2023
  4. Sep 2023
  5. Jul 2023
  6. Jun 2023
  7. May 2023
  8. Apr 2023
    1. nti-CD3LALA (SP34R1LALA) mAbs, IgG isotype control mAbs, and anti-CD3 (FN18) were provided by the Nonhuman Primate Reagent Resource

      DOI: 10.1172/JCI156063

      Resource: AB_2819276

      Curator: @Apiekniewska

      SciCrunch record: RRID:AB_2819276


      What is this?

  9. Mar 2023
  10. Feb 2023
  11. Jan 2023
    1. RRID: IMSR_JAX:007909

      DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.055

      Resource: IMSR_JAX:007909

      Curator: @sofiakhan13

      SciCrunch record: RRID: IMSR_JAX:007909


      What is this?

    2. RRID: IMSR_JAX:007909

      DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.055

      Resource: IMSR_JAX:007909

      Curator: @sofiakhan13

      SciCrunch record: RRID: IMSR_JAX:007909


      What is this?

  12. Dec 2022
    1. RRID: AB_2535864

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_2535864

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2535864


      What is this?

    2. RRID: AB_2534017

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_2534017

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2534017


      What is this?

    3. RRID: AB_2223021

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_2223021

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2223021


      What is this?

    4. RRID: AB_262133

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_262133

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_262133


      What is this?

    5. RRID: AB_2565003

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_2565003

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2565003


      What is this?

    6. RRID: AB_10917747

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_10917747

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_10917747


      What is this?

    7. RRID: AB_628289

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_628289

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_628289


      What is this?

    8. RRID: AB_2298294

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_2298294

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2298294


      What is this?

    9. RRID:AB_2556542RRID

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_2556542

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2556542


      What is this?

    10. RRID:AB_2262810RRID

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102996

      Resource: AB_2262810

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2262810


      What is this?

  13. Nov 2022
    1. RRID: AB_2535792

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102977

      Resource: AB_2535792

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2535792


      What is this?

    2. RRID: AB_162543

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102977

      Resource: AB_162543

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_162543


      What is this?

    3. RRID: AB_141607

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102977

      Resource: AB_141607

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_141607


      What is this?

    4. RRID:AB_2536180RRID

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102977

      Resource: AB_2536180

      Curator: @a5munoz

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_2536180


      What is this?

  14. Oct 2022
  15. Sep 2022
  16. Aug 2022
  17. Apr 2022
  18. Mar 2022
  19. Feb 2022
    1. RRID: AB_10612019

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102704

      Resource: AB_10612019

      Curator: @sophiastull

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_10612019


      What is this?

    2. RRID: AB_10612019

      DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2022.102704

      Resource: AB_10612019

      Curator: @sophiastull

      SciCrunch record: RRID: AB_10612019


      What is this?

  20. Jan 2022
  21. Dec 2021
  22. Oct 2021
  23. Jul 2021
  24. Jul 2019
    1. Note that mentions tagged by “Incorrect” and“InsufficientMetaData” are deemed not legitimate and it is desirable that RDW andRRID-by-RDW not identify them.

      but there's no way any analysis restricted to the article text will ID this, because you have to resolve the RRID to figure that out, right?

    2. Papers containing SCR RRID

      Why would papers have a higher percentage of SCR RRIDs? Where are the other RRIDs found?

    3. Summary and Conclusions

      the conclusion is in the paragraphs above titled comparison. Perhaps this para should be titled "future directions" or something?

    4. The Use of RRIDs vs Data Citation

      This section seems like it should be in the introduction.

    5. corpi

      correct plural is corpora

    6. where authors did not report an RRID forthe resource that they used, constituting 37% of all RRID mentions identified by SciBot

      Ok so Scibot is identifying digital resources from a list & flagging when there's no RRID but there probably should be?

    7. RDW recognized mentions of digital resource names, RRIDs or URLs from a total of701110 articles

      There are 190000 RRIDs in 13000 articles. RDW found RRIDs (doesn't say how many) in 701110/(2341133+738910+72493+151784=3304320) articles. So there are resources mentioned in about 21% of articles, based on extraction, but presuming all of the 13000 RRID containing articles were included in the 3 million, the RRID prevalence is closer to 6%, but RRIDs mentioning digital resources are 26748 or .8%. So 4/5 of articles don't mention digital resources at all?

    Tags

    Annotators

  25. Oct 2018
    1. Nature Research supports the Resource Identification Initiative, with the aim of promoting unique, persistent identification and tracking of key biological resources, including antibodies, cell lines, model organisms and tools.   We encourage authors to include unique identifiers provided by the Resource Identification Portal, (RRIDs; for example, Antibody: RRID:AB_2140114; Organism: RRID:MGI_MGI:3840442), in the manuscript.  More information on how to include listed RRIDs or generate new RRIDs can be found on the Resource Identification Portal.

      So great that Nature supports the use of RRIDs in journals!

  26. Jan 2018
    1. Kathy and Carl,

      This is a test. I am attending the NISO webinar about annotating documents. I am testing use os hypothes.is (an open source tool.)

      During this webinar the subject of RRID's came up (which is new to me.)

      Can you read this document where I have highlighted the information in RRID - another site says

      "The Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) are in the published literature; publications currently reporting RRIDs can be found in Google Scholar PubMed Central or PubMed. "

      Source:https://www.force11.org/group/resource-identification-initiative

      Do you search on RRID's? Do you teach this?

      Can you see this article (without you having to create an account?)

      Kim

  27. Nov 2017
  28. Sep 2017
  29. Jan 2017
    1. We used a mouse line expressing EGFP under the control of the 5Htr3aR-promoter (5HT3aR-BACEGFP ) provided by the GENSAT project at Rockefeller University.

      Should insert an RRID here.

  30. Nov 2016
  31. Aug 2016
    1. These differences between lots and the possibility that the lot that we used was subject to precipitation during the experiment raises the possibility that the differences between our results and those of Erschbamer et al. are due to differences between lots of PD168393. For example, it is possible that the compound precipitated somewhat in our experiments, perhaps clogging the intra-spinal cannulae whereas the lot used by Erschbamer did not precipitate. Erschbamer et al. do not indicate the lot number for the PD168393 that they used in their paper, but subsequent discussions reveal that the lot number for the original study was B61311. According to the manufacturer, the differences in the numbering indicate that lot B61311 and D00069257 were synthesized at different times, whereas lot D00069257 and D00078517 were synthesized at the same time but packaged at different times. Unfortunately, the company has been unable or unwilling to provide material from previous batches, so it has not been possible to carry out direct head-to-head comparisons between different lots.

      Importance of providing more complete descriptions of reagents used.

  32. May 2016
    1. Publishers are also getting involved: around a dozen journals this year began asking their authors to use unique identifiers for their reagents as part of a push by the Resource Identification Initiative.

      Resource Identification Initiative gets mentioned in the science events that shaped 2015.

  33. Mar 2016
    1. Many large data providers in life sciences did not adapt LSIDs, probably because it meant too many changes to their architecture. Thus the exposure, knowledge and skills around LSIDs did not propagate to the masses.

      When we were designing the Resource Identification Initiative, we deliberately made sure that we didn't overload the requirements with technology. See report of pilot project as well.

  34. Dec 2015
  35. Sep 2015
    1. It was transferred to Boehringer-Mannheim as Clone 12H11, resold to Roche and finally bought by Chemicon, and it is now sold as MAB3026.
  36. Jul 2015
    1. It is clear from the use of ES2 and RMG-II cell lines that the Atlas Antibodies ARID1A antibody is specific for ARID1A in both Western blots and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded preparations of human origin and, coupled with the literature evidence, that it is validated in human tissue.

      Validation statement RRID:AB_1078205 Summary

    2. A No Primary antibody control (NPA) showed no staining in the epithelial or nuclear compartment (Figure 3B; Dataset e).

      Validation statement RRID:AB_1078205 No primary control

    3. There was no cytoplasmic or extracellular stromal background staining present and the antibody titrated successfully losing the intensity of staining, as expected

      Validation statement RRID:AB_1078205 Titration curve

    4. Control slides, omitting the primary antibody, were negative except for the ER2 condition in the RMG-II cell pellet where a weak cytoplasmic background could be seen (Figure 2; Dataset d). Thus there was minimal background inherent in the staining procedure. It was therefore determined that the antibody showed specificity for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues and could be run on murine tissue.

      Omission of primary antibody

      Validation statement RRID:AB_1078205

    5. It could be demonstrated that the HPA ARID1A antibody showed positive expression in ES-2 cell lines at the expected size of 270 kDa and no staining for RMG-II.

      Validation statement for RRID:AB_1078205

  37. Jun 2015
    1. mouse p-p44/42

      This antibody may have RRID:AB_627545 but information may not be accurate as insufficient metadata was provided.

    2. mouse SphK1

      This antibody may have RRID:AB_2271047 but information may not be accurate as insufficient metadata was provided.

  38. Apr 2015
    1. NF-κB p65 subunit from Abcam (ab7970

      This antibody has RRID:AB_306184

      This antibody did not appear to be included in the specificity tests on nf-kb antibodies by Herkenham et al. (2011) doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-141. and Slotta et al. 2014: doi:10.1369/0022155413515484

      However, given the widespread problems with nf-kb antibodies, one might be concerned.

    2. p65 from Chemicon (MAB 3026

      This antibody has RRID:AB_2178887.

      Flag: A concern about specificity of this antibody in brain has been noted in Herkenham et al. (2011) doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-141.

      An issue with this antibody has been raised in Slotta et al. 2014: doi:10.1369/0022155413515484

  39. Mar 2015
    1. monoclonal pSer-536 clone 93H1

      This antibody has RRID:AB_331284

    2. NLS-RelA (monoclonal MAB 3026 clone 12H11, 1∶250; Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany

      This antibody has RRID:AB_2178887.

      Flag: A concern about specificity of this antibody in brain has been noted in Herkenham et al. (2011) doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-141.

      An issue with this antibody has been raised in Slotta et al. 2014: doi:10.1369/0022155413515484