It could be interesting to break the 4th wall and explain that this resources is something that we're co-producing in the community, if we get to that point.

Typo

Let's revisit the workflow for the videos themselves and think about how we could organise the "rigorously research", "carefully edited", "professionally produced" aspects, as well as bring in more intelligent openness!

But, How have they been invited? What specifically have they been asked to do? This is where the Heartbeat (meeting schedule) and Roadmap could be useful to introduce as well.

It would be useful to have a "quickstart guide" for contribution already on the first page, then maybe some further pointers for how to do it in the About page.

"The UK government also argues that copyright law is now 'not tenable', a situation reflected by a proliferation of legal disputes over the issue." (source)

The previous UK legislation uses the principle "the right to read is the right to mine". This is related to discussion in the open data article about web scraping. Folks have talked about creating a new chapter somewhere about open research and AI, and this is leading in that direction.

Presumably this live-delivery style will need to be overhauled for print.

Text duplication