he mere fact that one person has something or is entitled tosomething—taken simply by itself—is no reason at all foranother person to want the same thing or to think himselfentitled to it.
POINT
he mere fact that one person has something or is entitled tosomething—taken simply by itself—is no reason at all foranother person to want the same thing or to think himselfentitled to it.
POINT
Every person should be accorded the rights, therespect, the consideration, and the concern to which he isentitled by virtue of what he is and of what he has done. Theextent of his entitlement to them does not depend uponwhether or not other people are entitled to them as well.^
THINK...HMMMM
If a person has enough resources to provide for thesatisfaction of his needs and his interests, his resources areentirely adequate;
GOOD POINT. ADEQUATE RESOURCES
what is it genuinely important thathe take into account?
WHAT IS IMPORTANT FOR WELLBEING?
es
BAD LIVES ARE BAD...LO... WHUT?
Surely what is of genuine moral concern is notformal but substantive. It is whether people have good lives,and not how their lives compare with the lives of others
GOOD LIFE V COMPARING YOUR LIFE TO ANOTHER
appeals in behalf of equality oftenhave very considerable emotional power
EMOTIONAL POWER OF EQUALITY
Having less is compatible, after all, with having quite abit;
LESS IS MORE
And yet, is it really indisputable that such discrepancies mustalways be so awful?
AUTHOR POSITS IS THAT SO BAD?
Wheneverit is morally important to strive for equality, it is always becausedoing so will promote some other value rather than becauseequality itself is morally desirable.
IMPORTANT
In short, cheap labor has been paralleled by the evolution of agrowing number of parcels of cheap building stock and land
ANALYSISSSSSS
he decline in applicants for the factory jobsin the region may be a direct result of a "de-skilling perception" of theregional work force-especially among the younger workers of the Buf-falo area.
WE NEED TRADES BUT TRADE SCHOOL ISNT AS READILY AVAILABLE TO ALOT OF KIDS
he rate of black unemployment isstill significantly higher than that among whites,
INTERESTING
Pay as a measure of the region's gender division of labor is almost asimbalanced as the income comparison between blacks and whites. In1980, the earning gap between men and women in Buffalo was signifi-cant,
AGAIN, WTF?!
For example, whites still earn substantiallymore than blacks in the Buffalo area.
WTF?!
the auto industrycertainly drives what is left of its manufacturing base.
LOL PUN
During the decade of the 1980s, the re-gional economy declined severely in the first years. When it began torecover in the middle years, it did so at a rate still far below that of thenational economy.7I At the same time, service sector activities are stillnot substantially competitive enough to drive long-term regional eco-nomic restructuring. In fact, if there is a new economic structure repre-senting a "breaking down and building up again, [a] deconstruction andattempted reconstitution' 72 of the industrial base, then it is one wherethe once vaunted manufacturing base of Buffalo has been "reconstituted"as a fragile, dependent and marginally competitive outback of the na-tion's volatile service industries.
USE THIS IN YOUR ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The main technological reason for this changewas the introduction of the railroad
important economical changes in the later 19th centure
sense of the temporal and spatial uneven development of capital-ism, and the ways in which capitalism's contradiction is produced andmanaged."
important
Rather, for most of the last de-cades, the region represented a prime example of how a region can be-come a victim of economic restructuring rather than a beneficiary
buffal
Moral Hazard; Adverse selection
that would pay for autom
this would only work if the price of cars themselves were to decrease. being a driver in the us is already somethign that many people cant afford. we often wish there was no insurance. to pay at the pump also when gas prices are so high and wages are so low, would eccessively force less driving. people might not even beable to drive to work to make their wages. or may have to work two or more jobs which they already do. in theory charging at the pump is a nice idea, but perhaps the best ides for urban and suburban areas is more public transport or creating policy that incentivises walking or riding a bike (where permitted) in tangent with extra taxation at the pump.
iability.
is not the accident itself an incentive to "stay home" or "drive carefully"? why is it that even a client that has not contributed negligence and has acted based upon proper procedure should be forced to pay equally to an accident they did no equally contribute to?
driving.
but 5 million dollars is a fairly large sum, is it perhaps that people aren't familiar with the repercussions and simply expect the insurance to pay that amount? thus they will never have to pay that amount unless they are to repeat the offense in excess.