350 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2017
    1. Gift monies may support a variety of research and creative activities, but are not generally managed by ORCA

      Gifts are handled by LDS Philanthropies if there are no deliverables.

    Annotators

  2. Mar 2017
    1. (1) Qualities of effective leadership (2) Principal's establishing a vision and setting goals (3) Principals positively impacting school culture (4) Principals leading distributed leadership systems (5) and personal traits of the effective principal.

      What makes a successful principal...

  3. Nov 2016
    1. By enabling students to DO things with RESOURCES that weren’t previously possible or practical (ENABLE new pedagogies)

      A list would be great here. What ideas would be in that list?

    2. Open means “free plus 5R permissions.”

      How important would it be for students to engage in all of the Rs as opposed to 1 or 2 of them?

      Can it be open pedagogy if the students don't know about open?

    3. Hattie is a good first source

      How respected is this work. Multiple intelligences has books and a firm hold on education (in many areas), but it isn't well respected in higher education.

    4. Students LEARN as a result of the things they DO

      maybe you say this later, but teachers should still be learning, thus making them students, thus they will learn better when doing as well.

    1. Powerful examples of open pedagogy will give faculty a specific, direct, even selfish reason to adopt OER

      I think the arguement is even stronger outside of higher education. PLCs are such a driving force in education today, if OER was a point of discussion in those meetings, education could see real change.

    2. Making progress in open pedagogy is also critically important to winning the long-term OER adoption battle

      This I can totally agree with. Changing pedagogy could in turn drive OER adoption.

    3. what can I do pedagogically if I don’t have to worry about copyright

      Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't they still have to worry about copyright? Just because you have OER doesn't mean you avoid copyright, that would take extra effort.

    4. There is nothing about OER adoption that forces innovative teaching practices on educators

      I would say OER creation forces innovation, would I be wrong?

    5. one’s pedagogy magically change to take advantage of the capabilities of the internet

      like how many online classes are just digital versions of the most boring course you could imagine!

    6. They are choosing to ignore

      Lets not forget that the majority of teachers still aren't aware of OER. You can't ignore what you don't know exists...or can you?

    7. Show a variety of worked examples. If this is the first time you’re using this valuable assignment, use the OER that you’ve compiled to support student learning as your examples. Talk students through the process of selecting existing resources and remixing them into something that specifically supports their learning. If you have existing student work that you can show, even better

      I think it is important to point out that the examples weren't created by mega geniuses who were born with a gift for creating such things. OER is made by regular people who put a little effort into a focused project. Encourage students that they can do it just as easily and as well as others.

    8. Teacher Clarity

      Ha Ha, one of my research assistants was complaining about how difficult it is in one of her classes this semester because of lack of teacher clarity.

    9. Teacher Student Relationships

      I just read a study that ended with an arguement for the importance of relationships. it was specific to teaching ELLs, but I think it carries over to other contexts: "good teaching for ELLs must also include teachers’ competency to develop cross-cultural relationships with their students....teaching is fundamentally relational."

    10. effective teaching and learning

      This is somewhat of a misnomer...we often don't do what is most effective because it cost to much. I don't oppose this idea, just find it frustrating when people argue for effectiveness when it has to be measured within the constraints of efficiency and economical.

      I should point out that I agree that OER could break the mold, at least until "they" get a hold of it and mandate it.

    11. improvement in learning may even be detectable when comparing learning in the population before OER adoption with learning in the population after OER adoption

      How large a population would this require? It would be interesting to peek into the future and see what impact OER has in the grander scale.

    12. openness more generally

      General openness is something we should be considering in OER. Is it possible to be too open? What are the extremes of OER and open? What controls or safeguards would protect from either extreme?

    1. teacher change (e.g., that professional development alters teacher knowledge, beliefs, or practice

      teacher change is altering knowledge, beliefs, or practice

    2. activ-ities that “improve and increase teachers’ knowledge of theacademic subjects the teachers teach” (content focus) and that “are . . . sustained [and] intensive” (duration) and “are aligned with and directly related to state academic content standards, student academic achievement standards, and assessments” (coherence).

      def of PD by NCLB

    3. Paul Cobb’s (1994) statement that “learning should be viewed as both a process of active individual construction and a process of enculturation into the . . . practices of wider society”

      Paul Cobb's quote about what is PD

    4. “any activity that is intended partly or primarily to prepare paid staff members for improved performance in present or future roles in the school districts

      def of PD

    5. continuing development and learning of teachers as one of the keys to improving the quality of U.S. school

      PD for teachers key to improving schools

  4. Oct 2016
    1. It is legal in several countries including the United Kingdom and the United States to produce alternative versions (for example, in large print or braille) of a copyrighted work to provide improved access to a work for blind and visually impaired persons without permission from the copyright holder

      What about making easier versions for early readers? Or translations?

    2. the purpose and character of one's use the nature of the copyrighted work what amount and proportion of the whole work was taken, and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

      I would love to talk more about use in educational settings. Especially of multi-media materials.

    3. However, in countries that implement moral rights, a copyright holder can in some cases successfully prevent the mutilation or destruction of a work that is publicly visible

      This is interesting. I would be interested to know more. Examples?

    4. many copyright disputes are settled by a direct approach to the infringing party in order to settle the dispute out of court

      this is the mafia method :)

    5. U.S. law requires that the fixation be stable and permanent enough to be "perceived, reproduced or communicated for a period of more than transitory duration

      So sand art wouldn't qualify I'm guessing

    6. Copyright laws are standardized somewhat through these international conventions such as the Berne Convention and Universal Copyright Convention

      I'm surprised they were able to agree on copyright terms

    7. historian Eckhard Höffner argues that the absence of copyright laws in the early 19th century encouraged publishing, was profitable for authors, led to a proliferation of books, enhanced knowledge, and was ultimately an important factor in the ascendency of Germany as a power during that century

      questionable

    8. The original length of copyright in the United States was 14 years, and it had to be explicitly applied for. If the author wished, they could apply for a second 14‑year monopoly grant, but after that the work entered the public domain, so it could be used and built upon by others

      this sounds better than the current laws

    9. Generally, copyright is enforced as a civil matter, though some jurisdictions do apply criminal sanctions

      So generally you won't go to jail for infractions but you could get fined.

    1. This language may mean that Internet service providers are not liable for the infringing communications of their users

      As it should be. People should be responsible for their actions.

    1. James Boyle

      Boyle's book is quite interesting. He does a great job of supporting his arguement with examples. I'm not much of an auditory learner, but I was glad I could listen while exercising. $5 was totally worth it.

    2. some free thing I download off the internet can be as effective in supporting learning as expensive, professionally produced resources

      This is such a farce! Companies really, really want us to believe this so that we buy their product. List some of the free products you use daily and see if they are as good as others you pay for. Google, wikipedia, Apache, thousands of mobile device apps, online recipes, can you think of others?

    1. the manner in which OER use encouraged sharing and collaboration between educators will have its influence felt at one or two degrees removed

      more research should be done on this in terms of PD and continuing educator learning

    2. Unsurprisingly a majority of educators (73.1%, n=264) believed that using OER saves students money; a smaller percentage of students (60.9%, n=196) agreed with educators, however librarians were mainly undecided (51.2%, n=83)

      What is the debate here? How could it not save them money?

    3. The question here asked educators their views on the impact of OER use on their own teaching practices: 64.3% (n=620) said that they used a broader range of teaching and learning methods; 59.4% (n=558) agreed that they reflected more on the way that they teach; 44.5% (n=416) that they more frequently compared their own teaching with others; 40.3% (n=262) that they now used OER to develop their teaching. Data from other questions in the surveys also revealed that 32.8% (n=363) of educators say they have written a blog post in the last year, 14.3% (n=121) have added comments to a repository suggesting ways of using a resource, and 23.8% (n=201) commented on the quality of a resource.

      This is great! OER could change the teaching profession. It could raise educators back to the level of expert instead of simply curriculum implementors.

    4. OER is not going to be a make or break issue of retention. It is not a panacea for at-risk students.

      True, but the fact that the book is theirs and they can write in it, and possibly help update it could change their engagement drastically

    5. I went from being horrible in AP Biology to actually reading these and went from a D 66% up to a A 90% so far.

      Are OER material more user friendly? More interesting? More colloquial?

    6. increased students’ experimentation with new ways of learning

      I can see this happening. OER broadens one's perspective a bit and says, "hey look, there is a different way to do textbooks, maybe there are different ways to do other things"

    7. oermap.org

      Cool little graphic, but needs explanation to be more understandable. Site has other resources/information that are interesting and helpful as well.

    8. Performance: Use of OER leads to improvement in student performance and satisfaction

      This is a bold assumption if not backed up. Was this a belief before we had any evidence or is it a new belief now that we have some evidence?

    9. Promote continuous improvement of instruction and personalized learning

      This is a great reason for OER. What better way to personalize learning and provide PD than to have people develop resources-and support them/fund them while doing it.

    1. several additional resources

      The surveys are already created and the method and questions developed. This would be a great way to get started with research. It is very hard to create everything that is already here.

    1. This is an impressive undertaking. I can see where this list would be important to those who feel the need to prove that OER is good enough. I also appreciate the link to "other" research that doesn't meet the standards of those that are included on this page.

    2. Even if the use of OER materials do not significantly increase student learning outcomes, this is a very important finding. Given that (1) students and teachers generally find OER to be as good or better than traditional textbooks, and (2) students do not perform worse when utilizing OER, then (3) students, parents and taxpayers stand to save literally billions of dollars without any negative impact on learning through the adoption of OER.

      I don't quite understand why it is so important to justify the use of OER on the basis of academic performance. If it would save money for the school it would have been done already. In any case, saving the student's money will most likely result in more money for the school. Change toward a good idea tends to be slow, whereas change toward a bad idea happens very quickly.

    1. When students can become coauthors of those materials, what changes in the way they engage?

      This is an awesome question. Maybe the most important one of all.

    2. we should exercise extreme caution in generalizing results beyond the population sampled or assuming this pattern of gains would happen in other locations.

      no we shouldn't. this is the "accepted" view of research. if we let the research speak for itself, the generalizability can be realized as a fictional construct used to bolster some research over others

    3. Alternatively, gains could be explained by the effect that the process of open textbook adoption may have had on teachers. Teachers who feel increased autonomy or investment in open textbooks might teach better, even if the quality of the texts is roughly equal

      Thats what I said in the last reading

    4. ability to annotate their books, which may, in turn, increase comprehension

      I agree here. They can create a study guide directly in the book-including teacher comments, insights, ah-has, etc

    5. which teachers can continue to revise and improve as part of their professional development activities

      such PD would be way more beneficial than the PD I was required to attend

    6. However, when a school or district makes the move to printed open textbooks they can achieve significant savings over traditional textbook adoptions, allowing them to begin saving for the transition to devices. This initial period during which teachers use open textbooks in print can provide teachers with the opportunity to become familiar with the new textbooks in a familiar format and begin the process of revising and improving the books.

      what about the concern about losing funding? is that a serious concern? does the $ have to be used for print books?

    7. adopting open textbooks combats the deskilling of teachers and reinstates them as skilled experts in both content and pedagogy

      this is a great reason for adopting OER. if I were an administrator, I think this would tip the scales for sure. it is like built in PLC and PD

    8. It would be premature to suggest that every teacher who remixes their own open textbooks would expect to see uniform improvements in student performance

      but the scores weren't lower so why not save a buck or two?

    9. the result that students using open textbooks demonstrated similar or slightly better learning outcomes may be important for science educators given budget constraints in secondary education

      here's the kicker. small effect sizes yes, but significant and cheaper

    10. students using open textbooks generally scored modestly higher on the state CRTs than they would have using traditional textbooks

      This needs to be redone and redone again to strengthen the arguement. If this holds constant over multiple groups...

    11. We believed that any textbook effect that emerged as significant in the presence of ten such covariates would be reasonably un-confounded and trustworthy

      A fair assumption

    12. It was possible that teachers choosing to use the open textbook differed in systematic ways from teachers who chose to use traditional science textbooks

      I think this is a good research question in itself

    13. it is worth questioning whether perceptions of quality are reliably correlated with student learning

      it is worth questioning the quality of traditional textbooks as well. does anyone do that? most of the textbooks I used were considered poor quality by those who used them...they had outdated content, the activities and questions were far above grade level, and the reading level was often 2 grades higher than the grade level-while most our students were below grade level.

    14. switching from traditional materials to OER can be daunting

      states like California often prescribe certain book as approved for use. couldn't they do the same for OER, which would remove the "work" a teacher would have to do to find a good one?

    15. outdated materials from being used in U.S. classrooms, where it is common to find textbooks that are 7–10 years old and contain outdated information

      yep

    1. Business 110 and Biology 111, students in the treatment condition showed a significantly higher rate of completion than students in the control condition

      I wonder why these courses?

    2. thus indicating that OER could be substituted without any negative impact on learning

      if the institutions were paying for the books they would have already made the substitution. since students pay, often using parent's money or financial aid, the institution is "concerned" about quality

    3. students who were enrolled in OER versions of a reading course performed better than their peers who enrolled in the same course using non-OER materials

      Especially when they found out their buddies didn't have to pay for books!

    4. increased from 63.6 % in fall 2011 (when traditional learning materials were employed) to 68.9 % in fall 2012 when all courses were taught with OER

      I wonder if adding the OER influenced the professors to do a better job? Maybe instead of OER improving learning, it improves teaching....

    5. They concluded that students who used the open textbook achieved better grades in the course, had a lower withdrawal rate, and scored better on the final examination

      same instructor?

    6. colleges instead choose to place students in educationally sub-optimal but significantly more affordable classes with many other students and a single instructor

      ha ha good point

    7. the core purpose of education is to support learning.

      I love that it says support learning, not cause learning or "is" learning. Learning happens in lots of places/ways outside of formal education as well.

    8. greater financial resources correlate positively with student persistence

      I wouldn't know. I'd imagine however that if $ wasn't an issue I would be able to focus on learning instead of finishing.

    9. 55 % of teachers adopting OER reported that the open materials were of the same quality as the materials they had previously used, and 35 % felt that they were better.

      Interesting that the % are relatively the same as the students

    10. 50 % of students said that the OER textbooks were of the same quality as traditional textbooks and nearly 40 % said that they were better.

      Were students given a rubric to determine quality or was it based on their opinion?

    1. Retain – the right to make, own, and control copies of the content (e.g., download, duplicate, store, and manage) Reuse – the right to use the content in a wide range of ways (e.g., in a class, in a study group, on a website, in a video) Revise – the right to adapt, adjust, modify, or alter the content itself (e.g., change an example or translate the content into another language) Remix – the right to combine the original or revised content with other material to create something new (e.g., incorporate the content into a mashup) Redistribute – the right to share copies of the original content, your revisions, or your remixes with others (e.g., give a copy of the content to a friend)

      I've seen this somewhere ;)

    1. 121211 Final presentation vCorrected.pptx9However, users find it challenging to discover and use existing content

      This is soooo true. How many times have you looked for something helpful and found way, way, way too much, to the point that you just gave up and made your own resource?

    2. Research indicates OER is showing positive green shoots, but still has ways to go before reaching mainstream

      This is a great way to view this information. Great chart.

    1. forced us to rethink the educational process

      Which is what everyone, every institution should be doing. Our industrial age thinking will not be sufficient for the future.

    2. Evaluation is key. Understanding what doesn't work is as important as recognizing success

      This should be a part of evaluating OER as well, if it isn't good, it should be improved. No reason to have a huge database of subpar resources

    3. In studio teaching, lectures, recitations, and hands-on laboratories are merged into a single experience. Students work together in groups of nine per table in a specially equipped classroom. They make heavy use of computer simulations and visualizations. White boards are always available for impromptu discussions or explanations. Video projection screens make it possible to present and share materials in both impromptu and formal ways

      One challenge to this is that students can have a great learning experience in such a setting, but then the instructor feels it is necessary to require something more. This often ends up being some type of written document that is busy work-ending up in the trash and only required because the instructor wants to make sure that students learned. To avoid having to do "extra" busy work after class, students will use their discussion time to talk about writing the paper instead of actually having a great discussion.

    4. We are proud of the many exceptional lecturers on our campus. They inspire students and organize knowledge wonderfully

      This can be a great resource. One of the downsides to everyone learning on their own from an online source is the possibility of missing these lectures.

    5. LIBRARIES

      MIT has made courses available, but what about other resources such as library access? Is their library open to those who want to access the courses?

    6. It is a form of academic publishing more than of teaching. It puts materials in the hands of others to use as they see fit

      As it should be. Let context drive instruction

    7. we must generate sufficient funding to provide a high level of service, making it as easy as possible for faculty members to convert their materials to a high-quality Web format

      I can see where some institutions will expect and even require faculty to make dramatic change without support or funding. It will just be a part of their "job description".

    8. Higher education must learn from this

      Higher ed needs to stop rewarding professors for hiding their work in expensive journals. If you want to advance your career you have to publish in these journals. How much change has happened in this arena?

    9. provide access to the brightest young men and women regardless of their social and economic backgrounds

      If they have the support and resources to get them to the institution.

    10. will remain an essential element of our society, providing the most intense, advanced, and effective education

      But they do need to re-imagine what it will look like.

    1. Support a spectrum of openness—Openness is a characteristic based on accessibility and responsiveness.

      We often talk of open as being all or none. This talks of the continuum of open.

    2. ust type it in (plus the system you are using) and instantly Google gives you pages and pages of fellow geeks who have encountered that same error code along with what it means and what to do about it. This has allowed, for example, a 60-year-old colleague to run a one-person software shop to confidentially master Java and Enterprise JavaBean (EJB). He was not going to go back to school; he accepted a task to build a system in EJB using Google as a primary (open) resource.

      A friend of mine was the district tech guy, but he didn't have any tech training, he just googled everything.

    3. This is a rich tapestry of history games already, but how do they get used in history classes, if they do at all

      Ha! I find this somewhat ironic since I was told we couldn't waste class time with games or art projects.

    4. We want to create a space where the teacher as entrepreneur—whether a certified schoolteacher, a home schooling parent, a librarian, a community center leader, or a retired professional can share and learn—share material, exercises for students, experiments, projects, portfolios of examples, etc

      This is great, but when there is so much to sift through that you can't ever see it all, it becomes overwhelming and may go unused.

    5. The initial results of this system indicate that it outperforms the best human tutors and reportedly reduces time to mastery by 60 percent or more

      Here comes the future of A.I. that the sci-fi movies warn us about :) It is becoming more and more capable.

    6. Most learning here happens experientially, often from their making decisions and having to live with and reflect on the consequences.

      But does it transfer to real world situations?

    7. In developing countries, adoption of mobile phones far exceeds adoption of PCs,

      Who would have thought? Designing for mobile devices is more important than for PCs a this time.

    8. Today, there are over thirty million people who are fully qualified to enter a university, but there is no place available. This number will grow to over 100 million during the next decade

      wow

    9. Explore roles for students in creating, enhancing, and adopting OER. Consider an “OER Corps” in which students receive training, small stipends, and prestige to assist in material preparation, enhancement, and use (especially in historically disadvantaged domestic communities and developing countries)

      This is an intriguing idea.

    10. Sustainability

      I have questions about this too. When OER becomes common, will it still receive funding or will there be some other "new" movement that will get all the funding.

    11. Extend the reach and impact of open courseware by encouraging the adoption and adaptation of open educational materials around the world

      I think I would enjoy working on this aspect of OER

    12. Under these assumptions we estimate that of the total of $68 million in grants, $43 million has gone to the creation and dissemination of open content and $25 million into reducing barriers, understanding, and/or stimulating use. Of the total, about $12 million has gone to non-U.S. institutions primarily in Europe, Africa, and China for capacity building, translation, and/or stimulation of established institutions such as the Open University in the United Kingdom and Netherlands so they will be more aggressive in providing open content. About half of the $12 million has gone to enhance the ability of developing countries to take advantage of the open content and contribute to it

      It is awesome that this foundation is financially supporting OER! We need more financial supporters.