262 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2022
    1. variance is constrained as expressionvalues approach zero (Supplemental File), explaining the decrease in variance with age.

      yup that is what i was trying to get at

    2. We found that as the organism ages,most TF-TG pairs displayed a decrease in range (Figure 2D) but that the variance also decreased

      Could variance decrease because things are more "same"-y? Meaning that TF is consistently and precisely bad at regulating its target gene in a specific way?

    3. CC is expected to decrease with variability

      Ah so i misconstrued it up a bit– range does imply variability. Perhaps range and CC are directly correlated because there is more "breathing room" for the TF to regulate its target gene then?

    4. CC isexpected to increase with range.

      Counterintuitive to me– as max and min possibilities for an output diverge, shouldn't CC, aka the "precision" of TFs, decrease?

    5. noise can alternatively be defined as theinformation lost between input and output. We term this as ‘noise in input’ at the regulator end,20and ‘noise in output’ at the effector end

      Different definition of noise here!

    6. A higher Shannon entropy indicates that the probabilitydistribution of gene expression becomes more uniform, thereby decreasing the ability to reliablypredict gene expression.

      high shannon entropy = less signal, needs more clarification to understand what's going on. low entropy = more signal, can more easily understand what's going on

    7. Collectively, these data suggest that aging may be accompanied by areallocation of resources that favor messages crucial to maintenance of stability and survival.

      wow wow wow!

    1. Although the model is concise(an organism is considered as a simple set of cells)

      this is a flaw. need to account for ECM and other things outside of domain of cells

    Annotators

  2. Jul 2022

    Annotators

  3. Jun 2022
    1. We then generated 79,488 single cell transcriptomes from the SVZ neurogenic regionfrom young (5 month) and old (23 month),

      why so many more transcriptomes?

    2. However, shared genes carry a disproportionate weight within theclocks, with coefficients approximately 40% larger in magnitude

      do they "contribute" more to aging? is that what they're trying to say

    3. Even though all clocks were trained on aNSC-NPC‘proliferative fraction’, the microglia and oligodendrocytes biological age clocks performedbetter than aNSC-NPC ones.

      so the biological aging clock performed better on non trained cell types than the cell types it train on?

    1. One hypothesis is that general prolif-eration can combine with positional informationto up-regulate any regionally specified progenitorclass neara wound, regardless of whether its targettissue is missing

      To paraphrase, if a region of the planarian is wounded, local tissue specific neoblasts to that region will proliferate whether or not the tissue they compose is the one that is damaged

    2. issue-specific resection of planarianeyes does not cause up-regulation of eye progen-itors. In this case, eye regeneration is explainedby a constitutive basal rate of eye progenitor pro-duction and the fact that newly regenerating eyesare constituted by young cells and have fewertotal cells that could die per unit time

      there is a constant upkeep of progenitor cells for X tissue it seems. and when X tissue is damaged, newly produced progenitor cells from that regular rate of renewal come to the rescue (yet there is no upregulation of them it seems)

    3. he tgs-1 tran-script itself perdures in a subset of G1-annotatedneoblasts with neural markers;

      so is the lack of FSTF markers in pre mitotic neoblasts inconsistent. i.e. here in neural specialized neoblasts the marker is present during G1

    Annotators

  4. May 2022
    1. neoblast) being FSTF transcript-low and thesmedwi-1-low daughter (a postmitotic differen-tiating cell) being FSTF-transcript high

      so when a neoblast divides, one of the daughter cells differentiates (high FSTF) while the other stays neoblast (high smedwi-1)?

    2. In this model, a specialized neoblast can divideto produce cells with asymmetric outcomes,with one daughter being a neoblast capable ofchoosing a new fate in its next round of celldivision

      what does this mean

    3. Single-step fatemodel. Neoblasts can choose a fate and produce a differentiated cell in the course of a single cell division.

      so no transit amplifying cells like in humans

    4. Because a smallplanarian fragment must accomplish regenera-tion with existing mass, blastemas cannotregrow all missing tissues at their original scale

      like that deadpool scene? lol

    Annotators

  5. Mar 2022
    1. opens thequestion as to how regeneration signals instruct PSCs to pro-duce the appropriate number and type of progenitor neoblastsin response to different regeneration requirements.

      boy do i have a scientist for you...

    2. Therefore, high levels of PIWI-1 protein appear pri-marily associated with actively dividing cells,

      maybe why it's associated with cancer

    3. clonal expansion

      The clonal selection theory, as we know it today, posits that cells naturally and stochastically express antigen receptors (that is, without the influence of antigen), and that antigen drives the proliferation and differentiation of cells with specific antigen receptors.

    4. Only 7 out of120 injected neoblasts resulted in successful restoration of hostviability, suggesting extensive functional heterogeneity in theneoblast population

      was this an issue with the neoblast or the mouse

    5. ingle-cell transplantations demon-strated that a single neoblast is capable of rescuing lethally irra-diated hosts by reconstituting all cell types in the animal’s body

      so this one progenitor cell replicated and regenerated all of the damaged tissues in the mouse?

    Annotators

    1. However, 16/54 negative control compounds tested (i.e., those that did not induce MTF stress resistance) were also able to significantly increase fly lifespan (29.6% of the total compounds tested; p=0.07 for hits versus negative controls)

      Rip

    2. Among the 70 unique compounds that significantly increased MTF stress resistance that were tested in flies, 12 significantly increased fly lifespan in either or both sexes (17.1% of the total compounds tested)

      Very high ratio!!!

  6. Jan 2022

    Annotators

    1. As expected, all of these were increased with aging; however, their levels 273 did not decline in any of the two cohorts of very old-OSKM mice

      cellular senescence not reversed

    2. Interestingly, the large majority of genes 188 upregulated by OSKM in old mice (pink dots) corresponded to genes with 189 reduced expression upon aging

      why is this interesting?

    3. We conclude that a single period 172 of OSKM expression is able to rejuvenate a fraction of the methylation changes 173 that occur with aging in promoters and enhancers.

      would multiple cycles of partial reprogramming add on to this rejuvenation or would it be diminishing returns?

      would the same promoters be rolled back or would new ones be reprogrammed?

    4. the histological changes 81 observed in the pancreas after one week of OSKM induction were reversed two 82 weeks after removal of doxycycline

      one week of OSKM = partial reprogramming. two weeks OSKM = pluripotentcy (shown by expression of NANOG).

      Major changes in appearance of tissue (histology) reversed after 2 weeks

    5. dysplasia in which the tissue alters its normal architecture 66 and cells lose differentiation markers

      dysplasia = loss of identity; cell types non native to a tissue emerging

  7. Jul 2021
    1. (Or shelter hah) the end of the telomere from the DNA repair machinery: DNA looks like a continuous strand for most of its length except at the ends, so it is efficient for the cell to recognise 'ends' of this strand as breaks, and try to repair them. But of course you wouldn't want that in the end of the chromosome, because it's a legitimate feature. However, if true damage happens to the telomeric section, it's not going to be repaired, so telomeres steadily accumulate damage.

      I feel like this could be elaborated on. To my understanding, the shelterin protein on the ends of telomeres prevents telomeres from being repaired when they're actually damaged - is that what you mean?

    2. there is support for continued trials of metformin in humans, and there is some evidence that it could improve diseases associated with aging; however we still don't know if it would help with increasing maximum lifespan in humans.

      I would add that there is some evidence the earlier you take metoformin, the better its effect will be https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21386129/