There's a certain onanistic usage to the word "pseudoscience" among certain psychological types, similar to "racist," "sexist," etc. Midwit behavior. Nonetheless, what follow are claims that strike me as well-reasoned, but I'm not in the position to be sure about any perspective. The whole issue is just dripping with immobile priors, this author included, who strikes me as about as poised as a college freshman. Difficult to take seriously as a genuine thinker, which I would like to with an issue so interesting