4 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2020
  2. github.com github.com
    ryansolid/solid
    1
    1. TylerRick 09 Oct 2020
      Why struggle with custom Syntax DSLs when you can use one so widely supported?
      leverage the fact that tooling already exists benefiting from shared tooling that can be reused widely supported DSL syntax don't create a new syntax reinventing the wheel / not invented here
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    github.com/ryansolid/solid/blob/master/documentation/rendering.md
  3. Sep 2020
  4. github.com github.com
    sveltejs/rfcs
    1
    1. TylerRick 17 Sep 2020
      One of the arguments that's frequently deployed in favour of JSX-based frameworks over template-based ones is that JSX allows you to use existing language constructs:
      reuse existing language constructs prefer plain code over new template language don't create a new syntax it's just _ javascript
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    github.com/sveltejs/rfcs/blob/markup-constants/text/0000-markup-constants.md
  5. github.com github.com
    New template syntax · Issue #9 · sveltejs/rfcs
    1
    1. TylerRick 17 Sep 2020

      Proposes a syntax similar to JSX.

      My question would instead be, why not just use JSX for Svelte templates?

      don't create a new syntax JSX Svelte template language
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    github.com/sveltejs/rfcs/issues/9
  6. github.com github.com
    htmlx-org/HTMLx
    1
    1. TylerRick 17 Sep 2020
      It would also reduce friction for new users, who would no longer have to learn a new syntax for each new framework.
      friction approachable/easy for newcomers don't create a new syntax
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    github.com/htmlx-org/HTMLx