When it's in a list like this, appear to be a very quick process, and in some cases it might be, but for the most part, this probably take a long time to get from recruiting to isolating.

This article and the chapter written by Rheingold are not similar to each other. However this article is more of an example of the consequences for not using "crap detection" as Rheingold says.

Rheingold explains that kids that engage more on the internet develop a sense of skepticism (Rheingold 84). These kids are less likely to be drawn in by ISIS and to be convinced "to act on its behalf," (Berger)

Rhiengold says that kids who spend a lot of time on the internet "are partaking of a complex social system that uses knowledge exchange for competitive bonding as well as builds learning communities around the tools of their subculture's digital age," (Rheingold 87). People who spend more time on the internet are not going to be tricked by ISIS as they grew up knowing and understanding the rules of these social engagements.

Through a series of annotations, I will attempt to connect this article to "Crap Detection 101" from Net Smart - How to Thrive Online by Rheingold. Through this chapter, Rheingold informs readers about the danger not controlling attention while online and failing to "crap-detect" rumors (Rheingold).

An example of propaganda is a hashtag that promotes the ideology of ISIS. Rheingold explains that people can subscribe to hashtags on twitter (Rheingold 103). This allows for more people to find ISIS. They can also get connected to and follow persons involved in the organization as they can choose to only see tweets involving ISIS.

Rheingold expresses the need for professional confirmation of raw news since "anybody can send... a tweet... of breaking news" (Rheingold 94). When mainstream media produces legitimate news, it can quell the fake news and allow for the spread of accurate information. Thus the ISIS message is less likely to impact more people.

In his text, Rheingold explains that when one sees a link, they make a choice to either apply control of one's attention, or allow it to be captured. It is easy to be distracted by what is happening on social media or for one's attention to be "capture." By using social media, ISIS is probably able to use such techniques to find their recruits.

Rheingold explains that individuals tend to only pay attention to "sources that reinforce their own beliefs" (Rheingold 95). Since ISIS recruits individuals within certain parameters, there is probably little to no difficulty surrounding them in increasingly more radical opinions. Once these recruits start to believe such ideology, they would want to, as Rheingold claimed, surround themselves with online sources reaffirm their beliefs.

In his text, Rheingold shares an anecdote in which he is talking to his daughter about web searches and he says " you can get fooled into believing all kinds of wrong things if you don' t know how to tell the difference between the good an the bad stuff" (Rheingold). This is most likely how ISIS discovers "potential recruits." They could be people who do not know the difference between good stuff and bad stuff.

The article does not seem to follow this method of the of analysis as it does not use any of these ways to describe the CRT. It also mainly focuses on the history of the CRT instead of describing and analyzing it. Though certain aspects of the analysis are in the article. For example, research is very apparent through the text.

This appears to be the definition of material culture. It describes that the attitudes and beliefs come from both the maker and the culture from which it came. The article about the CRT shows how the attitudes and beliefs toward it affected how long it was in use.

This is probably not the only method to describe material culture, but Haltman claims it is the most efficient and effective.

The description of the object is the primary resource as opposed to the object itself.

I think Haltman is saying that you must use your own ideas or opinions when describing material culture. Lepawsky seems to hold an impartial opinion toward the CRT throughout the article.

The CRTs most likely had an emotional impact on families as it was a center piece for a family room, and families gathered around to watch broadcasts. This could be a testament to the emotional connection of material culture.

Haltman talks about how "intellectual detective work" (Haltman) can lead to a pattern of use. The CRT article talks about how the CRT was used and the different technological advances that stem from it.

Haltman describes that objects should be described in an active, but the article about CRT uses a passive voice for descriptions. It uses terms like "was introduced" or "has entailed.

Remarks about the picture act as the attitude towards the event; therefore, the remarks symbolize culture.

The article by Josh Lepawsky about the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) does not seem to show how the material culture (CRT) expresses or showcases a polarity.

This appears to be the definition of material culture. It describes that the attitudes and beliefs come from both the maker and the culture from which it came.

This is probably not the only method to describe material culture, but Haltman claims it is the most effective or efficient.

The article about the CRT does not seem to follow the Prownian Analysis as it does not use any of these ways to describe the CRT.

The descriptions of the object is the primary resource as opposed to the object itself?

I think Haltman is saying that you must use your own ideas to describe material culture.

The CRT had an emotional impact on families as it was a center piece for a family room and families gathered around to watch broadcasts. This could be a testament to the emotional connection.

Haltman talks about how "intellectual detective work" (Haltman) can lead to a pattern of use. The CRT article talks about how the CRT was used and the different technological advances that stem from it.

Haltman describes that objects should be described in an active voice, but the article about the CRT uses a passive voice for descriptions. For example, "CRTs were introduced..." or "CRT has entailed..." (Lepawsky).

Remarks about the picture act as the attitude towards the event. Therefore, the remarks symbolize culture.

The article about the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) by Josh Lepawsky does not seem to show how the CRT expresses a polarity as material culture.

Did they know that working with these machines could be harmful? If so, this could have been societies way of saying that women were not as valuable as men, so they were stuck with the difficult and dangerous job. It is ironic in retrospect because looking back, women were portrayed as delicate and domestic, yet they were given physically and emotionally taxing jobs, which I am sure they all excelled at, with no credit for being.

The CRTs most likely were the inspiration for much of modern technology, at least indirectly. Modern digital technology is basically an evolved version of the very first computers.This also means that without the invention of the CRT, society today probably would not have been as interconnected as it is.

It is fascinating that these lasted for such a long time. Technology is always advancing; inventors are always trying to create something new and cost efficient to make. The fact that it took such a long time to replace the CRTs is surprising.

1968 and today are not so different. People are still fighting for their rights and beliefs to be recognized by society and government.

1968 did not just yield negative events; some good things came about that year.

I did not realize that there was a lot of violence happening in other parts of the world. I have always thought of it as something only occurring within United States and areas that the U.S was occupying (i.e Vietnam).

It 's funny how, even in times of aggression and violence, things like the Olympic games occur.

This could foreshadow that the article/pictures will explain or express that there were a lot of issues.