4 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2018
    1. western archaeologists,

      Why is studying by "western" archaeologists important?

    2. Clovis sites are some of the earliest scientific evidence archaeologists have of the occupation of North America.

      The wording here-" Some of the earliest scientific evidence"- is definitely wording we (in Bad Archaeology) have been taught to avoid using for its associations with negative archaeology.

  2. Sep 2018
    1. Indifference to context remains a stubborn problem in the field, despite its move toward the social history of art.

      This is insanity to me. How is this still an issue? I guess when looking at public movements in the past, the evidence of stubborn reluctance to take drastic change and action is still evident. Yes that would be a political shift, but what about archaeology? How immediate would consequences be, whether positive or negative, with the adoption and honesty of context within the realm of archaeology?

    2. Roman artists and patrons deliberately chose particular styles that they thought were appropriate to the ideas they wished to express

      The notion of creating fluidity and flexibility within a narrative is not as harmless as it seems at first glance. The aspect of control that is granted to the producer of that narrative is unfeasible.