2 Matching Annotations
- May 2024
-
meta.stackexchange.com meta.stackexchange.com
-
I wouldn't focus too much on "posted only after human review" - it's worth noting that's that's worth nothing. We literally just saw a case of obviously riduculous AI images in a scientific paper breezing through peer review with noone caring, so quality will necessarily go down because Brandolini's law combined with AI is the death sentence for communities like SE and I doubt they'll employ people to review content from the money they'll make
-
- Mar 2024
-
arstechnica.com arstechnica.com
-
The AI-generated feedback goes to teacher review before being passed on to students so that a human remains in the loop.
-