8 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2021
  2. stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
    Relation passed to #or must be structurally compatible. Using an instance variable
    1
    1. TylerRick 10 Jul 2021
      ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    stackoverflow.com/questions/57184014/relation-passed-to-or-must-be-structurally-compatible-using-an-instance-variab
  3. Feb 2021
  4. github.com github.com
    refactoring deck policy due to https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/… · zcallanan/rails-flash_cards@775e5e0
    1
    1. TylerRick 05 Feb 2021
      ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible workaround
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    github.com/zcallanan/rails-flash_cards/commit/775e5e09e1e36aa8ac69b9d08e1b4156c02d7304
  5. stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
    Relation passed to #or must be structurally compatible. Incompatible values: [:left_outer_joins] rails
    1
    1. TylerRick 04 Feb 2021
      ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible I have this problem too
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    stackoverflow.com/questions/64241336/relation-passed-to-or-must-be-structurally-compatible-incompatible-values-l
  6. stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
    Relation passed to #or must be structurally compatible. Incompatible values: [:joins]
    1
    1. TylerRick 04 Feb 2021
      ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    stackoverflow.com/questions/54494079/relation-passed-to-or-must-be-structurally-compatible-incompatible-values-j
  7. stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
    ArgumentError (Relation passed to #or must be structurally compatible. Incompatible values: [:select])
    1
    1. TylerRick 04 Feb 2021
      ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    stackoverflow.com/questions/57418957/argumenterror-relation-passed-to-or-must-be-structurally-compatible-incompati
  8. stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
    Relation passed to #or must be structurally compatible. Incompatible values: [:references]
    1
    1. TylerRick 04 Feb 2021
      ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    stackoverflow.com/questions/40742078/relation-passed-to-or-must-be-structurally-compatible-incompatible-values-r
  9. github.com github.com
    Inconsistent results with #or in ActiveRecord::Relation with respect to documentation · Issue #24055 · rails/rails
    1
    1. TylerRick 04 Feb 2021
      ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible issues I'm watching
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    github.com/rails/rails/issues/24055
  10. github.com github.com
    Allow `Relation#or` to accept a relation with different `references` · rails/rails@ea61391
    1
    1. TylerRick 04 Feb 2021
      ActiveRecord: or ActiveRecord: or: relations must be structurally compatible
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    github.com/rails/rails/commit/ea6139101ccaf8be03b536b1293a9f36bc12f2f7