may always prohibit the expression of an idea whenever society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable
I cant find the exact part where it specifies always being able to prohibit expression when its offensive or disagreeable. but I definitely think this is wrong
Thomas: concurring O'Connor: dissenting Breyer: dissenting (with Stevens and Souter) Souter: dissenting (with Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer) Stevens: dissenting
O'Connor did not dissent, here is the correct conclusions:
OPINION OF THE COURT: Rehnquist CONCURRING OPINIONS: O’Connor, Thomas DISSENTING OPINIONS: Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter, Stevens