2 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. This finding argues for specific recognition of the PAM sequence by Cas9 as a prerequisite for target DNA binding and possibly strand separation to allow strand invasion and R-loop formation, which would be analogous to the PAM sequence recognition by CasA/Cse1 implicated in a type I CRISPR/Cas system (34).

      "Possibly strand separation" The authors do a good job here of not over-claiming what the results from these experiments are unable show. These results in aggregate show which sequences are needed for DNA cleavage and suggest a role in specifically dsDNA editing, but do not show the mechanism for opening the dsDNA strands.

    2. Cleavage assays using these substrates showed that Cas9-catalyzed DNA cleavage was particularly sensitive to mutations in the PAM sequence on the noncomplementary strand of the DNA, in contrast to complementary strand PAM recognition by type I CRISPR/Cas systems (18, 34). Cleavage of target single-stranded DNAs was unaffected by mutations of the PAM motif. This observation suggests that the PAM motif is required only in the context of target dsDNA and may thus be required to license duplex unwinding, strand invasion, and the formation of an R-loop structure.

      This helps us to understand that the PAM has a very specific function in the CRISPR-Cas system. It enables the selective editing of dsDNA, specifically the DNA in foreign sequences (self sequences won't have a PAM next to the target). ssDNA is not as common so the system being able to edit ssRNA but not dsDNA without a PAM sequence is not surprising because there is no clear mechanism for evolutionary feedback to evolve a mechanism to prevent self targeting of ssDNA.