- Nov 2020
I'm still calling this v1.00 as this is what will be included in the first print run.
There seems to be an artificial pressure and a false assumption that the version that gets printed and included in the box be the "magic number" 1.00.
But I think there is absolutely nothing bad or to be ashamed of to have the version number printed in the rule book be 1.47 or even 2.0. (Or, of course, you could just not print it at all.) It's just being transparent/honest about how many versions/revisions you've made. ￼
- false assumptions
- artificial pressure
- too much importance placed on something
- magic values
- focused too much on the wrong thing
- too much ceremony/bureaucracy
- Oct 2020
focuses way too much on the getter/tracking part of the equation which is really the part you want reduce the mental bandwidth on