4 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2025
    1. Fair use weighs heavily in favor of educational uses. So in most cases, using images and/or videos you’ve found online for your presentation for class is not going to land you in hot water. Why is this? Using an image or video that belongs to somebody else without permission for an educational use is not likely to impact the potential market, it is only being shared with the people in your class, and it is being used to educate yourself and others. It is still always good practice to cite where the content came from and try to use openly licensed content that allows people to use it without seeking permission first (see “Creative Commons” section below) whenever possible.

      This text helped me understand that using images or videos found online for school projects is generally allowed under "fair use." I hadn't realized that, as long as it's for educational and non-profit purposes, using someone else's work is usually fine. I also learned that it's important to credit the source of the content and use content under open licenses, like Creative Commons, when possible, to avoid copyright issues

    1. By incorporating the name of the author of the evidence the research writer is referring to here, the source of this paraphrase is now clear to the reader. Furthermore, because there is a page number at the end of this sentence, the reader understands that this passage is a paraphrase of a particular part of Callahan’s essay and not a summary of the entire essay. Again, if the research writer had introduced this source to his readers earlier, he could have started with a phrase like “Callahan suggests...” and then continued on with his paraphrase

      This article explains why it's important to credit a paraphrase by including the author's name and a page number. I hadn't previously realized that a page number lets readers know that the paraphrase is from a specific part of the text, not the whole thing. Also new: if the author has already credited the source, they can use phrases like "Callahan suggests..." instead of repeating the full quotes. This improves the flow of the writing and helps readers understand the source of the information while still respecting the rules for citing sources.

    1. mportant Reminder! Whether summary, paraphrase, or quotation, you need to use an in-text citation! For every in-text citation, ensure there is a matching entry on the Works Cited page! Also, remember to use information from sources only to support your own argument. For a research essay, a healthy ratio is generally no more than 10% to 20% material from sources to 80% your own original ideas, argument, interpretation, analysis, and explanation. This is not a rule as much as a reminder to think critically about how much your writing relies on the ideas of others: unless the assignment is a summary or literature

      The text raises an important point regarding the balance between using sources and contributing original ideas in writing a research paper. It emphasizes that, while it is essential to support one's argument with information from sources, one should not rely too heavily on them, preferring instead to prioritize one's own ideas, analyses, and interpretations. This is a perspective I hadn't fully considered regarding a healthy balance between external sources and original thinking. I hadn't realized that relying too heavily on the ideas of others could weaken my argument or reduce my own contribution to the discussion.

    1. mmary, as discussed earlier in this chapter, is useful for “broadstrokes” or quick overviews, brief references, and providing plot or character background. When you summarize, you reword and condense another author’s writing. Be aware, though, that summary also requires individual thought: when you reword, it should be a result of you processing the idea yourself, and when you condense, you must think critically about which parts of the text are most important. As you can see in the example that follows one summary shows understanding and puts the original into the author’s own words; the other summary is a result of a passive rewording, where the author only substituted synonyms for the original.

      A new perspective is emerging: summarizing requires personal processing of the content, which helps you better understand key concepts. I used to think that summarizing was all about condensing information, but now I understand that it's also about interpreting and highlighting the key points. This insight will definitely help me be more intentional about writing my own summaries.