3 Matching Annotations
- Jan 2018
-
doc-0g-c0-docs.googleusercontent.com doc-0g-c0-docs.googleusercontent.com
-
Finds that the public interest is not served by adding to the already-voluminous record in this proceeding additional materials, including confidential materials submitted in other proceedings
Stating that the public isn't interested in seeing the information from other proceedings similar to this since there is a lot of record already.
-
Finds that transparency, combined with market forces as well as antitrust and consumer protection laws, achieve benefits comparable to those of the 2015 “bright line” rules at lower cost.
The FCC is trying to push that it's cheaper for the companies (ISP's) to not tell their users about everything and be completely "transparent"
-
Requires that ISPs disclose information about their practices to consumers, entrepreneurs, and the Commission, including any blocking, throttling, paid prioritization, or affiliated prioritization
Currently, the ISP's have to notify internet users about any changes they make to the service; however, that would be taken away if this passes.
-