1 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2021
    1. The ultimate solution probably requires incentives that provide enough deterrence to eliminate such misconduct proactively rather than treating it reactively.

      There seems to be a lack of consequences when these deeds are done. Reputations are tarnished in the moment, but then forgotten. There is a new NISO work item on handling corrections. If those retractions and corrections are tied to ORCID identifiers, could this data be aggregated into actionable information in review workflows?