I wish you way more than luck.
I found Wallace’s message about conscious awareness really powerful. His point that we have a choice in how we perceive and interpret everyday situations like a frustrating trip to the grocery store made me reflect on how often I default to frustration instead of empathy. It’s a reminder that practicing awareness can shift our whole experience of the world, even in the most mundane moments.
amg_cycle
docstring - also use of exec is not recommended. please expand parameters into keyword args.
iterative_solve
docsting
coarsen_A(
docstring
def restriction(N, shape):
Add comment describing what this function does and what the parameters do
restrictions
missing docstring here
coarse point nearest to the camera in the bottom
perhaps indicate this explicitly in the figure
OpenMG: A New Multigrid Implementation in Python
Quality of the approach: meets Quality of the writing: meets Quality of the figures/tables: meets
Is the code made publicly available and does the article sufficiently describe how to access it? yes
Does the article present the problem in an appropriate context? Specifically, does it:
Is the content of the paper accessible to a computational scientist with no specific knowledge in the given field?
the article does provide some background that made it easier for me to follow, but i do not have sufficient expertise in Galerkin discretization approaches, but the general idea of using multi resolution solvers to iteratively approximate the true solution was conveyed in the article.
Does the paper describe a well-formulated scientific or technical achievement?
yes
Are the technical and scientific decisions well-motivated and clearly explained? Are the code examples (if any) sound, clear, and well-written?
yes. the code examples can be improved with better Python standards as noted.
Is the paper factual correct? Is the language and grammar of sufficient quality? Are the conclusions justified?
yes
Is prior work properly and fully cited?
i cannot comment on this.
Should any part of the article be shortened or expanded? Please explain. In your view, is the paper fit for publication in the conference proceedings? Please suggest specific improvements and indicate whether you think the article needs a significant rewrite (rather than a minor revision).
yes
OpenMG
include URL here
overall accuracy
how is accuracy evaluated? is it simply || Au^\hat - b ||_2?