Chorus stems from chora, and chora [khôra] is a potent term in my field of rhetoric, meaning, variously, the discovery of ideas, the space outside the walls of the city where ideas are born, or as a place of “emerging possibility”.
'Khora' another new word - one that @googleguacamole would like ;)
with three or four or howevermany versions of a document.
Okay. Here I can only work with one version of the document. A difference from FW
“only one valid set of relationships, inscribed by the author.”
keeping links within the document but letting every person have as many copies of that document as they like, with whatever links they want on each.
So like I do here in hypothesis? I have a copy of the page and can add opposing views, cat pics or whatever...why use fedwiki specifically though?
[L]inks as imagined by the heirs of Bush — Engelbart, Nelson, Van Dam — formed a layer of annotation on documents that were by and large a separate entity.
But it does place links on an independent layer
Paratexts.
For all the breadth the web and hypertext promises, it is still limited by single authors getting their stuff out there as their single perspective
because as the author I chose what/where to embed? I had not thought about the idea of finding links the 'author may not want you to find'. This would be possible if independent layer - ha, neat.