3 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. The sheer volume of Alexander’s output can make it hard to say anything overly categorical (epistemic status: treading carefully), but there is some evidence to support the idea that he, like anyone, is wont to sacrifice rigor in moments of passion.

      Exactly! Tied back to 'rationalists' being used as a sub-culture and pseudo-intellectualism. Additionally, many words do not make a coherent philosophy (if you want to call it that).

    2. Perhaps the largest share of its attention is devoted to metacognitive elucidations of the tools of reason, and the heroic effort to purge oneself of common biases and fallacies. The community grew comfortable with its own private lexicon, one almost designed to be daunting to outsiders unfamiliar with the concepts of “pareidolia” or the “motte-and-bailey fallacy.”

      An unfortunate, messy mix of pseudo-intellectualism with some very good ideas, research and conceptualizations but without a strong structural base.