alog ou s. All of these are ess ent iall y pro prie tary inst itu tio ns, in themo ra l se ns e. The y do no t, at leas t as reg ards on e part icul ar sub ject , acce pt the princi ple sof fre ed om of inqu iry , of op in ion, an d of tea chi ng; and the ir pu rpos e is not to advan cekn owle dge by the unrest rict ed res earch and un fet ter ed di scus sio n of impar tial inves tig a-to rs, but rat he r to subs id ize th e pro motio n of op ini ons held by the pers ons, usua lly not ofth e schol ar’s cal li ng, who pr ov id e the fund s for
Therefore, a university that heeds the precepts of free inquiry is thus empowered by academic freedom - if an institution gives up this 'neutrality' and cleaves to a political or commercial perspective, they yield up their freedom (essentially they forfeit the privileges because they fail to uphold their obligations).