6 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2020
    1. he paper concludes that an intentional design strategy, such as embedding academic skills into the curriculum, helps bridge the different expectations between academics and students in the teaching and learning of academic skills, and hence constitutes a socially inclusive strategy to teaching professional courses such as social work, within higher education

      This is highly beneficial as it give a 'preview'of what is going o be assessed in the paper and what the educator will be looking for to mark. It contributes to the socially inclusive strategy. It also looks at the academic skills embedded in the curriculum.

    1. As far as I can tell, open educational practice captures the true potential of OER to improve teaching and learning. Now that adoption of OER has been maturing and expanding, more people are interested in how to use OER more effectively. In other words, they’re asking what can OER do that traditional textbooks cannot? Groups like the Wiki Education Foundation and Open Osmosis are pushing the boundary on how OER is used in the classroom, giving students authentic learning experiences that have real impact in the world. These organizations are helping teachers move away from disposable assignments and engaging students with open content in authentic ways that improve the learning experience.

      When looking at replacing textbooks with OER's it is deemed to be beneficial in the sense that these foundations are pushing the boundaries when it comes to authentic learning. It is giving teachers move away from rote teaching and giving them an opportunity for more engagement with learners on an open level which will increase the learning experience.

    1. Yet, because anyone can write a Wikipedia entry, it’s often highly stigmatized in academic communities. This latest study, however, shows that if consumed carefully, Wikipedia can be a legitimate resource.

      The information should always be interpreted using CARS etc. This is needed as any person make changes to a wikipedia document containing information therefore all findings should be double checked and unbiased.

    1. Although most of these editors are undoubtedly intelligent and passionate about enhancing the accuracy of Wikipedia, the site falls far short of its ideals of providing “the sum of all human knowledge” without the broad perspectives that a more diversified pool of editors would bring.

      This is true as a reliable source needs to be unbiased and have reliable information from all spheres.

    1. The reliability of Wikipedia (predominantly of the English-language edition) has frequently been questioned and often assessed. The reliability has been tested statistically, through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in the editing process unique to Wikipedia.[1] Incidents of conflicted editing, and the use of Wikipedia for 'revenge editing' (inserting false, defamatory or biased statements into biographies) have attracted publicity.[2][3]

      The reliability of Wikipedia can in fact be seen as questionable as ant 'edits' can be made to the document/ any information displayed on the web page,

    1. The most relevant point in the article. It is very seldom people look at the negative impact of technology in our lives. Technology, depending on how it is used could in fact have a huge impact on the behavior as well as communication of all parties involved

      LiDA101