within the internal perspective. They are first-order claims about what is right or wrong in specific counterfactual conditions, and can thus be glossed in expressivist terms. This is underpinned by the fact that our moral attitudes respond to natural features of the world. We judge that kicking dogs is wrong because of the pain they suffer when kicked, not because we happen to disapprove of such behaviour. Quasi-realists can therefore hold that kicking dogs remains wrong in worlds at which our counterparts approve of it, for o
.kjgjjhk