23 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2021
    1. both copyright and professional norms. A historical work without owners and with multiple, anonymous authors is thus al- most unimaginable in our professional culture. Yet, quite remarkably, that describes the

      all of this is so shocking to me, its like an academic culture shock. most of the papers I read for my major are scientific so they have a laundry list of authors and whole paragraphs if not a few pages just dedicated to reviewing past researchers works and discoveries in order to explain what is already known about the thing they are investigating and to identify the holes in the literature. its hard to imagine a scholarly work that is 'possessive' rather than collaborative.

    1. What is far less convincing is that they are able to function as critical analysts and able, autonomous producers of knowledge

      Even though we've grown up on the internet and created a culture on it there definitely is a problem of a lack of critical analysis on the internet. In a psyc class im taking I read a study on how when people are given a news headline preview as it would appear on facebook with random share comments attached to it (that has misleading information in it) most people would get their information from the comments, even though the facts they were being asked about were included in the news headline preview.

    2. It is about relating the past to the present.

      This is what changed my mind about history. When I was being taught history in grade school I couldn't understand why it was an important subject. To me it seemed like a class where they just wanted us to be able to recite important people, dates, and events, thats how our tests were structured, so I never got anything more out of history besides that. As the world got more crazy and it began to feel like we were living through history and I started to take college history classes I got a new understanding and appreciation for history. History is the lense in which we contextualize the world we live in now. It reminds us that no major event that we see in the news today is born out of nothing, we can look back at our past and see the steps that were taken to create the climate that we live in.

    3. ephemeral historical experience

      this phrase makes me think of a popular internet phrase which I think embodies a similar idea; "a cultural reset", which is a specific moment (like a performance, event, or fashion look) that is in some way original or spectacular and usually marks a shift in aesthetic, humor, or trends

  2. Jan 2021
    1. The degree of surveillance these tools allow requires us to think carefully about issues of consent and comfort; it demands that researchers--faculty and students alike--trust each other to make decisions about the when, where, what, and even if of their work.

      agree, it can feel a bit embarrassing to be working on a collab google doc or something and have someone correct something or delete something you just put down. I think as group projects and collabs continue to be shifted over into the digital space where you are able to see and edit each other's work simultaneously/instantaneously we will begin to develop a set of rules and manners to abide by as team members to try and lessen those discomforts and embarrassing moments (corona has probably sped that up too as we have all been shifted upruptly to online)

    2. And yet, undergraduate researchers voiced a desire for someone to “look over their shoulders” and ensure they were using appropriate tags and sub-tags

      I know I as an undergrad would definitely want someone there to overlook what I was doing and making sure that I'm doing it correctly, but that experience of someone pushing you to take the lead and having no one to hold your hand is probably a really valuable growing experience.

    3. These challenges encourage team members to develop research agency — to identify and claim individual interests; to pursue primary research based on those interests; to present their research in academic forums; and to add their voices to scholarly communities across varied platforms including conferences, publications, and social media

      So digital resources allows team members more agency? I wonder if that's because of digital investigating is so much easier to do it allows multiple people to each pursue their own interest rather than everyone collaborate to answer one main researcher's question?

    4. f the “digital” in your DH project isn’t causing discomfort, you’re doing something wrong. Digital discomfort — any intellectual, inter/intrapersonal, pedagogical, and emotional discomfort mediated by the digital — is not only useful to DH research, it’s crucial

      I'm. not sure what they mean by digital discomfort? is it difficulty navigating digital resources?

    1. The historian more often finds herselfforced to listen to other people’s con-cerns when queuing for a crowded bus than when scrolling from the comfort ofhome

      the local people who remember their history and who continue to feel the effects of their history should be seriously accounted for when interpreting history

    2. Being forced to acknowledge one’s ignorance early and often is the gift of-fered by academic exchange, whether across borders or within them

      retweet

    3. what the historian catches will depend, partly on chance, butmainly on what part of the ocean he chooses to fish in and what tackle he chooses touse

      I really like this quote, when historians are trying to capture a significant event or moment in history its impossible for them to capture all the details and nuances that influenced that moment, and so their interpretation will be shaped by which details and influences they decide to hone in on

    1. Most social media platforms are commercial entities, so saving these conversations requires understanding terms of service for each platform, user rights, and advanced technical knowledge to harvest conversation streams

      I never imagined how much technology/digital knowledge may be needed to document current history (especially the history of society, and everyday people rather than larger political events)

    2. in 2008 by a team led by Ned Katz to facilitate collaboratively-written histories of the LGBTQ community.

      while there are bigger groups and organizations that lobby and fight for the LGBT community and for LGBT rights, I feel like a significant part of the community interact with each other and find connections to each other through social media and other internet resources, and that these individuals contribute a lot to the discourse and culture within the community. It will be interesting to see how future historians will go about trying to comb through old social media posts and data because theres so much of it, but I do feel that so much happens on social media, especially today, that it can't be ignored.

    3. links to digitized primary sources; visualizations of historical data in maps, graphs, or charts; and narrative threads that work together to address historical questions in ways not possible in print monographs or exhibition catalogues.

      very cool, i would love to interact with a site like this

    4. collaborate with students and community groups, including African American churches,

      thats amazing that these researchers really did their due diligence to uncover the history of african american political activism, especially since black activism and political movements have been purposely suppressed, ignored and forgotten in our history

    5. digital history has grown into a subfield of its own

      living in the modern technological age, wouldn't all historians use computers, databases, archives, and other technology to do their work and research? so what makes digital history its own subfield? Are their other historians who go out of their way to not make use of technology?

    6. Digital history is an approach to researching and interpreting the past that relies on computer and communication technologies to help gather, quantify, interpret, and share historical materials and narratives.

      I had assumed that digital history was about the short and recent history of the digital world and how it has helped affect and create the world that we live in today, a bit surprised to learn that its actually an approach to engaging with history.

    1. Digital literacy is invaluable no matter where your career takes you

      As the younger generations that grew up with technology continue to enter the workforce it will be interesting to see how they will stack up against their colleagues with their technological skills, and if technology will be implemented into careers even more

    1. You may discover, through them, online databases and sources that you were previously unaware of

      I love this aspect of the internet, its so vast and people find their own corners of the internet they like to occupy and so their always so much we can share with each other, and learn from each other

    1. In one experiment, students told they’d be graded on how well they learned a social studies lesson had more trouble understanding the main point of the text than did students who were told that no grades would be involved. 

      I've never noticed how knowing you are going to be tested on something later can affect how you read or listen to something, but now that I hear this I can definitely see the truth in this. When I'm in class it can be hard to detect what information is worthy to write down in my notes to be memorized later, and it can make the whole learning process a chore and more tedious. But often in my free time I like to watch informational videos on youtube, especially things like evolutionary theory, history, or sometimes just think pieces on different fandoms or social issues, and I've always found that I'm able to retain and appreciate that information more than the stuff I learn in a typical classroom setting.