But he’s not completely sold on it; he wonders whether communities will be trained to use the technology and keep the printer to continue to build houses after the companies have moved on. This, he said, will determine "whether they’re just providing housing to people or whether they’re also providing skills or training.”
This is the negative view of 3-d printing and whether companies are doing this to make themselves look good. That is why I think the article did a better job of understanding how bad homelessness is. This article feels like they are just throwing out ideas that may work, but might not be the best solution.