33 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2019
    1. In an ideal world, professional historians would serve as the primary designers and procedural authors of these virtual spaces. It would be unrealistic, however, to assume that a historian could master all the technical requirements to construct a virtual reality display alone. This would be like one person designing, contracting, and building a sky-scraper. It would be more realistic to assume that the historian-as the procedural author-would serve as the "architect" of the virtual reality edifice, the one who conceives of and designs the structure that others construct. Unfortunately, it is just as likely that, as with many "historical" films researched by historians but ultimately designed by nonhistorians, historians working with virtual reality are more than likely to play a supporting role as consulting members of a collaborative team directed by nonhistorians.

      This idea of a team to reconstruct historical sites is a very good idea but may not be necessary, depending on what software is used. We've seen in class how software like ArcGIS can be used by people without a technical background so it may or may not be necessary to have a team of people with diverse skills, depending on the project that's being worked on.

    2. Were we able to listen to the acoustics of a virtual re-creation, for example, our understanding of the qualities of that space would be enhanced. Sonic and hap tic interfaces would situate the sensations of the body in space as important for making certain kinds of historical arguments and scholarly observations about the past

      This statement makes me question why the author mentioned the point that I annotated earlier - if you agree that adding more sensory details can enhance your experience, then shouldn't you agree that a virtual model is a step up from just a book?

    3. Despite our best efforts, we can never hope to make the past truly "come to life." Virtual reality as a model for historical inquiry opens up new vistas of interpretation, but it is as limited as any other representation of the past.

      I disagree with this statement. I do think that there is some limit to the visual medium, but I don't think that there is as much limit as compared to something like a book or journal. Seeing a visual representation of something is a lot better than just reading it in a book and having to imagine it yourself.

    1. The Dillingham Commission recommended that Congress enact re-strictions on immigration, principally because of what it claimed to be the unassimilable character of recent migrants. This unassimilability differentiated them from the older type of immigrants. It wanted tougher assessment of potential immigrants in their country of origin, to find out about criminal records and mental aptitude.

      This entire section of Recommendations seems exclusionary of immigrants. It seems to be that the immigrants are not to be seen and not heard, but rather seen and heard - if they are seen or heard doing the wrong thing (anything that isn't considered "american"), however, then the punishments are harsh.

    2. To assess assimilation, three measures were employed by the Dillingham Commission:54 learning English, acquiring U.S. citizen-ship, and more nebulously, the abandoning of native customs. On all three criteria, the new immigrants were found wanting. In addition, patterns of home ownership were contrasted between new and old immigrants, with the Commission concluding that "as a rule the races of older immigration from Great Britain and northern Europe are more extensive home owners as a whole than the members of races of recent immigration."55 The failure of new immigrants to assimilate was explained by the absence of families and the predominance of sin-gle men: "i

      Similar to how we spoke about the impossible task of trying to one society's definition of insane to classify another society, assimilation can't really be determined by a concrete action or test.

    3. "social observation" coincided is not ex-plained. One measure of political radicalism commonly cited by crit-ics of immigration was radical newspapers in foreign languages. The numbers of these publications increased throughout the 1900s and 1910s; a survey in 1922 found that the number doubled after 1918 (see Table 3.1).

      Xenophobia because of radicalization in a language that isn't English is a problem that is still seen today. How drastically have the numbers changed from then to now?

    1. By the 1910s, the medical routine had changed. The importance of phys-ical indicators of mental illness in alignment with the abovementioned new approach in psychiatry affected the daily visits in Toptaşı Asylum. This system was significantly different from the one applied in Süleymaniye Asylum and during the earlier years at Toptaşı Asylum. For instance, the daily medical visits were no longer public. What replaced them were more individualistic; they were done at the patient’s bedside. The responses of the patient were no longer the primary means of diagnosis; physical indicators and other factors replaced them. Everything was “objectively” recorded, and hung on the patient’s head plate (see Figure 7). The medical staff worked independently, but hierarchically, reporting within a complex but regulated organizational chart. Assistant physi-cians prepared the patients for the physicians, a practice that prevailed for many decades to come, particularly in university hospitals. There was also a pharma-cist assigned to each section, who would be present at the time of the visit, record the prescription in a notebook, and have the physician approve the medication.

      What was the impact of these changes?

    2. An 1875 document by a “Commission,”16 written as a response to a crisis after the Asylum administration refused to admit around twenty patients and returned them to the police, confirms the condition of the building.17the report identified a number of problems: capacity shortfall, building’s state of disrepair made it inadequate for use, and insufficient funds for day-to-day expenses, including patients and attendants’ needs.

      Based on what we've been reading over the last couple of weeks in class, it seems that there are essentially two types of asylums in terms of condition: ones where there's very little care put into them and others where the upmost security and confinement measures are taken.

    3. Figure 3: 1893 Expansion Project. Drawing showing: Top left: Elevation of the female section (E), Bottom left: Plan of the second-floor addition of the female section (E), Top right: Elevation of a new male section (L), Bottom right: First and second floor plans of a new male section (L).

      Regardless of the society that we study during this class, the structure of the rooms for these asylums tends to look the same.

    4. The reorganization of the asylum’s space and time, as mundane as they might seem, offers novel insights into the functioning of the asylum, and, in turn, into the theory and practice of Ottoman psychiatry

      Understanding the medical treatment of the mentally ill in any society cans serve as a model for what medical practices the society does in general

    1. Indian institutions, just like private European homes in the East, were inhabited by a great number of servants, wardens, gardeners, cooks, cooks' assistants, punkah-wallahs,71 and numerous other staff, with pets such as deer and monkeys being allowed to 'kindle natives' gentler sentiments', and with water-carriers and sweepers and night-soil removers creating an atmo-sphere, that would not fit in too well with the idea of a Foucaultian panop-ticon nor with the ideal prototype of the asylum as refuge and retreat, as advocated by representatives of the asylum reform movement in Britain dur-ing the early nineteenth century.7R

      Are there any Primary Sources that can explain how these types of Asylums were run from the inside?

    2. The spatial expression of madness in British India was defined both by race and issues of social class, caste, and communal background.

      I understand how you can view race through some of these factors, but not all of them.

    3. TICAL GEOGRAPHY OF RACIAL DISTANCE: MAINTAINING PRESTIGE BY MAINTAINING DISTAN

      Using Geography as a means to explore racism is something that I agree can be done. One example that I would point to is the Design of New York City by Robert Moses, which was done with the intention of keeping minorities out of the main part of the city.

  2. Sep 2019
    1. The aim then was to find a programme that could automatically link the database of plague mortality to the data from the census. In this way, we hoped, it would be possible to dem­onstrate clearly the chronological spread of plague and also to show clearly the relationship between patterns of mortality and morbidity and the socioeconomic and topographical profile of different streets within the parish. This was where the DECIMA project came in.

      One has to wonder how accurate this data is, given that it's attempting to model a city from centuries ago.

    2. DECIMA in order to map the spread of the plague through San Lorenzo, explaining some of the problems he encountered and the methodologies he devel­oped while working with Henderson's extensive database

      What are the main differences between these different type of mapping technologies? I forget the name of the one that was discussed last week, but it seems like different mapping techniques can yield different insights about the data they're using.

    1. Besides, I was sur-rounded by others in like bewil-dered, discontented mental states in whose miseries . . . I found my-self becoming interested, my sym-pathies becoming aroused. . . . And at the same time, I too, was treated as an insane woman, a kindness not hitherto shown to me.

      Interesting how this is the first time we get the perspective of the people in these asylums and it seems to contrast greatly to the passages we've read in the past. You would expect this first hand account to tell about all of the horrors and monstrosities that are inside of an asylum but this passage shows the opposite.

    2. The movement for deinstitutionaliza-tion, starting as a trickle in the 1960s, became a flood by the 1980s, even though it was clear by then that it was creating as many problems as it solved. The enormous homeless population, the “sidewalk psychotics” in every major city, were stark evidence that no city had an adequate network of psy-chiatric clinics and halfway houses, or the infrastructure to deal with the hun-dreds of thousands of patients who had been turned away from the remaining state hospitals

      interesting to see how so many people went through the mental illness-to-prison pipeline, and how its effects are still visible today.

    3. Erving Goffman, in his fa-mous book Asylums,2 ranks all these together as “total institutions”—places where there is an unbridgeable gulf be-tween staff and inmates, where rigid rules and roles preclude any sense of fellowship or sympathy, and where in-mates are deprived of all autonomy or freedom or dignity or self, reduced to nameless ciphers in the system.

      More in line with the description of asylums we're used to seeing in this class

    1. Memoryisessentialforouridentity,whetherasindividualsorasasociety,butitremainstroublesomeasevidencebecauseitalwaysisinformedbywhathashappenedintheinterimbetweenaneventandtheactofrecall.

      There will never be an agreed-upon way of what actually happens in history; the best we can do is go off the evidence that we have. It seems as though the author is upset with GIS for using incorrect/inaccurate data, which could easily happen without using the Software too.

    2. YetitisthishistorythatmakesusawareofboththelimitsandpotentialofGISforthehumanities-·andhowmuchitstillmustchangetosuitourneeds.

      GIS sounds like a technology that can be very useful but devoid of thought in its final creations, which seems to be the main gripe of the author.

    1. The cottage concept was derived in part from the town of Gheel, Belgium, where a church dedicated to the eighth- century Irish saint Dymphna had attracted lunatics seeking a cure.89 For centuries, the people of Gheel looked after the mentally ill who came to worship at the shrine but, exorcism notwithstanding, remained mad and never left town. This integration of insane patients into the community continued into the nineteenth century. In 1848, a correspondent for the American Journal of Insanity recounted the good character of the host families and the rapid recovery of the insane, who were employed in cultivating the land.90 Galt later touted the cottage plan in the same publication: "At the village of Gheel, in Belgium, situated thirty-five miles from Antwerp... it was well-known that the insane, amounting to many hundreds, have been placed under the management of the villagers, instead of having them in one large building, as elsewhere. These lunatics have nearly the same freedom as the citizens of the commune, going everywhere at large.""9 Galt described how some of them went to bars for a smoke or a glass of beer, and yet "their presence does not excite attention" (Figures 26, 27). Galt identified two types of patients who would benefit from cottage life-tranquil, chronic patients, and others who did not respond well to the linear-plan asylum

      Something that I feel isn't brought up enough is the possibility of Madness being dominated by European/Eurocentric views and practices. Perhaps other parts of the world have different interpretations/ideas/practices that they take when dealing with the topic of Madness.

    2. Each asylum was surrounded by acres of picturesque gar- dens.

      Comparable to the movie Shutter Island: it's certainly possible to leave, but by trying to be seamlessly integrated with nature the idea is that patients will have no incentive to do so.

    3. A few doctors employed the moral treatment in preexisting buildings, but as they refined their needs, the professional society of super- intendents began to argue for purpose-built structures that would serve the patients and staff

      The shift of focus from structural-ased treatment to people-oriented treatment is actually fascinating to see. The only are that is of concern right now is who will be considered "Insane" enough to be inside - as in, who will be considered surplus to society's requirements and cast to the side.

    4. I look at asylum buildings in the United States in order to demonstrate that psychiatrists considered the architecture of their hospitals, especially the planning, to be one of the most powerful tools for the treatment of the insane.

      Relating back to the material that we read last week, this reminds me of how the passages spent a great amount of time explaining the detail of the rooms of asylum. This mostly likely was an attempt to try to convey how ahead of their time/state for the art the asylums were.

    1. he challenges include addressing fundamental questions such as

      In these list of questions, one could also ask: how could the use of multimedia enhance or add to our understanding of storytelling, and not necessarily diverge or be exactly the same?

    2. the mere use of digital tools for the purpose of humanistic research and communication does not qualify as digital Humanities. nor, as already noted, is digital Humanities to be understood as the study of digital artifacts, new media, or contemporary culture in place of physical artifacts, old media, or historical culture.

      It can include topics related to Humanities, but doesn't have to

    3. digital Humanities refers to new modes of scholar-ship and institutional units for collaborative, trans-disciplinary, and computationally engaged research, teaching, and publication.

      The topics of Humanities but presented in ways that bring together multiple fields of research/expertise to solve them

    4. Where is the investment in the online equivalents of the Carnegie libraries, settlement houses, and other great philanthropic undertakings that promote the enfranchisement of all sectors of society?

      In what ways can we make more of an effort to preserve digital material? What type of material would even be stored?

    5. still-unanticipated effects of social medi

      In my opinion we know enough about the effects of social media and can make predictions about how people will react to events/trends on it.

    6. As every act of engagement with a digital world generates its own trail of data and metadata, the crucial tasks of forgetting, of strategically looking away, of ignor-ing, of letting go and even of erasure will become more critical.

      Is this a literal act of forgetting or this this meant in the metaphorical sense - are we supposed to turn a blind eye and try to pretend we're not collecting everything or are we supposed to actually attempt to stop collecting this data?