- Apr 2016
-
family.findlaw.com family.findlaw.com
-
If you pay child support, are you allowed to deduct anything on your taxes or claim the child as an exemption? A: Nothing can be deducted for the child support payments. Child support payments are neither deductible by the payer nor taxable income to the payee. You may be able to claim the child as a dependent. Generally, the custodial parent generally is treated as the parent who provided more than half of the child's support. This parent is usually allowed to claim the exemption for the child if the other exemption tests are met. However, the noncustodial parent may be treated as the parent who provided more than half of the child's support if the custodial parent signs a Form 8332 (PDF), Release of Claim to Exemption for Child of Divorced of Separated Parents, or a substantially similar statement.
So a deduction to a honest workers pay check not up for tax exemption. Its utterly ridiculous how they can't claim this payment on their taxes.
-
Q: Are child support payments considered taxable income? A: No, child support payments are not considered taxable income, according to the IRS. Child support payments are neither deductible by the payer nor taxable to the payee. So when you calculate your gross income to see if you are required to file a tax return, do not include child support payments received
This is crazy to think that a payment that changes the amount of income the custodial parent makes is not taxed because depending on the person paying it may push them into another tax bracket. Why should they get a free check when the non custodial parent is not allowed to claim this payment on his taxes
-
- Mar 2016
-
www.slate.com www.slate.com
-
However it’s hard to entirely dismiss Conley’s argument, based as he says on Enlightenment ideas linking rights and responsibilities, that if the man has no say whatsoever in whether the baby is born, he shouldn’t be held responsible for child support. This is another idea that comes up against absolutes that many of us would find hard to surrender: Namely that a man is financially responsible for his child. However, is that always and ubiquitously fair?
if the man has no choice he should shave some sort of way to escape responsibility as he did not to procreate. It only seems fair that he has some protection for himself.
-
“But when men and women engage in sexual relations both parties recognize the potential for creating life. If both parties willingly participate then shouldn’t both have a say in whether to keep a baby that results?”
If both are aware of the risks they should both get a say in how they would respond in case a child is produced from the union
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Are Child Support Rules Unfair to Fathers?
this shows examples of an unfair system that is being abused to support lifestyles while at the deprivation of the ex-husbands
-
- Feb 2016
-
fivethirtyeight.com fivethirtyeight.com
-
n 2011, 32 percent of custodial fathers didn’t receive any of the child support that had been awarded to them, compared with 25.1 percent of custodial mothers.
what are these women's reasons for not paying? why are these "deadbeat" moms allowed to pay less than their male counterparts with child support settlements?
-
That’s not as rare as some people might think — 18.3 percent of custodial parents in 2011 were fathers, according to the latest numbers from the U.S. Census Bureau, which is the source I’m using for all these figures. (Unfortunately, it doesn’t have data on same-sex parents.) While half of custodial mothers had legal child support agreements in place, only a quarter of fathers did (more on the reasons a bit later on).
this shows that the court decisions are skewed to favor the women in the cases where the men want full custody but why?
-
-
opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com
-
Court-ordered child support does make sense, say, in the case of a divorce, when a man who is already raising a child separates from the child’s mother, and when the child’s mother retains custody of the child. In such cases, expectations of continued finiancial support recognize and stabilize a parent’s continued caregiving role in a child’s life. However, just as court-ordered child support does not make sense when a woman goes to a sperm bank and obtains sperm from a donor who has not agreed to father the resulting child, it does not make sense when a woman is impregnated (accidentally or possibly by her choice) from sex with a partner who has not agreed to father a child with her.
why should he paying be pinned on the male when the responsibility of raising the child by court of law is in the hands of the mother. It's like forcing a sperm donor to pay for the child resulting from a surrogate mother.
-
The political philosopher Elizabeth Brake has argued that our policies should give men who accidentally impregnate a woman more options
I agree that these men should have the right to cut off financial ties to the child as it was not their intent to create one.
-
-
www.babble.com www.babble.com
-
A friend’s son accidentally got his girlfriend pregnant when they were in the last year of school. She wanted to keep the baby, and being a good guy, he wanted to support her. They subsequently split up, and she refused to let him have any access to his child although he desperately tried to have some. Yet he had to pay a large chunk of his salary every month to the women and his child. He was devastated; he hadn’t run from his responsibility and yet he was paying for a child he was never allowed to see. Is that fair?
another example of unfair treatment toward the male how is it fair that this man who is paying and wants to be apart of his child's life is denied the right to see his child
-
Years ago I interviewed the basketball player John Amechi who told me he knew of cases where NBA players had slept with women and later found them trying to take the used condom home with them.
this goes to show that some of these women may be using their body to keep up a lifestyle of glamour from others success
-
- Dec 2015
-
www.politico.com www.politico.com
-
“This issue is really about labeling more than it is about nutrition. Whether in our homes or in our schools, we want to make informed choices. We want to know what’s in our food.”
If the consumer knew what was in his/her food then they would be able to make better decisions about what they serve themselves
-
“This issue is really about labeling more than it is about nutrition. Whether in our homes or in our schools, we want to make informed choices. We want to know what’s in our food.”
If the consumer knew what was in his/her food then they would be able to make better decisions about what they serve themselves
-
Schools are under more financial pressure
Without the funding for other healthier food supplies schools are forced to make do with what they have
-
Schools are under more financial pressure
Without the funding for other healthier food supplies schools are forced to make do with what they have
-
Schools are under more financial pressure
Without the funding for other healthier food supplies schools are forced to make do with what they have
-
Schools are under more financial pressure
Without the funding for other healthier food supplies schools are forced to make do with what they have
-