2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2019
    1. “In the past, a common curriculum did not materialize because teachers had not bought in. Involving teachers was the most powerful thing we have done. They were at the table deciding what our students would learn and how they would learn it. Everything else followed.”

      This reminds me of something my school is trying to do this year. Technically we've had a schoolwide writing curriculum, but so few teachers implemented it that it was rendered ineffective. Every teacher, regardless of content area, is supposed to use this writing program so we have consistency as a school. This year, our principal intends to enforce this program and if all participate, I'm excited to see the results.

    1. The shift seems to be for teachers to be less of a source of knowledge; technology can fill that role, “Teachers can’t be the source of knowledge. Teachers have to be the designer of good learning negotiations –

      I remember having a discussion with fellow teacher candidate Rylan Whan, about this exact topic during summer session 1. Even last year, I tried (although clumsily) to be more of a facilitator of knowledge, rather than the source of it. This is really difficult to do, but well worth it. I found that designing 5E lesson plans ( a line of inquiry I've followed previously) helps me perform more as facilitator rather than a knowledge regurgitator.