Plymouth State Universities
APOSTROPHE :)
Plymouth State Universities
APOSTROPHE :)
joint
joints
another injury
replace with "other injuries"
bursae which
bursae, which
,
don't need this comma
Most functional motions that are performed daily happen anteriorly while few happen posteriorly, leading most muscles crossing the glenohumeral joint to shorten and pull our skeletal structure forward.
Maybe too wordy.
anteriorly and medially
maybe explain this? maybe a picture of an anterior dislocation?
skeleton man
Really?
If you or someone you know is considering suicide, do not hesitate to reach out to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: 1-800-273-8255 “The Lifeline provides 24/7, free and confidential support for people in distress, prevention and crisis resources for you or your loved ones, and best practices for professionals.” (National Suicide Prevention Lifeline).
I would take this entire piece and stick it at the end of the section so it does not distract from your body of research.
It’s imperative to embrace those who express suicidal thoughts, to not turn away and ignore an individual
Gah!!!!!
As of January 1st, 2018, the United States had a population of 326,971,209 citizens according to the United States Census Bureau and when attributed to MDD’s lifetime prevalence rate, 65,394,241 Americans will be diagnosed with depression in their lifetime. This doesn’t take into account the amount of Americans that will experience depression that will go undiagnosed. Additionally, the population count from the United States Census Bureau excludes armed forces member who are overseas, their dependents, or other Americans that reside outside of the United States (U.S. and World Population Clock, 2018), which only continues to mask a true representation of the amount of Americans who will experience depression in their lifetime. These numbers should be alarming as individuals who experience depression are at an increased risk for suicidal ideation, and 90% of individuals who die by suicide have some form of mental illness or substance abuse problems (National Alliance on Mental Illness, 2018).
Format
hypo-mani
hypo-manic
four
Is this supposed to be "for" instead?
of sadness, agitation, and euphoria
from sadness to agitation to euphoria.
Adverse Childhood Experiences:
I was a little confused as to whether or not this was a new section, so definitely make it more obvious that this is leading into the body of your work.
as well as
Replace with "and on" might make this flow better? It's a little strange in the transition.
Additionally, some individuals may lack certain knowledge of what is important to focus on to increase their quality of life
Additionally, some individuals may lack the knowledge necessary in order to make healthier choices, thus increasing quality of life.
Maybe?
This article focuses on the significance of taking care of our health as everybody can benefit from self-care regardless of gender, race, age, income or access to aiding resources.
Maybe leave this sentence as it is but remove the word "resources." It is still a complete sentence that covers your bases.
Introduction:
If you plan on leaving this in an outline type form, maybe you can put a table of contents with links to each section? Not sure if you're technologically capable, but it could be cool.
The significance of self care
I like this title. It's short and to the point and it will grab attention from the general population.
We believe that institutions need to do a better job helping students to complete college when they face barriers.
When I transferred into PSU with an associates degree, I discovered that most of the credits I was told would transfer did not actually earn credit towards my original major. This was a massive barrier that left me feeling completely stranded. I had already started a college education three times in the past and quit because I hit barriers and I was not keen on the idea of doing it again when I felt like I had finally found the right direction. One of my professors pointed me in the direction of Dr. DeRosa and IDS to see if it would help keep me on a graduation track. The day I met with her, I knew this would work. I changed majors immediately and began building my program out of the pieces that I had shown up with and couldn't use previously. I'm in my senior year and right on schedule with my original plan while being able to use almost every single credit I had earned in community college. It's such a relief to know that I didn't waste that money or time!
Customized majors
When a student can see purpose in every course that they're taking, it allows them to find importance in every part of their educational career; it's difficult to get through courses that don't feel relevant.
Most of these services are offered in a program that is, on the whole, radically under-resourced. But we do it by helping students see themselves as part of an academic community, and then leveraging the power of that community to support itself in the ways that it needs. Institutionally, we try to create policies and structures that make this easier.
This department puts a huge amount of emphasis on being student-centered. We are reminded regularly how passionate and resourceful the department faculty are and I'm sure that has a large part to do with the retention rate.
we see food insecurity as an academic issue, and we understand that they will not be able to learn or succeed if they are hungry
Something that ALL public educational centers should recognize!
60% and 70% of graduating #PlymouthIDS majors claimed that they would have left PSU if they hadn’t enrolled in the IDS program
This speaks again to the necessity of flexibility in higher education. As a non-traditional student, who's in her 30s, it's very frustrating to be told you can't do something. This program doesn't have "can't" in its vocabulary.
Second, we serve students in interdisciplinary fields that are well-established at other colleges but which Plymouth State, due to its size and resources as a small, rural, public university, does not offer as a discrete major.
This is where I come in - I was at risk of adding years to my education just to satisfy my degree requirements plus the prerequisites for the DPT program. Not only did the IDS major save me years, it saved me money.
In 2014, we developed an Open Pedagogy approach to the curriculum, and since then, we’ve grown in enrollments by 1,150%.
This is a testament to the importance of flexibility and freedom in higher education.
I’ve wanted to write something to document the remarkable experience I have had being a part of the Interdisciplinary Studies program here at Plymouth State University.
She's being modest - this woman is the BACKBONE of the program and the reason so many of us have been able to get where we want to be.
Overall, it takes many different disciplines in order to successfully fly a group of people around the world.
While most people probably do not sit and ponder how complicated the business surrounding air travel is, those of us in IDS will now think about that every single time we are in an airport. Not that it's a secret to the general public - but most people don't break things down into pieces like we do.
you need to make those important to you before they are important to anyone else.
Yes!!!!! If you're not passionate and confident about what you're doing, you won't be able to convince others that they should take you seriously.
Can they use creativity to solve complex problems in the workplace that haven’t been used in the past?
I feel like this could be the number 1 benefit to programs like this - fresh perspectives and new ways of thinking to problem solve.
Instead of graduating with a comprehensive understanding of a single discipline like anthropology or economics, they graduate with a smattering of knowledge, spread across many fields.
This is completely valid in some ways. Changing majors and missing the entire senior year of the exercise physiology program meant sacrificing a lot of the things I would have learned that would have made me marketable and able to actually BE an exercise physiologist.
The communication barrier poses a unique challenge to interdisciplinarity: is collaboration possible without a common language?
If one understands their discipline (or disciplines for those of us in IDS), they should be able to communicate and explain it in layman's terms. Good communication is a skill in its own, but we should be able to interact with people outside of specific fields successfully.
The attitudinal barrier between democrats and republicans makes bipartisan compromise almost impossible.
Ohhhhhhh Congress. It's kind of like sticking a bunch of kindergartners in a room and challenging them to a stubborn-off.
n addition, there are some cross-disciplinary challenges that can arise, like organizational issues and differences in disciplinary procedures.
I'm so thankful that my advisors were so supportive and trusting of my ability to put together a coherent program.
Knowledge is like a mosaic: every tile represents a scholar who has spent an entire lifetime exploring a single idea.
Beautiful!
Interdisciplinary studies is a disruptive ideology that takes control away from educators and puts it where it belongs: in the hands of students.
Our tuition pays the faculty's salaries, so we should have much more control over what kind of coursework we spend that money on.
If relevancy is correlated with time and circumstance, then students may think differently about algebra II or the Gulf War in five or ten years
I couldn't have cared less about history when I was in high school because I didn't see it's relevancy. As an adult, I am fascinated by it and by how little our leaders seem to know about it........... sigh
“Why do I need to learn this? I’ll never use it in real life.”
OH MAN have I felt like this a million times.
By challenging themselves with a variety of educational experiences, interdisciplinary students become better critical thinkers, gain more self-awareness, and grow more confident in the way their brains work and who they are as people.
It definitely requires a certain drive that a traditional major may not require. You have to build something coherent with minimal guidance that's going to be marketable and worth the loans you are accumulating.
It’s such a transformative experience for so many people that it seems almost irrational to expect students to know what they want from it before they arrive.
I am completely supportive of students who want to take a few years to experience life and decide where they want to go before attending college. I waited longer than I should have, but at 27, I finally knew what I wanted. It saved me so much time and money!
Education is exploration, a phenomenon that cannot be neatly packaged and universally distributed.
Which is why so many students change majors so many times...
For example, one of his most influential reforms was advocacy for a curriculum based on students’ interests rather than a pre-established curriculum. He believed that a student, by age eighteen, was old enough to select his own courses and pursue his own imagination (Zakaria 54-7). Interdisciplinarity abides by the same logic. Many educators disagreed with Eliot, arguing that schools exist to guide students through the established hierarchy of education. If students wander around at their own will, these educators argued, they may leave school with an incomplete or inconclusive education.
I see both sides of this argument, and I really think it depends on the student and on what the student wants. Certain specialties (physician, for example) should have a pretty solid curriculum, while other degrees (English, art, theater, etc.) should absolutely be more flexible. Some students also have NO idea what they're doing or where they're going. In that case, more structure is likely helpful.
Knowledge transformed from an experience to a product.
I love this sentence! It's very true - knowledge should be cultivated, not simply peddled to the masses for profit.
Understanding the history of education is essential to understanding the current academic climate surrounding interdisciplinarity.
Understanding history (in general) is essential for implementing any kind of change - not just for education!
It intrigues me to think that I will be able to belong to my own disciplinary community of art therapy and be a member of the American Art Therapy Association while also being a part of the art and psychology social communities on their own.
I hadn't really thought of physical therapy as being interdisciplinary at its roots, but it really is. It's the link between exercise and medicine, and unfortunately, the medical profession doesn't know dirt about exercise in general.
In most disciplines, such as say dentistry, people within that field if they’re close together location-wise they’re in competition with each other. This was weird to think of how they are able to still make a social connection when in competition.
As professionals, your number one goal should be to offer the best possible knowledge/product/service/etc, sure. BUT if you're doing something you're passionate about, competition is not going to benefit the field you're in as much as collaboration with other professionals and experts.
The medical field is most likely one of the most specialized fields in the world, even though it seems the human body and its complex systems would be the number one use for interdisciplinary study.
Some areas of study, particularly in Eastern medicine/religion, have always been interdisciplinary - physical and mental well being have always been seen as connected in those cases. Yoga is a great example. It's a lifestyle, a mindset, a daily practice that is carried into every aspect of life.
Our society is only starting to get the ball rolling on interdisciplinary communication.We know from many of history’s examples that when particular disciplines rule over a single issue, myriad unforeseen consequences may result. For example, Repko references the dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers that killed the salmon fishery industry in that region. The architects and accountants orchestrating the building of the dams could have considered the environmental impact, but it wasn’t their specialty, so they didn’t have the insight on potential impacts than an environmental scientist would have had.
I find it so bizarre that, while these people are specialists, they don't consider other areas of impact. To me, it's obvious that building dams in going to impact the environment... you're building IN an environment and changing it. I realize it's not uncommon, but I don't understand it. There's an entire world outside of your own little box....
Nowadays students are allowed to choose what they want to learn about based on their own likes and dislikes.
I don't think this is completely true outside of IDS - before I changed majors, I was required to take all sorts of classes that I had very little interest in, while there seemed to be much more relevant classes that there was not room for within the major.
The most dramatic advancements have occurred in the 50 years leaving one to ponder how the academy will look even a decade from now.
It's amazing how quickly technology has allowed for advancements in such a short period of time.
Harvard began with a single house and a single acre of land, but has now grown to an astounding 5,083 acres.
I had no idea Harvard was this large! That many acres sounds like the entirety of Cambridge.
No doubt, most academics “will go on tending their own garden” (Sherif, 1979, p. 218). This is all as it should be, provided these specialists “force themselves to define all of the available research on that problem as of possible relevance, and to see themselves as contributing to the resolution of a problem rather than as adding information to an isolated discipline” (Condit, 1993, pp. 245-246). No doubt too, and despite the hardships, a few creative individuals will continue to tread from one garden to another. We should see to it that their less-traveled paths are not overrun with thistles.
As educated people in our chosen paths, it is ultimately up to us (and not our education systems) to decide which areas of study we should elaborate upon. After you attain a degree, you are certainly not finished with your education. It is up to us to continue exploring various fields of knowledge in order to adapt and stay up to date and relevant.
Even under the best circumstances, an interdisciplinarian is unlikely to gain as complete a mastery of her broad area as the specialists upon whose work her own endeavor is based.
I don't think this is a problem in all cases. Obviously some fields absolutely require experts, while others do not. I want my oncologist to be an expert in cancer and genetics, but I am comfortable with my college professors having a variety of disciplines within their knowledge tool-box.
To reach the pinnacle of their profession, they often end up exploring one interesting feature of a single atoll. Interdisciplinarians, by contrast, are forever treating themselves to the intellectual equivalent of exploring exotic lands.
You could eat the same meal every day for the rest of your life OR you could spend your life trying a variety of foods from all over the world.
All too often, experts forget that “problems of society do not come in discipline-shaped blocks
This reminds me of the example we discussed in class last week. Obesity is not a simple problem; it is a multi-faceted health crisis with components ranging from diet to genetics to socioeconomics to physical inactivity. It cannot be solved by simply stating that "obese people need to get more exercise." All of the components need to be addressed.
The same goes for the history of ideas: outsiders are less prone to ignore anomalies and to resist new conceptual frameworks.
Sometimes specialists are so narrowly focused that they are incapable of seeing things from any other perspective. Just like a well-rounded Presidential Cabinet, people from all different backgrounds offer the most broad perspectives when working together.
Interdisciplinary knowledge involves familiarity with components of two or more disciplines.
I've never really thought that specialists weren't already doing something like this. To become a specialist, one needs to have knowledge of multiple fields prior to going into their specialty. Granted, their foundational education is going to be full of subjects related to their specialty, as opposed to art and medicine. Something to ponder, I suppose...
“Your planet is very beautiful,” [said the little prince]. “Has it any oceans?” “I couldn’t tell you,” said the geographer. . . . “But you are a geographer!” “Exactly,” the geographer said. “But I am not an explorer. I haven’t a single explorer on my planet. It is not the geographer who goes out to count the towns, the rivers, the mountains, the seas, the oceans, and the deserts. The geographer is much too important to go loafing about. He does not leave his desk.” ~Antoine de Saint Exupery (The Little Prince, pp. 63-4)
What sad imagery!!
But content, methods, and epistemologies are the central building blocks of disciplines, and it is helpful to understand these as you get started in Interdisciplinary Studies.
This change of major was out of necessity for me - I was unable to utilize my transfer credits and stay on track for graduation while meeting the prerequisites for grad school. I wasn't changing majors because I wanted to "combine disciplines" by any means. But I can see how this is an incredibly useful program for those who truly want to take an interdisciplinary approach to their education.
epistemology explains the why of a discipline
This is the purpose of our essays. In order to get the stamp of approval from PSU to customize a program, we need to explain to them our why (epistemology) using our contracts (content - the what).
Content is the what of a discipline.
This is why IDS is great. We have control over the what!
Sometimes we actually don’t want to carve a problem or concept into small bits, but instead want to see how something specific fits into a larger pattern or fabric.
When designing a major, the big picture is important. Overall, do these disciplines make sense together? How will these disciplines fit into the end game?
Both are very useful for interdisciplinarians, since breaking a problem or concept down may help us see the different disciplines that are involved, which will then allow us to organize our research approach.
This is a great approach for anyone when having difficulty understanding something. Think about all of the different movements involved in swinging a golf club or throwing a ball - the best way to understand the movements is to "drill down" from the whole to each individual joint and body part.
the number of disciplines involved
This is key - combining too many flavors can overwhelm the tastebuds and lose the original flavors as they were on their own. Too many combinations of disciplines may be overwhelming for the end result.
Both multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity are valid ways to bring different academic perspectives together.
It seems bizarre to me that this even has to be a "thing" in higher education. Majors and programs are entirely too cookie-cutter. We should have more freedom to choose our courses to better suit our future endeavors without having to jump through hoops as seniors, scrambling to achieve our goals in a few short months.
Are you more interested in INSTRUMENTAL or CRITICAL interdisciplinarity?
I suppose I am more interested in instrumental interdisciplinarity because I am a doer in order to implement change and solve problems.
Interdisciplinarity is like mixing paint. You can lay colors side-by-side to create beautiful paintings (multidisciplinarity), or you can mix them together to get totally new colors (interdisciplinarity).
Pretty :)
As a people, we need to understand where we were, where we are, and where we are going. The challenge for higher education, then, is not the choice between pure research and practical application but, rather, the integration and synthesis of compartmentalized knowledge. On our campuses, we must create an intellectual climate that encourages faculty members and students to make connections among seemingly disparate disciplines, discoveries, events, and trends — and to build bridges among them that benefit the understanding of us all.
This shouldn't fall solely on the backs of higher education - this needs to begin with primary schools and at home. Educating our future generations of leaders is not something that can be done in a 4-year college. It's a life-long process and the responsibility is on all of us.
learning by doing — including the use of community service, field study, internships, and research projects to integrate experience and application with academic work
This is something I can agree with. One of the benefits of community colleges is the hands-on approach. Things feel more meaningful and real that way. Getting out of the classroom and applying your knowledge to the real world is key to finding purpose.
The university’s lack of a meaningful liberal arts curriculum understandably sends many anxious students into the safer harbors of study that lead directly to positions in the job market.
I don't see what's wrong with getting a degree that leads "directly to positions in the job market." We need doctors, scientists, teachers, mechanics, etc.. The last thing we need is another person in the restaurant industry with an English degree.
In particular, higher-education reform must focus on a revival of the liberal arts. Yet, paradoxically, liberal education is in decline just when we need it the most. In 1970 more than half of the baccalaureate degrees awarded were in a liberal-arts discipline. By 1995 that proportion had shrunk to closer to 40 percent, while about 60 percent of the degrees were in preprofessional or technical fields. The largest number of B.A. degrees granted in the 1990s was in business.
I disagree here. Liberal arts degrees are not particularly useful in the job market. While college should create well-rounded and worldly adults, the point is really to get a job that pays enough to survive. What's the point of accumulating all of these loans to get a degree in something that's going to lead to you being a bartender? I need the piece of paper to get the job I want. That's why I'm putting myself in debt. A business degree is popular because you can do lots of things with it.
After all, political empowerment and economic opportunity stem from the same root: the spread of knowledge. Thomas Jefferson fervently believed that a nation cannot be ignorant and free; I share this view as well as Jefferson’s optimism that societies become more democratic as citizens become more knowledgeable and cultured.
Education (and not necessarily higher ed.) is the key to solving so many of the problems we face today as a society. Ignorance is dangerous.
Today’s students fulfill general-education requirements, take specialized courses in their majors, and fill out their schedule with some electives, but while college catalogs euphemistically describe this as a “curriculum,” it is rarely more than a collection of courses, devoid of planning, context, and coherence.
I feel this is a disadvantage more so in 4 year institutions. Community colleges are much more hands-on and you see a definite purpose in all of your coursework. I felt that every time I sat down in my classes at MCC. Since I came to PSU, I haven't felt much meaning to what I've been learning.
In fact, mass higher education is heading toward what I call the Home Depot approach to education, where there is no differentiation between consumption and digestion, or between information and learning, and no guidance — or even questioning — about what it means to be an educated and cultured person. Colleges are becoming academic superstores, vast collections of courses, stacked up like sinks and lumber for do-it-yourselfers to try to assemble on their own into a meaningful whole.
I love this analogy. I'm kind of sad that I didn't think of it before!
college has become a chaotic maze where students try to pick up something useful as they search for the exit
There have been many times where I felt like all I am doing is taking classes because they are required, getting little enjoyment from them. I have to tell myself "you're here to get a degree to get a job. Suck it up."
It makes sense when students find ownership in what they choose to create, how they put it online, and how it engages a broader audience.
Students will (hopefully) be more motivated to find their own voice and online identity when they're given freedom to explore and create with less parameters. Guidelines and suggestions don't have to be limiting to our creativity, but sometimes they feel that way in a traditional educational setting.
If no one wants to read the hastily constructed blog post for a class participation grade, then what is the purpose of making it public? If assignments are going to live online, don’t they need to be connected to a public dialogue? Don’t they need to be oriented at the proper audience? The web is a network for conversations, and if students still see their audience as a teacher with a red pen, then nothing changes.
I have had this thought numerous times in the past. However, I feel like Dr. DeRosa is going to help us build our identity online in a way that we never could have on our own.
they are the subjects of their learning, not the objects of education technology software.
This is so important in creating self-sufficiency.
To get there, students must be effective architects, narrators, curators, and inhabitants of their own digital lives.
Autonomy! Hooray!
This vision goes beyond the “personal learning environment”5 in that it asks students to think about the web at the level of the server, with the tools and affordances that such an environment prompts and provides.
The ability to utilize the web to its fullest extent is invaluable in today's world. There's an endless stream of information out there if you have the tools to access it.
So, how might colleges and universities shape curricula to support and inspire the imaginations that students need? Here’s one idea. Suppose that when students matriculate, they are assigned their own web servers — not 1GB folders in the institution’s web space but honest-to-goodness virtualized web servers of the kind available for $7.99 a month from a variety of hosting services, with built-in affordances ranging from database maintenance to web analytics. As part of the first-year orientation, each student would pick a domain name. Over the course of the first year, in a set of lab seminars facilitated by instructional technologists, librarians, and faculty advisors from across the curriculum, students would build out their digital presences in an environment made of the medium of the web itself. They would experiment with server management tools via graphical user interfaces such as cPanel or other commodity equivalents. They would install scripts with one-click installers such as SimpleScripts. They would play with wikis and blogs; they would tinker and begin to assemble a platform to support their publishing, their archiving, their importing and exporting, their internal and external information connections. They would become, in myriad small but important ways, system administrators for their own digital lives.3 In short, students would build a personal cyberinfrastructure, one they would continue to modify and extend throughout their college career — and beyond.
This paragraph is a perfect example of how things evolve and adapt to survive. As a species, you must evolve and adapt to changes in your environment in order to propagate the species. The same goes for businesses. Why wouldn't this apply to education? It is the most logical thing we could do!
Google, Blogger, Wikipedia, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter
Since I'm old, I remember what the web was like before these networking tools existed. I even remember education before implementation of the Internet in public schools (not to mention that I didn't have cable or internet at home until sophomore year in high school). It's amazing how rapidly these tools have reshaped the social landscape, for better or for worse.
When a student moves to a new school, for example, they often have to request their transcript, a document that lists their courses and their grades. A transcript is by definition a copy of their education record. The transcript is often printed on a piece of paper with formal letterhead, perhaps with a watermark or stamp to show that it’s “official.”
I have never understood why getting transcripts is such a chore. I've had to drive an hour to my high school and fill out a form in order to get transcripts mailed to me, and I've also had to pay for college transcripts. They're being treated like government secrets - it's insane.
While some schools are turning to social media monitoring firms to keep an eye on students online, rarely do schools give students the opportunity to demonstrate the good work that they do publicly.
Is this really the school's job? Through high school, this should be the responsibility of the parents, while college students should be responsible for their own actions. Educating them is paramount to monitoring them.
These portfolios can contain text, images, video and audio recordings, giving students opportunities to express themselves in a variety of ways beyond the traditional pen-and-paper test or essay.
Cookie-cutter education limits student ability and performance!
But there remains this notion, deeply embedded in Domain of One’s Own, that it is important to have one’s own space in order to develop one’s ideas and one’s craft.
For me, this is key. I have always been more productive when I'm in my own space, whether it be a private corner in the library or my own little space in my home.
students need a proprietary online space in order to be intellectually productive.
I think this is fantastic! Being able to customize one's space (work, personal, educational, etc) can stimulate creativity and encourage exploration.
Students have little agency when it comes to education technology – much like they have little agency in education itself.
This is a very real issue in several respects - students do not have enough autonomy when it comes to their educational future.