26 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2016
    1. There are board certified specialists in pain management who will not only help alleviate physical pain but are skilled in providing necessary support to deal with emotional suffering and depression that often accompanies physical pain.

      Specialists will alleviate all pain.

    2. Nearly all pain can be eliminated

      People will die peacefully.

    3. Should people be forced to stay alive?

      People should not be forced to stay alive.

    1. Euthanasia exposes vulnerable people to pressure to end their lives

      People will get pressured to end their life.

    2. Allowing euthanasia will discourage the search for new cures and treatments for the terminally ill

      People will stop looking for the cures to diseases.

    3. Allowing euthanasia will lead to less good care for the terminally ill

      Terminally ill patients won't be properly taken care of.

    1. The kind of humane impulses which have sustained the development of hospice medicine and care would be undermined because too many would think euthanasia a cheaper and less personally demanding solution.

      Euthanasia is less expensive.

    2. But one cannot care for people by killing them.

      Doctors are supposed to take care of their patients. They're not taking care of them if they are killing them.

    3. It is a type of killing, therefore, which cannot be accommodated in a legal system for which belief in the worth and dignity of every human being is foundational.

      Euthanasia is murder.

    1. The answer is of course, no, we have no right to deny them the dignified death that we ourselves naturally desire.

      You can't deny somebody's right to die.

    2. The process of euthanasia does not restrict or infringe on anyone’s fundamental rights and therefore does no harm.

      Euthanasia does not harm others.

    3. Because we can determine the course of our lives by our own will, we have the right to live our lives and determine our own course

      People have the right to choose their own destiny.

    4. While the intentions may be good, no person has the right to demand of another person to live a life of suffering, in fact, that is immoral as it removes their right to choose.

      Nobody has the right to force someone else to live.

    1. Euthanasia is a direct violation of doctors’ Hippocratic Oath – a historic oath whereby health care professionals swear that, “To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug nor give advice which may cause his death.”

      Doctors are violating the Hippocratic Oath.

    2. That alone is enough for euthanasia to be deemed immoral,

      People think euthanasia is immoral.

    1. assive euthanasia involves gradually taking someone off of a medication that keeps them alive or disconnecting a person from a life support machine. This kind of euthanasia is the more accepted of the two.

      Passive euthanasia is the more accepted form of euthanasia.

    2. Shouldn’t everyone have the right to a dignified death or should terminally ill patients be left to suffer?

      Terminally ill patients should have the right to end one's life.

    1. PAS gives individuals the right to their own deaths.

      We have the right to end our own lives.

    2. No one grants us permission to live, so why must we ask for it in order to die?

      It's our choice to live or die.

    3. The debate revolving around the legalization of euthanasia and assisted suicide has existed in the United States since the late 18th century.

      This debate has been going on for a long time.

    1. Oregon was the first state to legalize physician-assisted suicide, with the passing of the Death with Dignity Act in 1997. Two other states, Washington and Vermont, followed suit.

      Three out of fifty states have legalized euthanasia.

    2. Medical experts in the United States remain divided in their opinion of whether physician-assisted suicide should be legal

      Some doctors are pro legalizing euthanasia and some doctors are con legalizing euthanasia.

  2. Dec 2015
    1. Lean finely textured beef brings down the cost of ground beef by about 3 percent, which can add up quickly in a program that feeds more than 31 million school children each day.

      They purchase this beef that contains "pink slime" because it is cheaper.

    2. Thousands of schools across the U.S. rushed last year to stop feeding their students meat that contained the ammonia-treated beef, known by industry as lean finely textured beef.

      They are trying to stop students from consuming "pink slime"

    3. As of Sept. 3, seven states put in orders to the USDA for about 2 million pounds of beef that may contain the controversial product for the meals they serve in the 2013-14 school year. At this time last year there were only three states — Iowa, Nebraska and South Dakota — that had put in orders for beef that may contain lean finely textured beef.

      Fewer states are putting in orders for beef that may contain "pink slime"