Reality TV does the same to aspiring actors, musicians and celebrities.
Although the benefits of the proposal was not explicitly addressed, it could be conferred from the article that equal pay would be the benefit.
Reality TV does the same to aspiring actors, musicians and celebrities.
Although the benefits of the proposal was not explicitly addressed, it could be conferred from the article that equal pay would be the benefit.
Contestants, casts and crew members are starting to catch on. Many reality TV participants have said that they feel like strike scabs, and Bethenny Frankel of “Real Housewives” is reportedly trying to organize her fellow reality performers.
Here the author implies another possible solution to the inequality in pay between non-unionized reality performers and unionized performers.
Many scripted television shows are based in Los Angeles, where camera crews, stunt doubles, costume artisans, makeup artists and hair stylists are unionized. But shows like “House Hunters,” which are filmed across the country, will recruit crews from right-to-work states. These are states where employees cannot be compelled to join a union or pay union dues as a condition of employment. For these reasons, unions have far less power in these states than they do in places traditionally associated with film and entertainment, such as California and New York.
Note: the fact that producers are hiring from right-to-work further strengthens the argument that television producers have intentions to exploit non-union cast and crew members.
Paying these contestants is feasible. If Legend earned $13 million instead of $14 million, that spare million dollars could be dispersed to half of the contestants at $100,000 apiece – an amount that’s currently only reserved for the winner of the show. Cut the salaries of all four coaches by $1 million apiece, and it would free up enough money to pay all 20 contestants $200,000 each.
Here the author proposes a solution to the problem and the method that it could be implemented. The proposal seems to be both feasible and fair to all parties involved.
Whether it’s “The Voice,” “House Hunters,” “American Chopper” or “The Bachelorette,” reality shows thrive thanks to a simple business model: They pay millions of dollars for big-name celebrities to serve as judges, coaches and hosts, while participants work for free or for paltry pay under the guise of chasing their dreams or gaining exposure. These participants are the unpaid interns of the entertainment industry, even though it’s their stories, personalities and talent that draw the viewers.
Here the author gives a background and example of the problem in the entertainment industry that needs to be addressed.