These call records do not fully support Adnan's defense, nor do they clearly prove his whereabouts at the time of the crime. In fact, there are some ambiguous parts in these records, which lead her to question whether the investigation may have missed some crucial clues or, whether intentionally or unintentionally, misled the progress of the case.

I thought that in this conversation, Sarah would believe Adnan is more innocent, but instead, she seems to lose more confidence in him. Why is that?

In this segment, Sarah Koenig raises an intriguing question about the nature of investigative work: "Are you only working with cases where you're pretty sure from the get-go that the person is guilty or innocent?" This line touches on the ethical and practical complexities of investigative journalism. It challenges the assumption that journalists or detectives can be certain from the start about someone's guilt or innocence, emphasizing the uncertainty and nuances that often come with real-life cases.

The "little figure," is a symbol foreshadowing their misfortune. Why does Vera regard them as part of we?

In And Then There Were None, Lombard's death is indeed caused by Vera Claythorne. In the final stages of the story, overwhelmed by psychological pressure and fear, Vera shoots Lombard. This act is a reflection of her complex inner turmoil and the story's tense atmosphere. This twist is shocking for readers and adds to the overall tragic feel of the narrative.

In the later part of the story, some characters still believe that there is hope for salvation, which is quite ironic for readers who already know the ending.

Lombard and Vera have a disagreement during a seemingly peaceful conversation, and based on the subsequent text, Vera appears to be quite convinced of her suspicions.

Why does General MacArthur say that everyone is waiting for the end while also stating that Vera won't understand this as a form of release?

In the current situation with multiple deaths, people have different perspectives on the issues at hand. However, some have also identified the killer's tricks, revealing the killer's talent for confusion and malicious enjoyment.

Not only was I surprised, but the witnesses in the story were as well. This surprise could be related to the truth being revealed or the curiosity about who is responsible.

The passage shows the cruelness of an animal and also illustrates the behavior of animals being skilled at imitation. Though it did it unconsciously, it’s also harmful.

Showing Dupin's prowess in deduction and his unpredictable personality through a random dialogue. Even before the case officially begins, let the reader understand his character