10 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2023
  2. drive.google.com drive.google.com
    1. The differences existing between physicians and athletic train-ers can give rise to differing liabilities and protections under thelaw. In Morris v Administrators of Tulane Education Fund,28 anationally ranked student tennis player injured her left foot andsought treatment by the athletic trainer employed by the univer-sity.

      This can show the difference between a doctor, and athletic trainer. The trainer asserted that the athlete would be fine to resume play, but afterwards seen a doctor, and found out that there was a stress fracture that led to multiple surgeries. The medial attention is important, and team physician should be with all sports.

    2. Some states specifically provide protectionfor athletic personnel rendering emergency medical care toathletes, although those statutes differ in terms of whom theyprotect.

      I found this interesting on how every state does not protect their athletes, and how the protection plans can be different. I wonder what is the difference in maker whom they protect, and why. My biggest concern would be money issues within the state.

    3. Potential contributory negligence by the athlete•Maintenance of, knowledge of, and prescription of pharma-•ceutical drugs and other supplements

      This important to know about what type of the drugs the athlete is taking for an injury, or after a surgery. This can be important, because athletes can get tested for drugs, and it can come back positive from medicine that was given from the doctor, and needs to document to ensure that they do not have to sit out for what they were given from medical officials.

    4. Inappropriate disclosure of confidential medical informa-•tion, including violation of federal statutes such as HealthInsurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)

      HIPAA is important with athletes. For example, as an athlete at west liberty everyone has HIPPA explained to them in compliance meeting, and learn how medical records cannot be shared without the consent of the athlete.

    5. In a post-Kahn decision, the Supreme Court of Californiamore recently affirmed that players assume certain risks in par-ticipating in sports.3 In Avila v Citrus Community College, a stu-dent playing baseball for his community college was injuredby a pitch intentionally thrown at his head, which cracked hisbatting helmet. Staggering and dizzy, he made it to first base,and was told by a coach to stay in the game

      This happens more often than people may realize. Coaches tell players all the time "don't be soft", "You are alright", or "shake it off". This is the right choice to make by a coach, which asserts that most of them do not have any medical experience

    6. Unlike professional sports and to a lesser degree colle-giate competition, where team physicians are uniformly onthe sidelines, one could question why coaches should even beinvolved in such a “medical” decision.

      This is very interesting, because high school coaches do make a lot decision making with athletes who get hurt. There are never doctors on school ground, and most of the time coaches will have the final say. Which most coaches have no medical knowledge.

    7. To be familiar with features of concussion2. To evaluate player who appeared to have suffered headinjury for symptoms of concussion3. To repeat evaluation at intervals before player would bepermitted to reenter game4. To determine, based upon evaluation, seriousness of injuryand whether it was appropriate to let the player reenterthe game or to remove the player from all contact pendingmedical examination

      These steps were interesting, and people having to be familiar with concussions. Athletes will believe that a headache has occurred, when it can be a concussion. It is important for athletes to know that playing with a concussion can leader to further brain damage. These medical examinations have to be performed correctly, and this keeps athletes from further brain damage.

    8. Informed consent in the context of clearance to play•The relationship between a team physician and athletic•trainer (whether certified or not) and appropriate supervisionRecommendations for and follow-up medical care and•assessments

      This is important that the team physician, and athletic trainers are on the same page for the best result of the athlete. What stood out to me to the most was certified, or not that supervision still needs to be. Additionally, follow-ups are important, and gives physician a chance to ensure everything is corrected.

    9. The court held that colleges, private schools, and publicschools have a legal duty to exercise reasonable care towardtheir students. “That duty encompasses the duty of collegecoaches and athletic trainers to exercise reasonable care for thehealth and safety of student athletes.”3

      I found this interesting, because athletes should have the proper care, and should be treated if they are hurt. Yet, it is the athletic trainer job to ensure that athletes feel comfortable when playing, and understanding when an injury needs to be taken care of. For example, West Liberty university has multiple athletic trainers that support toward the athletes.

    10. Athletic trainers, team physicians, physical therapists,coaches, and schools all face potential liability by pro-viding medical coverage at athletic events.

      I believe the start of this article asserts what the article is focusing on and grabs the attention of the reader. Additionally, the importance of liability with athletes. Yet, these liability rules will protect the athletic staff, and the athletes who are playing sports in high school. Yet, the beginning of the article expresses how they will focus on high school athletes, but liability is highly focused on in college athletic also.