This show's how many publications the author has and their views: https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1563816/overview

The purpose as shown by this sentence is about the financial aspects of CO2 avoidance measures. The article explains economical methods of lowering CO2 emissions by analyzing the cost distribution and giving individuals information about where to focus savings.

Words like as "CHP plant," "CO2 emissions," and "green hydrogen" was created for professionals who work as engineers, chemists, or energy researchers. Which makes this text a little hard to understand.

This sentence can also be one of the main purposes of the article by explaining how higher energy efficiency can affect a increase in refining though the world.

This sentence explains how the article is complex through its citations. The reference is "(Jeswani et al., 2021)." As "APA" format, rely on secondary sources to support clams. They use clear view of using borrowed research and data. More information about APA citation https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html

This provides a complex understanding giving t-1 Co2 from the sentence. That is a another example of how this is meant for a more advanced audience rather than a general audience.

This diagram shows complex data terms with CO2 capture. Grayscale presentation prioritizing data over visuals. The terminology and detailed methodology references make it accessible only to chemical engineers and other professionals dealing with chemicals.

This format shows how the citation is important and provides the link to evidence.

This shows how the audience is targeted to engineers. Especially with the phrase "emission stacks" the author thinks the reader are already familiar with refinery and carbon capture research. Making the targeted audience chemical engineers, chemists, and other science professionals.

This sentence explains the articles purpose as the main argument in this article. The statement high-efficiency CCS "is needed" creates an argument, pushing the industry to accept certain mitigation techniques.

The hard wording assume that readers are chemical engineers or refinery specialists who are know about the processes involved in producing hydrogen. Basic explanations are not explained, showing that the content is intended only for certain people. The language communicates with members while keeping out other groups.

The authors are Nixon Sunny, Andrea Bernardi, David Danaei, Mai Bui, Andres González-Garay, and Benoît Chachuat, who are from College London. Their skill in the field by claiming that they are from the Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering and the Centre for Environmental Policy, two credible places for research on decarbonization. Respected groups like the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), which further helps credibility. Benoît Chachuat, an Imperial professor, has a high publications in chemical engineering, which further help the author's credibility in decarbonization.

This shows a example of other information he is involved with: https://sciprofiles.com/profile/2545192?utm_source=mdpi.com&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=avatar_name

This formula can be important for engineers in guessing the energy uses of a compression system, mostly for like CO2 capture where good compression of vast volumes of gas is required. Thermodynamics are combined to get a useful energy use measure.

Words like "greenhouse gas emissions" are accepted in the engineering and scientific fields. The idea that it is intended for readers who are already educated with climate science and petroleum engineering is further supported by CO2 and CCS.

This is another example how the article cites sources in the article. Explaining how CCS has a high cost, that it might not be beneficial for our environment.

All of these are the citations from the article. Explaining where they get the evidence from and knowledge.

The article uses diagrams and data graphs to explain CO2 capture for engineers and redefining.

This word is used a lot and it's for more a complex audience in petroleum engineers and refinery. He or she would understand what this word mean.

The article comes from Energies, a peer-reviewed journal created by MDPI, a academic publisher that has a lot of scientific journals in Web of Science and Scopus. The journal's DOI registration, CC BY 4.0 license, and thorough peer-review of trustworthy academic publishing evidence that it is trustworthy.

This article cites sources using numbered brackets like in this sentences. No interviews are provided only published data is used throughout the research to support statements like "IEA" and "[79,80,81,82]." All sources are listed in numerical order at the bottom of the article.

This sentence explains the purpose of the performance and costs of CO2 capture methods for oil refineries as a unbiased manner. Data tables, diagrams support rather than persuading. In the beginning, the real purpose was explained by capturing techniques being made, "evaluate and compare technical and economic performance."

This article never really name its audience but this sentence is directly is for a petroleum chemistry professionals. It uses exotic wording only chemist and engineers understand.

Through connection to college, led by Vadim Fetisov, a member of the Petroleum Engineering Department at Saint Petersburg Mining University establishes major subject creates credibility. Their detailed explanation of refinery operations demonstrates their knowledge in petroleum engineering. The primary author's position at a top mining university and the team's talks about peer reviewed literature to ensure their skill in carbon capture research, even though the study itself makes no mention of awards.

More information about the author: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthjustice

This sentence is another sentence that can be related to the purpose of this article by explaining how carbon capture can harm the environment in a way. To where toxic chemicals are released and people nearby are in danger. Earthjustice wants to reduce the chances of these things that are happening to the environment.

This sentence creates credibility also for Earthjustice's Clean Energy Program, which uses collaborations and legal action to push the transition to a future of clean energy. Their goal is to make sure that the shift to clean energy is not only quick but also fair.

The law is being used by a number of causes and law companies to oppose carbon capture and storage CCS projects that they claim will grow the span of polluting plants, such as power plants that use fossil fuels. They fear that under the appearance of the environment, CCS might be used as a reason for keeping emissions fields.

This picture highlights how fossil fuel power plants harm the environment. It shows the pollution and environmental damage connected to the fossil fuel industries, supports the question of carbon capture technology.

This phrase makes a claim on the promotion of CCS technology by the fossil fuel industry. The article does not provide data or reports to support. The article's focus on theories than a academic conversation. It appears from the absence of citations that the piece is more for an general reader rather than one that expects arguments based on sources.

This sentence makes it known that the article's goal is to fight the growth of carbon capture and CCS. The article says its goal is to change public opinion against CCS. This is in line with Earthjustice's support of renewable energy instead of offering an unbiased view of the technology impact on decarbonization.

The language used in this sentence, words like "unecomic", "polluting" and "ambitious climate targets." This is aimed at a general, mindful audience that is focused on technical details.

This annotation suggest that the article is created to guide the reader to a main view rather than giving a regular discussion."100% clean energy economy", also shows that the audience is people who support renewable energy policies.

The statement "false promises" and "deadly products." Show that the article is for an audience that is interested in the fossil fuel industry. The paper looks to be meant for activists and people in law rather than regular researcher's based on the use of emotional wording. The audience looks to be moving away from fossil fuels, as the belief that CCS is a false scheme.

This shows how Earthjustice's get information from its knowledge about law as opposed to scientific research. They call themselves as a watchdog organization, which means their objective is suing. Although their impact is serious in legal and policy debates, it should be looked against scientific facts on CCS.

The article does not have a actual author but the author is Earthjustice. Which is an nonprofit environmental organization that offers a valid analysis. That advocates to clean energy and reducing pollution. They create credibility by having a long history of engaging in environmental law and policy, making it trustworthy. However it does not mean they are a main source on carbon capture. They fight problems against industries that harm the environment.