8 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2026
    1. Akhenaten’s theology was closer to monotheism because, unlike traditional Egyptian deities, the Aten could not be imagined as taking on human or animal form. If this were not controversial enough, Akhenaten also celebrated his new religion by representing himself in a very unconventional way. In a complete departure from the divine virility of his ancestors—which even his ancestor Hatshepsut had emulated—Akhenaten had himself pictured as a normal human being with distinctive features: a family man enjoying the company of his wife, Nefertiti, and their children. This emphasis on his own humanity was an extension of his theology, which honored the life force within every being. But it was very dangerous to the ideology of royal power. The pharaoh was not supposed to be an approachable man with a quirky personality. He was supposed to be a god

      It demonstrates one of the greatest religious transformations of Egypt. It is notable because it demonstrates that a pharaoh could threaten established religious traditions, which had both political and spiritual repercussions.

    2. Hatshepsut was routinely portrayed on monuments with the masculine figure and ceremonial beard characteristic of pharaohs

      It demonstrates how women in command exercised traditional symbols in establishing dominance. It is relevant to learning gender roles in ancient Egypt and the possibility of political legitimacy dominating gender norms.

    3. Under Thutmose’s leadership, the Egyptians’ conquest of the Nubians enabled them to seize control of gold mines. They also penetrated beyond their northeastern frontier, driving deep into the Levant. By the time of his death, Thutmose could claim to rule the land from beyond the Nile’s Fourth Cataract in the south to the banks of the Euphrates in the north.

      It portrays the ambitions of the Egyptians during the New Kingdom in terms of their imperial ambitions. The extent to which Egyptians had spread is interesting, and this is why a rich military aristocracy came into existence.

    4. By the end of the sixteenth century B.C.E., the pharaoh Ahmose had driven out the Hyksos, establishing the Eighteenth Dynasty and the New Kingdom.

      It is the beginning of the most successful era in Egypt, where the Egyptians managed to regain their power after being conquered by foreign nations. It is important as it emphasizes the involvement of military action in the creation of political legitimacy and stability.

    5. Even those who prospered in the new economy were often subject to drastic fluctuations in their fortunes. A trader who did very well selling a luxury fabric might invest heavily in it, only to find that tastes had changed or that a ship full of his wares had sunk. An investor looking to make a fortune during an upward price spiral might go into debt to take advantage of the trend, only to find that supply exceeded demand, leaving him nothing.

      The reason I selected this passage was that it demonstrates that the economy of the Hellenistic period was difficult to anticipate. This was interesting because it underscores the point that prosperity did not always come, and that the fact that a city was rich did not necessarily mean that life was safe.

    6. At Antioch, the population quadrupled during a single century. The new city of Seleucia on the Tigris grew from nothing to a metropolis of several hundred thousand in less than two centuries.

      I wrote with emphasis on this section to provide precise numbers depicting the rate of growth of the cities of Hellenism. This depicts the urbanization/metropolitan magnitude in contrast to the Greek cities of classical times.

    7. Within just two generations, hundreds of thousands of migrants had joined a Greek diaspora (“dispersion”) that reduced the population of mainland Greece by as much as 50 percent in the century between about 323 and 275 B.C.E.

      I have chosen this excerpt as it demonstrates how the great migration changed the Greek culture. To my surprise, quite a large number of individuals left Greece, which is why this explains why the traditional polis became irrelevant to the Hellenistic world.

    8. The Hellenistic world was prosperous. Alexander’s conquests had opened up a vast trading area stretching from Egypt to the Persian Gulf, dominated by Greek-speaking rulers and well-established merchant communities.

      I selected this part since it describes how the business grew tremendously following the conquests of Alexander. I believe it is important since it demonstrates that big cities such as Alexandria were developed with the concentration of wealth and trade.