When i hear people speak of systems of racism this is what it looks like and sounds like. To hear her say from the plantation owner to the highway man being upset that she would want to register. Hearing that there was a system that was so against the color of people's skin. There was no other reason to oppose them from registering the only factor was color of skin. When they get off at the restaurant to do such a basic act, then they get arrested and taken to jail cells and start being beat. I don't know what i would do with that amount of pressure and persecution, the amount of hate is felt through the speech .The fact that it's such a simple request which was to be treated and live as decent human being in America.
- Sep 2020
-
www.americanyawp.com www.americanyawp.com
-
www.americanyawp.com www.americanyawp.com
-
Let everyone who feels he wishes to help in our work start right out and go ahead. One man or woman is as important as any other. Take up the fight! Do not wait for someone else to tell you what to do. There are no high lights in this effort. We have no State managers and no city managers. Everyone can take up the work, and as many societies can be organized as there are people to organize them. One is the same as another. The reward and compensation is the salvation of humanity. Fear no opposition. “He who fails in this fight falls in the radiance of the future!”
Again speaking to the emotions calling people to do the right thing. To those that are at the bottom its seems fair specially if you work in hard conditions and still struggle. So Huey speaks to those specially because the population is higher that are "poor".
-
It is impossible for the United States to preserve itself as a republic or as a democracy when 600 families own more of this Nation’s wealth—in fact, twice as much—as all the balance of the people put together. Ninety-six percent of our people live below the poverty line, while 4 percent own 87 percent of the wealth. America can have enough for all to live in comfort and still permit millionaires to own more than they can ever spend and to have more than they can ever use; but America cannot allow the multimillionaires and the billionaires, a mere handful of them, to own everything unless we are willing to inflict starvation upon 125,000,000 people
Again the numbers mentioned might be accurate but failing to provide how many people the 600 are helping. No dont get me wrong can there be evil greedy and people suppressing those below them yes. But to say we must by force get them to give up something.
-
“Share our Wealth” For 20 years I have been in the battle to provide that, so long as America has, or can produce, an abundance of the things which make life comfortable and happy, that none should own so much of the things which he does not need and cannot use as to deprive the balance of the people of a reasonable proportion of the necessities and conveniences of life. The whole line of my political thought has always been that America must face the time when the whole country would shoulder the obligation which it owes to every child born on earth—that is, a fair chance to life, liberty, and happiness.
Share your wealth sound like a vague statement but what will happen if people don't want to comply how will it be inforce. Also to force those to limit there money or give up money seems pretty evil.
-
Those are the things we propose to do. “Every Man a King.” Every man to eat when there is something to eat; all to wear something when there is something to wear. That makes us all a sovereign.
"Every Man a King" sounds good and really hits at the emotion and its interesting to hear the same message today.
-
We have to limit fortunes. Our present plan is that we will allow no one man to own more that $50,000,000. We think that with that limit we will be able to carry out the balance of the program. It may be necessary that we limit it to less than $50,000,000. It may be necessary, in working out of the plans that no man’s fortune would be more than $10,000,000 or $15,000,000. But be that as it may, it will still be more than any one man, or any one man and his children and their children, will be able to spend in their lifetimes; and it is not necessary or reasonable to have wealth piled up beyond that point where we cannot prevent poverty among the masses. …
So it's very interesting that he starts at 50 million and by the end lands 10-15 million and later even lower. When you can start limiting others money and spend their money by taxing it's easy to limit money.
-
Now, what did they mean by that? Did they mean, my friends, to say that all men are created equal and that that meant that any one man was born to inherit $10,000,000,000 and that another child was to be born to inherit nothing? Did that mean, my friends, that someone would come into this world without having had an opportunity, of course, to have hit one lick of work, should be born with more than it and all of its children and children’s children could ever dispose of, but that another one would have to be born into a life of starvation?
I agree that it hard to see kids starving and poor people specially when they are born to it. Just like its not there fault and we must help then the fact that he starts building that ultra rich people that inherit money is not there fault and should not be taken away.
-
We have a marvelous love for this Government of ours; in fact, it is almost a religion, and it is well that it should be, because we have a splendid form of government and we have a splendid set of laws.
Its hard to see what side he is on based on his comment on Government and the way he sees it. He states that government should be looked as religion which can lead to many issues for the people.
-
-
www.americanyawp.com www.americanyawp.com
-
These movements are not, to be sure, direct results of Mr. Washington’s teachings; but his propaganda has, without a shadow of doubt, helped their speedier accomplishment. The question then comes: Is it possible, and probable, that nine millions of men can make effective progress in economic lines if they are deprived of political rights, made a servile caste, and allowed only the most meagre chance for developing their exceptional men? If history and reason give any distinct answer to these questions, it is an emphatic No.
It's obvious that it got to a point that the image was more important than what he said.His image was the moving force even if other leaders did not agree they felt he could get them closer to the goal .
-
First, political power, Second, insistence on civil rights, Third, higher education of Negro youth,–
I focus on the 3 things to give up, maybe my lense is from today looking back and wonder what that meant then and to them. But asking to give up those three things seem to give almost all your freedoms. Again maybe since we today in 2020 see those things as things we can never loose makes it hard to even imagine to be without them.
-
Mr. Washington represents in Negro thought the old attitude of adjustment and submission; but adjustment at such a peculiar time as to make his programme unique. This is an age of unusual economic development, and Mr. Washington’s programme naturally takes an economic cast, becoming a gospel of Work and Money to such an extent as apparently almost completely to overshadow the higher aims of life. Moreover, this is an age when the more advanced races are coming in closer contact with the less developed races, and the race-feeling is therefore intensified; and Mr. Washington’s programme practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro races.
This part is a strong statement, many saw that people like Booker T did have some differences just because of color of skin. The fact that the thought of races being superior and inferior is hard to read and even picture the thoughts of those working hard.
-
Casting down your bucket among my people, helping and encouraging them as you are doing on these grounds, and to education of head, hand, and heart, you will find that they will buy your surplus land, make blossom the waste places in your fields, and run your factories. While doing this, you can be sure in the future, as in the past, that you and your families will be surrounded by the most patient, faithful, law-abiding, and unresentful people that the world has seen
When i read that i get a sense of unity, it is speaking of we are in this together and we are working for the same peace ad hard work.
-