7 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. “Some of the issue here is the misconception that science fiction and fantasy fandoms have long been a preserve for straight white men when they have some of the most diverse fan bases of any genre. So some of the toxicity is definitely a small percentage of white straight male fans conflating mainstreaming with a forced diversification when that diversity has always been there. The bottom line is that these types of fans are used to being at the centre of these stories, and now that is shifting they likely feel a loss of power when, ironically, they remain privileged in almost all respects.”

      As mentioned here and before, fandom in general has always been diverse, it's more so that due to social media presense and outlets, the world is becoming more aware of that diversity and while some cater to it, others deny it existed to begin with.

    2. Jenkins, however, remains optimistic in the power of fandom – and its power to bring us together as well as tear us apart.

      Speaking as someone who grew up as a fan of anime and gaming, I know for a fact that theres a draw for anyone to become involved with a communtiy; that said, I have some doubts in Jenkin's sense of optimism, simply because the symptom in question (which all boils down to equivalents of nostalgia and pride) are too deep-seated in the modern political landscape as a whole, let alone in media - the arguably one thing that could bridge those very gaps.

    3. Among other things, this resulted in a petition of more than a million signatures for HBO to remake the last series without ‘incompetent’ showrunners David Benioff and DB Weiss.

      This is an extreme example that may not speak to a broader sense of entitlement that fans feel. That said, it (and Martin Scorsese's comments about the MCU) speak to a level of unobtrusive pride that leaves no room for mutual understanding, as everyone feels entitlement and ownership over a single property and will only settle for their vision being realized. It all just turns into a redundant game of tug of war after a while, between fans and critics/creators.

    4. “The sense of ownership reflects the way humans have always engaged with stories,” he says. “We use stories to make sense of who we are. We use stories to debate our values, fears, and aspirations. We display our attachment to stories in various ways and we define ourselves through which stories mean the most to us. There’s nothing odd about this. What is odd is the idea that corporations want to claim a monopoly over the storytelling process, resist input from their audience, and lock down stories from further circulation and elaboration.”

      Nostalgia and passion both can be used as a means to create something incredible but also as a means to decieve general audiences, or fans if you will. Just looking through social media, you're certain to find dozens of examples of fan's entitlement pushing them to call for a change SPECIFICALLY to get something that they want, without considering that the creator themselves (the one likely to be commisioned by these fans) could use them and that very passion to ironically do the exact opposite of what people may want.

  2. Jan 2024
    1. Fitzgerald and Marquez decided to follow the enterprising content creator’s credo: Create your own peg, preferably with a perspective that no one else can replicate.

      A little dose of personality can really affect the draw one already possesses in their content

    2. “After a long day of work, the idea of coming home, watching TV, and then staying up until the wee hours of the morning writing a recap summary of a TV show that is mostly gonna be read by people who watch that show? I resented that work,” Jensen says, laughing. “I was like, We all watched the show! Why do you need me to tell you what happened?”

      True, if you see/read something for yourself, why bother listening to someone talk about it? Simple. Alternative perspectives - I can like a show for it's main character, but another person (one giving the recap) can explain why that character isn't such a likeable character after all.

    3. “Sopranos and Mad Men are two of the best shows to write recaps of, because they’re so dense and laden with meaning and subtext and symbolism,” Sepinwall explains. “You get to really dive in deep with, Well, what does all that mean? What was the show trying to say?” This would prove a common theme of the rise of recapping: More was being written about TV because, in many critics’ minds, there was more to write about.

      It's interesting how expansive of a concept reviews have gotten, even on a personal level, given that it can be applied to something as (theoretically) small as an internet series, let alone a multimedia conglomerate