50 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2021
    1. Determiners are words that appear before nouns and specify ideas such as definiteness, quantity. Traditional grammar books often lump determiners in with adjectives and pronouns, but we will treat them as a primary category. Determiners play an important role in noun phrases. For now we merely list the most common determiners. We will return to them in more detail when we look at NP structure.

      I noticed that Determiners are not said to be of possessives so I am assuming that the possessives were labeled as Nouns?

    2. They also take a different suffix that is traditionally called the possessive (‘s for singular nouns, s’ for plural ones) although for reasons we will come to later, it’s more accurately called the genitive.

      I find this interesting due to now possessives being called Determiners instead of labeling them as Nouns. How did this come into fruition?

    3. But they also differ in the words that appear with them. Car, as long as it is singular, must appear with a word like the or a. Gina, on the other hand, cannot appear with these words:

      I would argue that even though it sounds weird, saying "A Gina was late for work." would probably make sense. It does not specify which Gina.

    4. Words also belong to categories, and knowing membership in a particular category lets us predict where the word can fit in the sentence.

      This pretty much means that we need parts of speeches because it helps analyze the sentences clearer and helps determine what part of speech belongs to what.

    5. Therefore the was considered an adjective and to was called a preposition.

      English has come a long way since an adjective would be placed to enhance a noun and a adverb would the part of speech that would enhance the verb. If instead of Determiners, they went with adverbs for "the", would it work?

    6. But there were many problematic cases that troubled grammarians from the start. How, for example, should one handle the word the, or the word to when it appears in front of a verb?

      What did the words "the" and "to" be considered if there was no Determiners?

    7. The term part of speech, and most of the labels themselves, were borrowed from the study of Latin.[1] When English was first subjected to grammatical analysis, Latin was the language of educated Europeans, and it was presumed to represent an ideal, logical grammar.

      But now that this language is outdated, it sounds like linguists are having trouble identifying parts of speech and what rules apply.

    8. we will look at these word categories and see how the traditional account is somewhat misleading, as well as inaccurate. With a more accurate idea of word categories, we will be equipped with the basics that we need to begin studying sentence structure.

      This aged well due to being told how much broader the spectrum of parts of speech are. The basics of nouns and verbs are now accompanied by particles, coordinating conjunctions and subordinators amongst others.

    1. both syntax and phonology interface with each other because both are key elements of the structure of language at different levels.

      It is true that both plays a major role in language and contains their own structure. Phonology explores language through sound whereas, Syntax studies language through the arrangement of words. Both being key elements to language.

    2. A child that has strong phonological awareness should be able to dissect a syllable, blend phonemes, and recognize related forms (“cat” from the larger word catalog).

      It's fascinating to know how much smarter children are to be able to recognize the related forms of a word and dissect the syllables. This new discovery in phonologic puts an emphasis on the intellectual abilities of a child to learn language.

    3. Significantly for present purposes, linguists use the phonetic alphabet called the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), which uses a different symbol to represent each phoneme.

      What is the point of linguists to use a different Alphabet system to distinguish each phoneme?

    4. There are about 200 phonemes across all known languages; however, there are about forty-four in the English language and the forty-four phonemes are represented by the twenty-six letters of the alphabet (individually and in combination).

      So we only use 44 phonemes for English, what would the rest be for the other languages? Just the alphabets of other languages?

    5. Generally, decoding the entirety of a language’s structural system is ambitious as linguists face the challenge of the evolution of language and simply that some are dying out too quickly.

      Now that I have dived deeper into this course, this is very much true. Although, I would substitute "evolution" to change to make it more clear since language is just changing and not evolving.

    6. Language varieties sound different from one another because the way language varieties have different inventories of speech sounds. The sounds that you hear—combined into words that make sense—is called phonology.

      I don't really get this. Is it saying that the way someone pronounces a word and it sounds right is called phonology?

    1. Children, and adults for that matter, will adopt slang terms to show that they are hip, part of the in crowd.

      Like previously stated, New York is filled with slang terms that is easily adopted since people use it all the time. Words such as "Lit" or "Buggin" are common slang terms you will catch New Yorkers use.

    2. Language serves as a symbol of group identity. With the words we use and the way we pronounce them, we send signals to others—conscious and unconscious—about where we come from and how we see ourselves.

      This is very true. Take New York for example, we have our own language and words that are interpreted differently in other states. However, if you see those words used by someone in another state, either they are ingulfed in the culture or they are from NY.

    3. Children of immigrant families, for example, often associate the language of their home with warmth and strong personal connections, with the deepest, private sense of who they are, in contrast to the formal public language of school and the outside world.

      I read a story in one of my English courses about an Asian child who felt more comfortable speaking her native language at home while feeling embarrassed everyday at school for not being able to speak English.

    4. One reason may be the emotional investment we all have in language. Language is more than a neutral medium for transmitting a message. It has washed over us like a river continually since birth. We use it constantly.

      After spending some time in this class, I can 100% agree with this quote. Language is different and unique and it defines peoples identity.

    5. Grammar books like those you probably used in high school would dismiss this sentence as ungrammatical, telling you that ain’t is not a word, that me mustn’t be used in the subject of a sentence, and that you can’t use two negatives together. Yet people utter this sort of sentence every day despite repeated and strenuous objections from teachers. An adequate description of English must explain this fact.

      I find it interesting that people such as myself use words like "ain't" because I don't have any idea where the word came from. I don't remember when I started using the word, but now it's a common vocab word most people use. It also would be a good change if it was finally considered an actual word due to the amount of people who uses it.

    6. Adults, by contrast, lack this ability. Although a lucky few can absorb new languages easily, most people require laborious study to learn a new language after childhood.

      I relate to this after taking a course in Spanish. I realized it is much harder to learn in my current years compared to my younger years.

    7. By the time children reach school age, they have already mastered the basic structures and vocabulary of their native language, even if their parents give them no special instruction.

      This is often why many parents are being taught a different language such as English from their children and it makes sense since I've heard about these stories.

    1. In English, the future is a time-reference, but not a tense. Second, English may lack a future tense, but other languages do have one, particularly languages you are likely to have studied in school, such as Spanish, French, or Latin.

      So this means that in the English language, future tense is not an actual thing even though it was taught to be?

    2. (2) My flight leaves at 10 pm.(3) Marissa walks her dog each evening.(4) Your mother tells me you plan to go to law school.(5) Sherry will be sorry that she missed seeing you this evening.(6) If he studied, he could pass the upcoming test.

      2) Future 3) Past 4) Future 5) Past 6) Future

    3. Form used in the present tense: ________________Form used in the past tense: ________________Form used in the future tense: ________________

      walking, walked, walk. Marissa is walking her dog. Marissa has walked her dog. Marissa will walk her dog.

    1. (18) The tacos are delicious.(19) Your friend seems really perplexed.(20) The government considers Tom expendable.(21) The intense training made Rhonda tougher and more dangerous.

      I'm confused on #18 and #20 because it seems like the Adjp are the ones that exaggerate the nouns.

    2. Adverb phrases functioning as adjuncts of the predicate VP are notorious for their ‘transportability’, or their ability to move around a sentence without much effect on meaning or grammatical acceptability.

      So Adverb phrases are easily identifiable due to their ability to move around a sentence without effecting the meaning?

    1. In (13) the adjective diligent is a modifier of the head noun workers. Modifier is a general term for optional elements in a phrase that add descriptive information about the head word.

      This compared to count nouns and mass nouns are easier to understand since it's basically saying that adjectives are words used to modify the nouns. For example, "The tall camera man." Tall is modifying the noun Man.

    2. Words that behave this way are typically regarded as referring to entities that are seen as individual, countable units, and hence they are known as count nouns.

      I find it interesting that there's many phrases in English and subdivisions because it reminds me of math courses where they present a million formulas to solve one problem. Also, the irony of this being called a "count" noun and the other being called a "mass" noun reminds me of math. I'm still not clear on how neither noun works so that's another thing in common with math formulas.

    3. The complete expressions are proper names. A proper name contains a proper noun, and may contain other elements. If there is only a proper noun in the NP, it is still a proper name.[1]

      Is "The Statue of Liberty" a proper name? "The" being the determiner, "Statue" being the proper noun, "of" being the preposition and "Liberty" being an adjective?

    4. Fred and Netherlands are instances of proper nouns. A proper noun is a type of noun that refers to a specific person, place, or thing (Evelyn, Cairo, Saturday, etc.) Common nouns refer to classes of things (cat, trash, stone, etc.) rather than particular ones. All nouns that are not proper are common.

      I understand the difference between a proper noun and a common noun. Proper Nouns are specific and are actually naming the person, place or thing whereas. Common Nouns are more unclear with no context. For example, "I saw the movie." is a Proper Noun phrase compared to "I saw Avatar in the movie theatre."

  2. Sep 2021
    1. In (4), John is the direct object. In this case, which is the prototypical situation, the direct object is used to indicate the thing affected by the verb.[1]

      So is this scenario is similar to if someone says "Last week, I watched Mayweather fight Paul"? Watched being the verb, but what would be the direct object?

    2. As the examples above show, eat can be followed by a noun phrase or by nothing at all. To call the complement required, therefore, can be misleading if you assume that “required” means only one pattern is permitted.

      So more than one pattern can be permitted?

    1. In other words, subjects and predicates, along with other grammatical functions we will encounter later, are functions of phrases, not of individual words.

      So if I said "The NBA player from Oklahoma dunked the basketball.", the subject will be "The NBA player" and the predicate will be "dunked"?

    2. As a result, learning how to analyze it can be challenging because to understand one part you often need to know about something else.

      This was previously stated in Chapter 2. Language is something that doesn't just have part to understand unless you know the other parts.

    1. All of these definitions are well-entrenched in our educational system, but linguists are happy with none of them.

      Sounds like Linguists aren't accepting the prototypical definitions for the parts of speech we were taught to know. In Journalistic terms, there seems to be a conflict and a potential news story that can be reported.

    1. Language is an extremely complex system consisting of many interrelated components. As a result, learning how to analyze language can be challenging because to understand one part you often need to know about something else.

      I never understood how complex language could be until I took this course. Language has many factors involved and I agree with the second sentence. There's never just one part to a language that can be understood, there are multiple required.

    1. Linguistics wants to explain things the way they actually are, not to change them according to some preconceived notion.

      This quote taken from the story means that Linguistics purpose is to describe the dialect people use to form their words and sentences. It's used to further more accept it as a form of someone's speech. It's purpose is to not have it be looked down upon.

      1: Why do people use the standard linguistic instead of using their own? 2: Prescription and Description is an interesting thought process to think about because languages were first described and then prescribed to others. Meaning a person made rules on a language and it got described to others who then made it the standard language/format. This shows that no language is merely a standard language and a certain dialect should not be judged based on it not being deemed "normal".