Rueben felt that a wider range of voices, experiences, and identities would better capture what it meant to be a member of the campus community.
I believe this leaves room for unethical behavior because although he is making an attempt to diversify the group, he could be making his chair decision based on demographic features of the person. The decision in its entirety is sort of unethical because as the video points out, there is an imbalance when all the power is given to one individual, in this case Reuben. This point of veiw seems sort of conflicting because the committee members did give Rueben the power to make the decision on his own, but then were later upset with the choice he made.