13 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
  2. blog.richmond.edu blog.richmond.edu
    1. n this regard— flow as “the impulse to go onwatching”—Williams’s concept is neither a fascinatingbut outmoded critical tool, nor a broad brush to ap-ply to any cultural incongruities, but still a compellingmodel with which we can analyze how communica-tions systems structure societies (and vice versa).This content downloaded from76.120.235.4 on Sat, 07 Aug 2021 20:30:25 UTCAll use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

      And I believe that this will be true and long as watchable media is still viable. People will always crave more and the "Impluse to go on watching" will always live in humans as it is their nature. The construction of the flow theory in television is not only true in media but in all of life. Humans are constantly questioning and wanting answers which is why this model works so well.

    2. compelling metaphorof the ideological power of television

      I don't think that there is an ideological metaphor for the power of television. I think that any media consumption on a screen is very powerful, especially in the modern age we have seen it tear families and people apart.

    1. But we areonly just beginning to recognise, let alone solve, the problems ofdescription and response to the facts of flow.programming: distribution and flow96

      I think that this statement is very important because now that we have recognized that it is a problem what are we doing to solve it? the answer is nothing. Content just keeps getting easier and shorter to consume and people keep consuming it

    2. There are of course many cases inwhich this does not happen: people can consciously selectanother channel or another programme, or switch off altogether

      I think that this statement can now be applied with a modern lens and can speak to peoples current attention spans. Apps like Tik Tok and instagram have implemented ways of consuming hundreds of different types of content within just a few minutes of being on the app. I Truly Believe that cable television was the last time humans had a attention span that made it so they could sit through a whole broadcast on T.V

    3. or the ‘interruptions’ are in one way only the most visiblecharacteristic of a process which at some levels has come todefine the television experience.

      For some people, this unpredictable style of t.v has been something that people are fond of and keep coming back too. Fans of a series often try to search for and uncover outages from the show just because they crave more of that unpredictability that a certain show has. A stellar example of this would be the Comedy "The Office".

  3. Aug 2025
  4. drive.google.com drive.google.com
    1. The audience-without consciousawareness-continually rehearses basic cultural contradictions that cannot be resolved within the existing socioeconomic system outside of thetext: law and order versus the idea of individual success (the gangstergenre); nature versus culture (the Western);

      This is another important part about movies and T.V genres. Books kind of exist independently of the social political climate whenever you are reading the book. Movies and shows often comment or reflect the time that they were made in or are suppose to represent. So people unconsciously take their personal views and watch the movie through their personal lens.

    2. It is due to their nature as artifacts of popular culture that films andtelevision programs have been treated in a specific way in genre studies.Genre study in film has had a historically and culturally specific meaning.

      A lot of movies success does rely on its ability to relate to the current times. Often times movies will make jokes that will make sense in the current climate or at the time of their release. The same goes for genre, if a certain genre or style of movie/show is popular at the time you will see a lot of movies with the same sort of theme. An example of this would be the explosion of marvel super hero movies in the 2010's

    3. iterary criticism, which has been around much longer than either filmor television criticism

      I have taken a literary English class and I can draw comparisons between literary criticism and television criticism. Mainly on story progression because the way the stories are portrayed are very different.

    1. n the case of television, these kinds of advertisements almost alwaysshowed the product in the center of the family group.

      This is still true to this day, think of any car commercial you've ever seen, there's always a happy family going to their kids soccer practice or something

    2. Many contemporaries fearedthat returning veterans would be unable to resume their positions asresponsible family men.

      This statement makes sense, imagine how hard it would've been to come back from a war and the whole dynamic of family and society is different due to new technology

    3. . It was seen as a kind of household cement that promised toreassemble the splintered lives of families who had been separated

      so it was seen kind of as a status thing?

    4. elevision was supposed to bring the familytogether but still allow for social and sexual divisions in the home.

      This is the double edge sword of T.V you can apply it to amplify your life but also it can cause loneliness and drive a wedge in your social life.

    5. e popular media published reports andadvice from social critics and social scientists who were studying the effectsof television on family relationships.

      This is something that is still debated today, how tv and media affects families and relationships