18 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2016
    1. which are unconstitutional, by the way

      Not actually unconstitutional if police officer has reason - See Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1, (1967).

      Also, Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 7 of the Connecticut Constitution, a police officer is permitted to detain an individual for investigative purposes

    2. During that period, more than 450,000 people were stopped by the cops, an increase of 13 percent over the same period in 2008.

      Why could this be? Increase in crimes, demand for police quota??

  2. Nov 2015
    1. I believe that public compensation should avoid financial distinctions which only fuel the hurt and grief of the survivors. I believe all lives should be treated the same.

      These are his claims. Evidence presented mostly before this.

    2. This time all victims — students and faculty alike — would receive the same compensation.

      And what was the reaction to this? I want more info on what happened after.

  3. Oct 2015
    1. They feature propaganda photos of 7- and 8- year-old child models on the cover, with misleading headlines that the United States was “sentencing children to die in prison.”

      This is also true. Nobody is sentencing little Timmy to life for stealing a candy bar.

    2. The nationwide campaign to end JLWOP has spent millions of dollars advocating for these convicted murderers to be set free. Not a dime has been allocated for victim outreach or support

      How very hypocritical.

    3. But this actually disproves juvenile advocates’ reliance on the “underdeveloped brain” argument. If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world. They do not. Advocates often repeat, but truly misunderstand brain research on this issue. The actual science does not, according to expertssuch as Professor Stephen Morse, and other

      Very interesting! Pretty much blows the brain development theory in this argument out of the water. We definitely have a lot more teen crime rates than those in Europe. I don't think it's because European kid's brains develop faster.

    4. We in America have to own this particular problem, with weapons so easily available to our youth, and the violence-loving culture in which we raise them. The Innuit people of northern Canada had no juvenile crime at all until 1980 and the introduction of television into their culture

      Although I agree with his stance, I wouldn't be so quick to blame TV. Instead, we should be placing blame on the environment that these young killers have developed in.

    5. My youngest sister was the joy of our close family. When a teenager murdered her and her husband in 1990 in suburban Chicago, she was pregnant with their first child. She begged for the life of her unborn child as he shot her. He reported to a friend, who testified at his trial, about his “thrill kill” that he just wanted to “see what it would feel like to shoot someone.”

      This gives us some foreshadowing on the author's stance in the argument. His little sister was killed by a teen who had no real motive. Obviously, he is going to want justice for himself and those like him.

    1. Brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the adolescent brain responsible for controlling thoughts, actions and emotions are not fully developed.

      I think I've seen this quote 1,273 times.

    2. IN the late 1980s, a small but influential group of criminologists predicted a coming wave of violent juvenile crime: “superpredators,” as young as 11, committing crimes in “wolf packs.”

      Describing children as superpredators and wolf packs? Reminds me of The Purge.