Symbolic identification is always idenification with a normatively circumscribed way of organising the social-intersubjective space within which the subject can take on its most lasting imaginary identifications: (For example, the hysterical-vulnerable female identifies at the symbolic level with the patriarchal way of structuring social relations between sexes, outside of which her imaginary identification would be meaningless).
The female in this example symbolically identifies with the system, and not with a role inside of the system? That seems really weird.
Maybe I just still don't understand symbol vs imaginary, maybe if I understood "the Symbolic" better than this would make more sense.