7 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2023
    1. only a few of them require programming, per se. Only a radical subset of the DH community knows how to code; nearly all are engaged in building something.

      This made me rethink of how necessary we need coding or programming to learn in DH? Sometimes DH students have misconception that they always need coding to work in DH field. The other more important element to work in DH is "the ideas" of what you actually what to build, transform and create. Computational tools or even coding skills will come after that.

    2. [DH] is undertheorized

      There is still a criticism in DH as DH is an emerged new field which not a lot of people know what it is, people tend to contemplate what DH students learn and do. As a DH student, I am still not really sure with little knowledge I know about DH at this moment but I feel like it is going to be fantastic as we try to build up something by using computational tools for humanities.

    3. moving from reading and critiquing to building and making.

      It is fascinating to consider this phrase critically that digital humanists learn and combine different insights from many fields in order to discover or build something new using computational tools. That is why he says it is not about reading only but reading/researching in order to build new things. This also relates to the concept of yack and hack.

    1. too much yack and not enough hack in the working day makes us come in early and stay late

      this concept probably can be applied to any fields like the quote "actions speak louder than words" but I think it also depends how productive and efficient of yacking you try to work on. Yacking is also important in the sense that It gives us understandings and fundamentals to further work on hacking.

    1. The reason that digital humanities need to put theory first is not to pacify the powers-that-be, but to harness their own creativity towards productive ends

      Another emphasis on how theory does matter in digital humanities projects and work.

    2. Visualizations, algorithmic rearrangements, and summary statistics aren’t interpretations.

      Interesting point! Those skills are not interpretations as they need to be provided with large data/information to function and generalize ideas which all commanded/built by humans.

    3. They are much closer to being one

      Totally as I feel like digital humanities was developed based on the theory or the study of humanities disciplines, human behaviors, cultures and values along with the utilization of technology/computational tools to create or invent new things. Theory and humanities cannot be separated.