26 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2017
    1. By this point, they had almost reached their full adult height of five feet, and their wings measured more than seven feet when outstretched. Their fluffy down had long been replaced by mottled tan-and-white feathers, which were growing whiter by the day, though their heads had yet to develop the signature crimson cap.

      (11) This is just describing changes in their physical characteristics, but the implication here is that 5 and 33 are maturing. Qualities of people I know as they've matured come to mind here.

    2. “You find joy in how small and cute those last chicks are, when the other birds have grown and he’s sleeping under his heat lamp like a little baked potato,”

      (11) His physical appearance is talked about here. Another interesting method of characterization used is the metaphor – we begin to think of Thirty-Three as a youngest child. All of this further makes him stand out among other whooping cranes. It is an impressive feat to be able to successfully characterize a bird to the extent that this author has.

    3. The chick spent his first day outside of his shell resting in a heated Plexiglas box lined with gray carpet.

      (11) As we gather expositional information about 33, he comes to life more. Instead of as just an ordinary whooping crane, we begin to see him as more of an individual in his own right.

    4. But he proved a “little bit too pecky” with other members of his cohort, so he had to take a breather.

      (11) 33's character is shown here through his actions. Instead of just saying that 33 has a personality, the author explains a scenario in which his personality comes out. This is more effective than a simple description.

  2. Apr 2017
    1. As we were leaving, a man in a gold pickup slowly drove by. He rolled down the window and told Boone, “These are our birds. We’re going to watch over them and make sure no one hurts them.”

      It's good that the story ends on a more positive note. It gives the article a more optimistic tone.

    2. “The shooter did not just kill two birds. The shooter stole the deep monetary investment of governments and nonprofit organizations in Canada and the United States.

      The large fine makes much more sense when the act is put into perspective like this.

    3. Meanwhile, the third crane spent the next week wandering the fields looking for his friends. “I don’t know where that one ended up going, but for a few days it kind of stood around hollering,”

      This article is very well done, because I'm feeling terrible for these birds.

    4. Florida was selected for the second reintroduction site, and some 289 whoopers were released around Kissimmee beginning in 1993. But the birds failed to thrive, and the project was scrapped eleven years later. (Fewer than 10 cranes survive there today.)

      This article is now in the midst of a new topic: the difficulties of keeping whooping cranes from going extinct. I think that the story of Thirty-Three above made for an excellent introduction to this topic; I don't know if it would have been as interesting to me if I hadn't been introduced to it in that way.

    5. The next morning, a local game warden would find their bloody, lifeless bodies on the side of the road.

      Even though this is a nonfiction work, this has the feeling of a plot twist.

    6. “is a little bit nerve-racking, because you’re giving up control.

      As a reader, after reading about Thirty-Three's early life and all of these biologists' efforts to keep him safe, I am hoping he does well too. I suppose this means I am emotionally invested in the story.

    7. In late June 2014, at a government wildlife refuge in Maryland, a whooping crane chick emerged from his shell. He was a damp little thing, covered in cinnamon-colored fluff, and he weighed a respectable 137 grams, about as much as a baseball or a full-grown hamster. Because he was the thirty-third (and last) crane to hatch at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center that season, the biologists there called him Thirty-Three.

      This seems to be a great example of creative nonfiction so far; the way it is written makes me feel as if I am reading a story, even though the information is nonfictional.

    1. At the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Tom Cronin peers into an aquarium tank, and two googly compound eyes, like muffins mounted on stalks, peer back at him. “Mr. Googles,” as Cronin affectionately calls him, is a gorgeous animal, bedecked in a kaleidoscopic coat of peach, white, green, and blood-red. He is a mantis shrimp—one of a group of crustaceans named for the quick-punching arms protruding beneath their heads, like those of praying mantis. Mr. Googles’s arms end in formidable hammers, which unfurl with such speed and force that they can shatter seashells and aquarium glass.

      This paragraph more closely represents creative nonfiction than do other parts of this article. Here, the author tells the story, while other parts of the article are purely informational.

    2. But these eyes were already complex, and there are no traces of their simpler precursors. The fossil record tells us nothing about how sightless animals first came to see the world. This mystery flustered Charles Darwin. “To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances ... could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree,” he wrote in Origin of Species. Creationists like to end the quotation there, with the great man doubting his own theory. But in the very next sentence, Darwin solves his own dilemma: “Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist … then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real.”

      The more deeply the article makes me think about this, the more interesting it becomes. I've never thought this deeply about eyes before, so I've never encountered these questions before.

    3. With the help of its eyes, this brainless blob can find food, avoid obstacles, and survive.

      So far it appears as if the box jellyfish uses its eyes to detect its surroundings (which is what I assumed was the purpose of human eyes as well).

    4. “If you ask people what animal eyes are used for, they’ll say: same thing as human eyes. But that’s not true. It’s not true at all.”

      That was an effective hook. I'm already curious and ready to read this whole article.

    1. He also suggested that my reporting methods were "better suited for celebrity and entertainment reporting."

      I think that Bauer is explaining the CCA's argument against his investigation of them to be fair. Of course, it's hard for me to side with the CCA here after reading this entire article about what goes on inside one of their prisons (and I'm sure that Bauer knows this).

    2. most of the gates ain't got officers." He sighs dramatically. (CCA claims to have "no knowledge" of gates going unmanned at Winn.)

      I like how he continues to interrupt himself by stating the CCA's official position on all of these circumstances. This really drives home his point that life at prisons for inmates and guards alike is much worse than we might think.

    3. and are achieved mostly through "moderate reductions in staffing patterns, fringe benefits, and other labor-related costs." Wages and benefits account for 59 percent of CCA's operating expenses.

      Now it makes sense why the guards are paid so little.

    4. CCA and other prison companies have written "occupancy guarantees" into their contracts, requiring states to pay a fee if they cannot provide a certain number of inmates.

      Does this mean that it is in the states' best interest to either send more people to prisons or to keep people in prison for as long as possible? If so, this system seems completely unfair to those imprisoned.

    5. "Somebody's go' win. Somebody's go' lose. They both might lose, but hey, did you do your job? Hell yeah!" The classroom erupts in laughter.

      It seems that these people are being trained not to have much sympathy for the inmates.

    6. I take a breath. Am I really going to become a prison guard? Now that it might actually happen, it feels scary and a bit extreme.

      This appears to be an example of creative nonfiction, then.

  3. Mar 2017
    1. one of the first things that I look at is my horoscope.

      Horoscopes don't inform us about the world at all; they exist purely for our entertainment. I think that the fact that horoscopes appear in newspapers alongside the news brings support to Dubner's point that we see news as a way to entertain ourselves.

    2. DUBNER: These days, of course, there’s plenty of political information on TV, with a flock of cable channels especially devoted to politics. Or should I say, devoted to political entertainment?

      I wonder what happened between then and now. Perhaps people started seeing television as a better source of news than newspapers and radios, and so the number of news channels grew?

    3. I don’t think there’s any data, I’ve never heard of any study, that actually tries to pin down the way in which this sort of drama and entertainment element of primaries is a contributor to a more informed public.

      Is the purpose of primaries to make the public more informed? I always thought that primaries were a way for the members of a party to decide what kind of candidate and what kind of policies they will try to put into office.

    4. DUBNER: Anya’s my kid. Maia and Logan are two of her friends. At school, in history class they have a current-events unit. Once a week, the teacher assigns them a news article to read, or the kids pick their own. From The New York Times, the BBC, CNN …

      I think that Dubner began with the testimonies of these kids because he is trying to show the pervasiveness of this idea that we watch the news to keep ourselves informed.